I thought they did explain exactly why they gave him the extension (with the rumoured clause that he could be flicked if we didn't play finals).Are those part statements incorrect?
Been plenty on here not happy with decisions made by Lethers and the Pres and all of a sudden those same people are really happy with them? Talk about an easily pleased bunch.
The point is that it was more an attempt at ass saving. How can you give a bloke a contract extension in the same month you start a review?
If you're going to make this call. Be upfront and honest. Put all the cards on the table. Not hide behind things.
The review was actually a thorough one & not simply a facade. "It finished a month ago & I've spent the last month trying to find another outcome".
And isn't every sacked coach presser an exercise in arse saving?