Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Top line ruckman" isn't based on anything though. Maybe he will be, but was regarded at Port as a fwd/ruck, with Hayes as the better pure ruck. I'm fine if he just turns out to be a good fwd/2nd ruck though, might have to be no.1 for a few years regardless.Ladhams really wanting to come to us I see as a real positive. He's a top line ruckman and at the price we got was a free hit, a shift down in the first when there is stuff all between 10 and 25, meh.
Two KPD is overkill for me especially in a draft that is thin for them. Get one whether that be Van Rooyan or one in the second round, but that's it there's more next year.
"Top line ruckman" isn't based on anything though. Maybe he will be, but was regarded at Port as a fwd/ruck, with Hayes as the better pure ruck. I'm fine if he just turns out to be a good fwd/2nd ruck though, might have to be no.1 for a few years regardless.
JVR is primarily a KPF, but can swing back. So there's flexibility there, especially if we grabbed another KPD. Just going by that list of our 2023 KPFs, we might need to address it at some point (and god knows our KPD depth is suspect by 2023).
Not sure where you get the "JVR has been better in defence" theory from?His games when he played as a ruck were top quality. I do have queries on next year and Hickey is there, but long term this was the play we literally paid a pick in the 30's worth for a guy who can genuinely ruck.
JVR has been better in defence, think many see him as a defender first and foremost. My view is if we don't get him that's fine, get a Sinn type, or Sons at our pick (whatever mid/running defender), then look at a defender at our second and there is a few around there.
Just don't want to see reaches if JVR is off the table.
Not sure where you get the "JVR has been better in defence" theory from?
His last 6 games this year in the WAFL Colts yielded bags of 4, 4, 3, 2, 5 and 6 goals.
Not quite the hallmark of a defender.
The only bloke to really quieten him down was Bazzo.
He competed with Darcy which was promising, beat up on teams with no real ruck, and got toweled up by Grundy - so a mixed bag. He's still young for a ruck, but I think his prowess so far is being overstated.His games when he played as a ruck were top quality. I do have queries on next year and Hickey is there, but long term this was the play we literally paid a pick in the 30's worth for a guy who can genuinely ruck.
JVR has been better in defence, think many see him as a defender first and foremost. My view is if we don't get him that's fine, get a Sinn type, or Sons at our pick (whatever mid/running defender), then look at a defender at our second and there is a few around there.
Just don't want to see reaches if JVR is off the table.
He competed with Darcy which was promising, beat up on teams with no real ruck, and got toweled up by Grundy - so a mixed bag. He's still young for a ruck, but I think his prowess so far is being overstated.
Oh yeah I think we won that trade easily. I expect he'll be best 22 for a long time, but just maybe not as no.1 ruck. We'll have to use him as no.1 for a year or two in between Hickey and the kids probably, regardless. My list priorities were initially KPD, Ruck, KPF then looking at mids or general defenders. Since we picked up Ladhams, will get King next year, I think KPD is the only one that needs addressing in some way this year (while we wait to see how McLean, Amartey develop), so using a pick or two on mids/smalls is fine.At the price it's a free hit, we literally gave up a 3rd rounder for a ruck at 23 who has shown he can compete with the best of them. Like all rucks he's a year or two away at least and that's fine we have Hickey taking 80% for those two years.
Oh yeah I think we won that trade easily. I expect he'll be best 22 for a long time, but just maybe not as no.1 ruck. We'll have to use him as no.1 for a year or two in between Hickey and the kids probably, regardless. My list priorities were initially KPD, Ruck, KPF then looking at mids or general defenders. Since we picked up Ladhams, will get King next year, I think KPD is the only one that needs addressing in some way this year (while we wait to see how McLean, Amartey develop), so using a pick or two on mids/smalls is fine.
I'm hoping Hickey lasts the 2 years, that way we'll have McAndrew getting towards readiness, Amartey will be a known quantity (yes or no), and Ladhams will undoubtedly improve (the question is how much). King will still be a year or two away, but we'll hopefully have an A grader, plus a solid backup out of those 4.
