Happytigerlove
Debutant
- Sep 20, 2013
- 53
- 127
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Big call, if Tambling could get us currency anythings possiblePick 6 has to be used because most of our player's have no currency
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Big call, if Tambling could get us currency anythings possiblePick 6 has to be used because most of our player's have no currency
By giving them next years first for Prestia. That is more than fair. Throw in a player too if they want like Lennon, a former pick 12.
Great so were going to get stuffed over by Cats and Suns.
Do clubs just hate us or what?
Trade jack to Norf for 11 and trade that to gc
Read my post above again. If you think you are not going to improve you should be ONLY looking at the draft now and not topping up.Why would next years be more fair? Are you assuming we finish in the top four?
I'm not sure I said that. I think we can be much more aggressive in a re-build/re-generate or whatever you want to call it. I find it fascinating a player like Jack Steele wants to go the saints. They played in a premiership you know. Going straight past us. The ******* saints.
Read my post above again. If you think you are not going to improve you should be ONLY looking at the draft now and not topping up.
Yeah...I'd keep Jack and trade Cotch and get a lower pick.
You cannot look at it like that though. Yes we could do worse and finish bottom two. My argument is that if we really think that is where we are going to head, we should forget about Prestia and other costly imports and just go to the draft.May be the right move now.
Back ourself in to do better than this year. If we finish top 8 then it's a fair pick for Prestia.
Buuuut it could backfire hard if we flop again.
And their list (Saints) had a core to build around, we haven't had that for three generations.
And the trade out / delist everything that "won't be a part of our next flag" and start again is the dees plan (which imploded and infected the club with a tanking mentality)
Hut
Which they got through.........the draft? Your argument only applies to Melbourne which you are fixated on. Saints, Adelaide, WCE, Doggies are all other examples that could be used. I'm not sure why you can't use them as the yardstick other than a team that has failed.
Meanwhile the Hawks have cracked on with exiting a bona fide club champion despite having way less time to organise stuff...if time is a good measure of being prepared.
Chalk and cheese...
You won't get lower. He'd only go to a club contending, which rules out gc, and gws cap is bursting. Dons wont do 1, and blues need 5 for their annual gws recruitment drive
Pretty much. The ones that do we wouldn't trade and the ones that we would trade no one wants it seems.Pick 6 has to be used because most of our player's have no currency
You may wanna check when it finishes.lolWe've smashed the trade period have we?
Nope. You can trade into lower picks. Just ask the Hawks.
None of them went their list with a flamethrower. Only Melbourne did
Yes. Yes they do.Great so were going to get stuffed over by Cats and Suns.
Do clubs just hate us or what?
The top ten is basically gc and gws, and they are trading into it, not out
Schultz,plays like poo then as soon as he leaves plays like a superstar.dog campaigner
You may wanna check when it finishes.lol