- Jan 10, 2011
- 34,367
- 57,683
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Ormond AFC
They can bite as hard as they like. We won’t give him away, he is contracted.
No he won’t be free
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
They can bite as hard as they like. We won’t give him away, he is contracted.
“In my opinion, we won’t get that”
I should but then I never understand everyones replies to you.Put me on ignore. Not that hard. Fancy talking trading
Club has put it out there that it will listen to good offers on pretty much all but about 6 players.I don’t think we instigated it at all unless you’ve got something that backs this up
Well that’s only part of the story. A small partAdelaide got pick 13 for Mitch bloody McGovern
Depends how badly they want him.I think we take it as read that it’s opinion unless you think someone on here actually works at the club. I certainly have no knowledge of any trading numbers. I use common sense and try not to be biased
Depends how badly they want him.
21 for Stanley ring a bell?
If you use Hickey as a comparison then Bruce is a top 5 pick... Lots of love.What about hickey and hanners
Agreed. Why else would we be trading a contracted, best 22 player in an area with no depth if we weren't getting something which absolutely suits us.The way I see it, there is no reason to trade Bruce for less than pick 12. Unless he has s**t the bed in some way at the club, how does common sense lead anyone to the conclusion that we trade Bruce for a pick in the 20s..? My common sense suggests that the Saints see an opportunity to get overs for an above average player, are seeing if the Dogs will bite, if they don’t then we keep Bruce...so I can very much see 12 landing in our laps from a club who thinks they are a good forward off another premiership..?
Is that the hickey who plays in maybe a premiership side. We obviously see footy differently. Anyway I made my point that pick 12 is not happening in my opinion unless we give a fair bit back.If you use Hickey as a comparison then Bruce is a top 5 pick... Lots of love.
Hanners came cheap because of injuries and we took a fair bit of salary from the Swans. I suspect the favour to be returned this year with Jones.
We got Hannebery cheaper than we should have because we took on him whole salary and Sydney needed that cap relief. We did them a favour, and the trade reflected that.What about hickey and hanners
I, personally, found his 6 disposal, 12 hit out performance on Thursday inspiring. What a star we let goIs that the hickey who plays in maybe a premiership side. We obviously see footy differently. Anyway I made my point that pick 12 is not happening in my opinion unless we give a fair bit back.
Plenty spuds have ended up as premiership players. I'm not sure what your point is with that comparison.Is that the hickey who plays in maybe a premiership side. We obviously see footy differently. Anyway I made my point that pick 12 is not happening in my opinion unless we give a fair bit back.
My point is he is the best ruck in the afl and we let him go for a third rounder.Plenty spuds have ended up as premiership players. I'm not sure what your point is with that comparison.
Hickey is terribleI, personally, found his 6 disposal, 12 hit out performance on Thursday inspiring. What a star we let go
Free agent. Free to good home. Hope you use himHe's currently the third banana behind Stanley and Blicsavs yeah?
I think i'd rather Isaac! Is he seriously up for trade?
He was much better when third man up was still around. The removal of that rule hurt him badly.Hickey is terrible
One of our biggest mistakes
hickey?My point is he is the best ruck in the afl and we let him go for a third rounder.
Mate that's an easy one. Just stick a blonde wig on me...
She seems like a nice enough bloke.
Plenty spuds have ended up as premiership players. I'm not sure what your point is with that comparison.
It's funny because on previous discussions you have continually said that if we want a player, we pay the price and get it done.
Is Hall worth pick 5? No but we might end up payingbit because we want him badly enough and he fills a need.
So why wouldn't the Dogs do the same for Bruce? If he fills a specific need and they are happy to throw big $$$ at him, then common sense says they will pay overs for him.
A spud? Don’t think so or are you saying you sometimes get ripped off in trades.Cripps
they have no chance - the board makes the call not some knob on facebookAnd someone put up a savage Josh Bruce petition on change through facebook. https://www.change.org/p/st-kilda-f...e_location=combo_psf&psf_variant=combo&skip=1
They are going to start thinking Saints fans are nutters, the second one I have seen where fans are tying to overrule the club. Brad Scott had one too.
Shane Kerrison!Cripps