What if we lose Paps but end up with Serong (5), McAsey (11), Bennell (for free) and also another good kid with pick 23.
p.s.
[Personally I would use pick 5 on McAsey]
p.s.
[Personally I would use pick 5 on McAsey]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What if we lose Paps but end up with Serong (5), McAsey (11), Bennell (for free) and also another good kid with pick 23.
p.s.
[Personally I would use pick 5 on McAsey]
We simply cannot entertain trading Papley or Jones unless we get players back from somewhere. Losing a gun small fwd and fast midfielder is something we simply cannot afford.
Maybe we should be careful about speculating on a player's private goings on. I'd imagine friends or relatives may read some of this stuff here out of curiosity.I know it's all tongue in cheek but I still cringe. Maybe it's just my own guilty conscience making me nervous for them.
Do you really think they would?
I know they doDo you really think they would?
The 'Bob' interview of Fev the other day indicated that he would read all sorts of discussion boards.Do you really think they would?
lewis johnston 2nd in the mgarey medal. its an option.
Why? Papley is much more valuable than Daniher. Papley should have another 8-10 years x 30 goals P.A. plus many more score assists ahead of him. Given Danihers history he probably has 5 half seasons x 20 goals P.A. He also as OP which we our medicos don't have a good history with.To get daniher i think we will have to let papley go
Bradshaw or Crouch would be great but we'd be without a small forward. Ronke isn't up to it.I like Paps and want him to stay but if we got pick 8 (or 10?) for him we should take that and run. The club won't be planning on staying down the bottom for long. Along with our pick 5/6, that's either two top 10 picks to use in the draft in the one year we're down here, or two top 10 picks to use to land an Angus Brayshaw or Brad Crouch. Win/win scenario.
I see what you're doing there. Spreading rumours in the hope that they break up and he stays. Very cleverYes I've thought the same thing.
I know someone who knows Papley on a social level and he made out to her that he was pretty happy here in Sydney- living his childhood dream was the actual terminology.
He also never bothered to mention to her- or her friend whom he got pretty up close and personal with, that there was a GF in Melbourne
Do you really think they would?
We simply cannot entertain trading Papley or Jones unless we get players back from somewhere. Losing a gun small fwd and fast midfielder is something we simply cannot afford.
No way , no how is paplet worth more than daniher.Why? Papley is much more valuable than Daniher. Papley should have another 8-10 years x 30 goals P.A. plus many more score assists ahead of him. Given Danihers history he probably has 5 half seasons x 20 goals P.A. He also as OP which we our medicos don't have a good history with.
No way , no how is paplet worth more than daniher.
#1 he is a small fwd/make shift mid
#2 he really hasnt achieved anything. Very good this year but still a ways off from being elite. Didnt even make AA 40 man squad
#3 daniher is a key forward and a proven one at that. Key forwards are arguably the most valuable players in the game, hence when you get a talented but yet undeperforming one such as sam reid over the years, you hold on to them.
There is literally dozens of players in the afl capable of playing papleys role to his level or higher.
Ben brown, buddy, cameron,tom lynch and tom hawkins are the only players on the same level or higher than daniher. Plus none of them can play dual position like joe.
Papley was great this year, and is going to be a very dangerous playere for years to come, but imo he is not as valuable in the league as some on here believe
Is he that bad off the field?