Yeah there should be one or two of the 5 or 6 available, still there with pick 31ish, just depends on whether we see someone as daylight above the rest. I'd prefer we shuffle picks to get a couple in the 20s to do that, than use pick 18 for a reach, but it'll all depend on the clubs evaluations anyway.I’d also like a running defender it’s why if Sinn is there I’d take him. We can get a KPD at our second pick
Let's be realistic. Ladhams came to us because we were one of the few clubs willing to pay is back ended contract for next year. It's well known his manager approached the Dogs in addition to ourselves.Ladhams really wanting to come to us I see as a real positive. He's a top line ruckman and at the price we got was a free hit, a shift down in the first when there is stuff all between 10 and 25, meh.
Two KPD is overkill for me especially in a draft that is thin for them. Get one whether that be Van Rooyan or one in the second round, but that's it there's more next year.
Yeah there should be one or two of the 5 or 6 available, still there with pick 31ish, just depends on whether we see someone as daylight above the rest. I'd prefer we shuffle picks to get a couple in the 20s to do that, than use pick 18 for a reach, but it'll all depend on the clubs evaluations anyway.
Most young rucks get towelled up by Grundy. No shame there.He competed with Darcy which was promising, beat up on teams with no real ruck, and got toweled up by Grundy - so a mixed bag. He's still young for a ruck, but I think his prowess so far is being overstated.
With all the various mock drafts going around, Sinn has varied from pick 9 to our pick at 18.I’d also like a running defender it’s why if Sinn is there I’d take him. We can get a KPD at our second pick
Not at all, but I see people talking about how he was a star when he had about 4 games as no.1 ruck for Port. He wasn't, not even close. The competitiveness against Darcy was good, but I don't think you can take much from the other games.Most young rucks get towelled up by Grundy. No shame there.
I’d also like a running defender it’s why if Sinn is there I’d take him. We can get a KPD at our second pick
Why no interest in Darcy Wilmot? For all the hype Sinn carries, I still rate Wilmot higher as a running defender
We'll know soon enough.Let's be realistic. Ladhams came to us because we were one of the few clubs willing to pay is back ended contract for next year. It's well known his manager approached the Dogs in addition to ourselves.
We won the job interview, that's it. Whether he finally learns to apply himself, which has been an issue as far back as his draft year remains to be seen.
We'll know soon enough.
If he does, everything's coming up roses.
If not, chances are McLean and Amartey will be better because they DO apply themselves.
Sam banks is another with run and elite foot skills, he has missed a bit of footy but looks like he has alot of scope for improvement. Would be interested with our 3rd pick maybe?Why no interest in Darcy Wilmot? For all the hype Sinn carries, I still rate Wilmot higher as a running defender
Sam banks is another with run and elite foot skills, he has missed a bit of footy but looks like he has alot of scope for improvement. Would be interested with our 3rd pick maybe?
what i wouldn't do to get 5 minutes inside Kinnears head! This is just like Christmas, I hope you have all been nice! How many more sleeps?There is a few in that range it really depends how we approach it whether it is defenders first then the mids (or smalls) or do we take the defender at the second round. I expect if JVR is available I’d be shocked if he’s not called. Suits a need and would be best available anyway.
what i wouldn't do to get 5 minutes inside Kinnears head! This is just like Christmas, I hope you have all been nice! How many more sleeps?
No current season stats available
It's all academic. GWS are taking him.He wasn't delisted because he wasn't good, it was oppurtunity and position surplus.
I think Brander is really talented and is going to achieve that talent soon. McLean is a good tryer who I like but I take Brander every time until I see enough from either to change my mind.
Anyway this is all irrelevant as he has already signed elsewhere, I have just wanted him since his draft year. I think we draft him instead of Ling if WCE didn't swoop in.