Haha seems people can even be twincist these days.
Does every person need to get offended by everything these days?
Not everyone, just mostly people that aren't cis, white or male.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Haha seems people can even be twincist these days.
Does every person need to get offended by everything these days?
Yeah, missed that part oops..and their first next year
Or straight, or middle classNot everyone, just mostly people that aren't cis, white or male.
They're just not being creative enough on that one. Brayshaw's salary would be part and then make May take a haircut to fund the rest. Front load Hill's deal while May serves his penance.He also just said they can't afford to pay hill
Did you hear Dwayne ark up about an hour or so ago? Came across.....well came across for what he is, a flogFinally, a well spoken Freo supporter who effectively gets the message across
Dwaynee of course, conveniently lets that one through to Barlow
you mean a 3 way trade like melbourne get 18 or 13(bulldogs) saints get hill and freo get 12 + brayshaw?Now we're enquiring as part of the Hill deal.
In the end, I would be stoked with 12-13 and given I know we arent getting their future 1st since they seem to think they are entitled to Ben King then 12 and 13 is the only scenario I see playing out that we are happy with.
Think it will happen and we'll have 4 first round picks this year from the top 15 where picks 3-15 are a deadheat
Will be a good result
We win, Acres effectively decent steaknives. Deals 100x better than 6 and a future 3rd.12,13 and acres for Hill and future second, who wins?
think acres could flourish learning from Fyfe and Mundy as opposed to Stuv and.... their other midfielders?
can someone ELI5 how this points/bidding system works?
if the Saints give us 12 and 13 and the Henry bid comes in at say 11, what happens to those picks?
Highly doubt Henry goes before #12.I believe we take Henry and pick 12 slides back to pick 55. The latter pick covers the points surplus of #12 over (#11 minus 20%).
Again, this is very speculative. If our backyard is our strength then it should also be our strength to compare it with the SA and VIC potential and pick accordingly. I personally feel the top end talent suited to our list's needs are rated to be from outside WA (with WA's strength being the volume of that next tier down). Subjective, yes, but one qualified by far more experienced eyes than mine or yours.
Well, I for one am glad we got at least one trade done.
Ah yes of course !Not everyone, just mostly people that aren't cis, white or male.
Im ok with the deal but your relying a lot on Bulldogs giving up pick 13.In the end, I would be stoked with 12-13 and given I know we arent getting their future 1st since they seem to think they are entitled to Ben King then 12 and 13 is the only scenario I see playing out that we are happy with.
Think it will happen and we'll have 4 first round picks this year from the top 15 where picks 3-15 are a deadheat
Will be a good result
It's not 1. You will never get 2 firsts for Brad Hill. He will probably stay at freoyep spot on Joao, reckon its 1.
Thanks.It's not 1. You will never get 2 firsts for Brad Hill. He will probably stay at freo
It's those same experienced eyes that have pretty much failed in their drafting over the last 10-15 years or so. our first round drafting especially has been terrible, and our recruiting out of Melbourne (but for a couple of VFL mature agers in Barlow and Ryan) has been abominable.
I'll say this again because it's so important.
We are not going to outsmart all Melbourne clubs in drafting Melbourne kids.
We were so arrogant thinking we could that we based our head recruiter out of Melbourne. Madness. And it predictably failed.
It's not 1. You will never get 2 firsts for Brad Hill. He will probably stay at freo
I reckon we would have to be damn unlucky to have a bid on Henry from 8 to 11.Im ok with the deal but your relying a lot on Bulldogs giving up pick 13.
I’m assuming 18 lined up for Ryder/Howard. St Kilda are ponying you a big and long term contract for Doogie Howser MD so have said we’ll have first round thanks.
Also I’m still concerned that 12 will get burned by either of the clubs between 8 and 11 on Henry. I’ll post Separately another scenario which I think works and they keep 2020 first and we stay out of the danger zone.
Problem being Wells was on the trade radio interview panel saying 37 isn’t on the table for Stevens. I’d say they relent and agree to 37, maybe 36 at best but no way Wells goes yep we’ll give you a four pick upgrade in addition to 36 or 37. Maybe a 1 pick upgrade to from 18 to 17 but that is also unlikely considering it is Wells we’re taking about.Saints can easily get this done.
First play is to dangle 18 and Stevens or 18 with Bruce for 13 or 14 with Dogs or Geelong and also receive pick 32 or 37.
They’ll then be armed with 12 and 13 or 12 and 14 + pick 32 or 37.
From there it unfolds.
Sorry for the intrusion just wanted to say well done to Bell and Freo for not buckling to media pressure from Barrett and the other pricktorians who think you should let Hill go back to Melbourne despite being contracted. If its alright for Geelong to hold Kelly to his contract when he obviously wanted to return to WA, then its fair game WA teams do the same if they are not offered market value for gun players.
fu** the Vic bias.