Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Here’s that incident… I’m wrapped that he’s been called out in the media for it!! Like I said, he’s too good a player to do this sh1t!!The Daicos boys are very good players, so it really riles me up when the umps keep giving them soft free kicks (like FFS they don’t need any extra help!) … and Nick especially has to stop looking for frees, that one where he was on the ground in Q3 and he deliberately threw his head to our defender’s arm to make out he was hit high was sickening, the ump who gave that free should be given a spell!
Hows Rowbottom going as a defensive mid now?Disregarding the context in his trading rowbottom argument is bad faith.
Ceaser rated him highly and thought he was being wasted as a defensive mid, and because of this said Sydney may as well trade him while he was young.
2022 - Mills was AA in his only season as a full time mid. Mills comes into the midfield and plays mid/half back as opposed to Heeney/Warner/Parker/Gulden and even JMac playing Mid/half forwardWe play our best footy on the G. We have for a few years now to be honest.
How good is it that some of our better players are going to miss out because of our depth. Great problem to have.
For mine;
Parker comes in and plays forward
Mills comes in and plays half back
Adams comes in the middle
Errol permanent wing
Braeden dropped
Lloyd dropped
Jordon dropped
You can't see how Lloyd is dropped when the last 2 games he's been moved to the wing/half forward because Matt Roberts has owned the HB position? McInerney and Gulden, Jordon, are all better wingers then Lloyd, so thats how Lloyd misses out.2022 - Mills was AA in his only season as a full time mid. Mills comes into the midfield and plays mid/half back as opposed to Heeney/Warner/Parker/Gulden and even JMac playing Mid/half forward
I cant see a place for Adams once Mills is back..
Im struggling to understand how we can drop Lloyd and/or Campbell
I used to think the Swans liked the wider grounds - MCG, SCG etc as it was good for our spread and we could open up the corridor more easily.. but we're the only team to beat the Cats at their toothpick ground.
I now think think our system just works well no matter which ground.. but yep, as a kicking team, the bigger the better
easily.. but we're the only team to beat the Cats at their toothpick ground.
I now think think our system just works well no matter which ground.. but yep, as a kicking team, the bigger the better
If we're gonna play Parker forward I'd just drop Hayward. IMO Fox has to stay in. He's currently the best pressure player in the forward line.Parker in for Fox to rotate between forward and mids with Hayward being the more defensive one again
Adams in for Roberts, who pushes pushes Heeney to the wing more and Lloyd goes back to defense
Mills when he comes back will be in for Campbell or Jordon, whoever is performing the worst
Fox to be the versatile sub
If we're gonna play Parker forward I'd just drop Hayward. IMO Fox has to stay in. He's currently the best pressure player in the forward line.
Maybe Roberts gets dropped for Lloyd to move back to half back.. finals experience and all.. If Roberyts can keep Lloyd out of half back, then he's doing bloody well. Could happen, at the least its an interesting watch.You can't see how Lloyd is dropped when the last 2 games he's been moved to the wing/half forward because Matt Roberts has owned the HB position? McInerney and Gulden, Jordon, are all better wingers then Lloyd, so thats how Lloyd misses out.
So who are you dropping for Parker and Adams? Then assuming you're dropping Adams for Mills (which I just can't see happening as second half the season, finals experience and all)
I think he'd offer more than Hayward. He's as good a mark, a better kick and tougher. He's just slow so can't offer much pressure-wise. Balance him out with Fox and/or Wicks and he'd be an asset IMO.Unpopular opinion but if everyone keeps their form, Parker doesnt fit, other than taking the sub role
I am off to hide
To double down on your unpopular opinion....Unpopular opinion but if everyone keeps their form, Parker doesnt fit, other than taking the sub role
I am off to hide
I think he'd offer more than Hayward. He's as good a mark, a better kick and tougher. He's just slow so can't offer much pressure-wise. Balance him out with Fox and/or Wicks and he'd be an asset IMO.
To double down on your unpopular opinion....
Wicks has been awesome as the sub the first two games
I don't disagree but just calling it as I believe the coaches see itIf we're gonna play Parker forward I'd just drop Hayward. IMO Fox has to stay in. He's currently the best pressure player in the forward line.
Hayward covers the ground much better, is a better jump and offers more as a target coming out of defence. Parker is too slow and not athletic enough to be a true half forward.I think he'd offer more than Hayward. He's as good a mark, a better kick and tougher. He's just slow so can't offer much pressure-wise. Balance him out with Fox and/or Wicks and he'd be an asset IMO.