MRP / Trib. Tribunal Thread - rules and offences discombobulation

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

The Ruling

Tribunal Chairman David Jones:

The jury are not clearly satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the conduct of Powell-Pepper was unreasonable in all the circumstances, therefore the jury finds him not guilty of the charge of rough conduct.

The jury notes McEvoy being a big ruckman, considers that he was leaning in and rotating away. His arms became free and in the jury's view, he was riding the tackle. Looking at all the circumstances the jury is of the view Powell-Pepper executed a good tackle. It all happened in a split second. In the jury's view excessive force was not involved.
 
And this took two hours to get to the inevitable conclusion?
FMD 😠🙄
At least justice prevailed, but **** me stupid, had it been a guilty verdict the AFL would have needed to rewrite every rule relating to physical contact.
 
At the game I jumped out of my seat, stood up and applauded SPP as it was right in front of me I was on level 3, for the tackle and then getting up and going again and helping to get the ball out of bounds. People around me stood up as well.

Just looked at the tackle again on the AFL website and the score was 62 v 58 and there was 3.44 left in the game. It was a match saving type tackle that had to be made and nothing was wrong with it!!!

Thank you Mr Johnson, Mr Loveridge and Mr Loewe. A commonsense decision was made.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

In the Sam Powell-Pepper Tribunal hearing as he attempts to get off one-match ban for a dangerous tackle on Ben McEvoy. Power representative Ben Krupka just highlighted McEvoy's 'Big Boy' nickname to explain how hard he is to tackle
 
AFL Counsel Trevor Gleeson submitted that the tackle was dangerous because McEvoy was in a vulnerable position because he was being rotated in the tackle and was falling backwards.

He said Powell-Pepper had a duty of care to McEvoy and should have release the tackle sooner, failing to take sufficient regard to his safety.

“I don’t say that Powell-Pepper commenced the tackle improperly or the centre part of the tackle was improper,” Mr Gleeson said.

“He grabbed him around the waist... the problem with the tackle is how it ended up.”
 
I reckon it was Stewart Loewe that concussed himself from slamming his head onto his own knee??

He was punched in the head and partially KO’d by a spoiler,

Landed funny as a result with his knee buckling (separate injury),

Head-butted his own kneecap upon landing and put himself deeper into la-la-land.
 
I realise the not guilty verdict means we aren't required to pay the $10k appeal fee but is there a mechanism for the AFL to be required to pay Port's legal costs in situations like this? Because if there isn't, there should be.
 
Proud that we backed SPP on this.

By asking him to play this way we should also bear the risk of Dan Christian throwing ludicrous, racist charges against our guilty before being proven innocent Sam.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

MRP / Trib. Tribunal Thread - rules and offences discombobulation

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top