Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If we have upgraded 3 rookies, it means that we are not necessarily required to take 3 selections in the draft. Everyone keeps mentioning that we will take Paddy and Anderson in the rookie draft but we have already guaranteed that we will resign Taylor as a rookie.The working assumption always is that by signing 2-year contracts McLean, Wicks and Sheather have all been upgraded to the senior list. This would mean we are running with a 37 man senior list (or a 38 man senior list if Clarke is signed for 2022) and opens up enough rookie list spots to actually be able to select Paddy and Anderson in the rookie draft.
Tom Brown feels exactly like the mistake we made with Ling.
I wouldn't worry. Twomey is notoriously bad at prediction regarding picks for the Swans. Mainly because we play our cards very close come draft time and there are very few if any leaks. That's not his fault by the way, but a lot of the so called 'predictions' are based on sources they have.Tom Brown feels exactly like the mistake we made with Ling.
If we have upgraded 3 rookies, it means that we are not necessarily required to take 3 selections in the draft. Everyone keeps mentioning that we will take Paddy and Anderson in the rookie draft but we have already guaranteed that we will resign Taylor as a rookie.
I wouldn't worry. Twomey is notoriously bad at prediction regarding picks for the Swans. Mainly because we play our cards very close come draft time and there are very few if any leaks. That's not his fault by the way, but a lot of the so called 'predictions' are based on sources they have.
Twomey's not the only one without a clue - this article by SEN says we're looking at McCartin - which is no secret. But other than that you'll notice that unlike other teams in the article, they don't name a single other player.
The mystery regarding our pick 70 though remains unsolved.
What your club must target in the 2021 National Draft
What does your club need at this year’s AFL National Draft?www.sen.com.au
I wouldn't worry. Twomey is notoriously bad at prediction regarding picks for the Swans. Mainly because we play our cards very close come draft time and there are very few if any leaks. That's not his fault by the way, but a lot of the so called 'predictions' are based on sources they have.
Twomey's not the only one without a clue - this article by SEN says we're looking at McCartin - which is no secret. But other than that you'll notice that unlike other teams in the article, they don't name a single other player.
The mystery regarding our pick 70 though remains unsolved.
What your club must target in the 2021 National Draft
What does your club need at this year’s AFL National Draft?www.sen.com.au
Surprised you're not rating Cunningham. He has shut down plenty in the last 2 seasons and is as consistent as. Plus he is a terrific kick. Makes very few mistakes.If we are relying on those as small defenders that's a red flag. It is a need albeit it's not one I'd sell the farm for. However if we take one this year I won't be complaining.
JMac for sure but having run top 3 for years as a defender I doubt Horse will shift Lloyd to a wing. JMac, Blakey, Gulden and Campbell are all better inside 50 kicks IMO.If it's Wilmot (who could also become a winger, outside mid or small defender) or Chesser (who could be wing or outside mid), I'm fine with that.
If they ended up solidifying a HB role, then JMac or Lloyd could fill a wing spot.
Don't think be knows our list very well either.I wouldn't worry. Twomey is notoriously bad at prediction regarding picks for the Swans. Mainly because we play our cards very close come draft time and there are very few if any leaks. That's not his fault by the way, but a lot of the so called 'predictions' are based on sources they have.
Twomey's not the only one without a clue - this article by SEN says we're looking at McCartin - which is no secret. But other than that you'll notice that unlike other teams in the article, they don't name a single other player.
The mystery regarding our pick 70 though remains unsolved.
What your club must target in the 2021 National Draft
What does your club need at this year’s AFL National Draft?www.sen.com.au
Surprised you're not rating Cunningham. He has shut down plenty in the last 2 seasons and is as consistent as. Plus he is a terrific kick. Makes very few mistakes.
Fox is handy rather than outstanding but is decent on all sizes, including smalls. He lost form and made some poor decisions towards the end of the season but was pretty good until then.
COR is a more traditional type mid sizer for sure.
The way our defence sets up I'm not sure that the traditional roles are as important as they were, except on the monsters.
If push came to shove I suspect there are a couple of guys who could convert to handy small defenders if necessary. Not that they SHOULD.
Wicks, Stephens, Sheather all are decent tacklers and quick on their feet.
I wouldn't recruit a small defender for all the tea in China. We just delisted 2.
Also the later in the draft the harder it is to predict. Twomey is usually very good with the top 10 but after that it begins to unravel as all it takes is one club to do something unexpected and all his predictions are suddenly off.
Last year it actually happened early with North picking Phillips though usually he is very good with the top 10.
I rather thought he was OUR Cunningham.There is rating and then there’s rating for a potential premiership side. Can your Cunningham shut down your Greene types? Look it’s not a number 1 need but if we take one I won’t be losing sleep. It will likely be a defender that could be a mid though. Not a fan but Wilmot is one option.
picks 6-76 are a bit of a lotterySounds like picks 6 to 25 is a bit of a lottery.
Probably why we weren't bothered going backwards 4 spots in the Ladhams trade.
Twomey's not the only one without a clue
If you're basing your opinion of a player on whether they can shut down Toby Greene you're not going to find any good players. Toby is one of the elite of the competition, and the reason he is is that he is so tough to shut down. Wouldn't be more than 2 players in the league that could shut him down, and even then I would back Greene on a big day.There is rating and then there’s rating for a potential premiership side. Can your Cunningham shut down your Greene types? Look it’s not a number 1 need but if we take one I won’t be losing sleep. It will likely be a defender that could be a mid though. Not a fan but Wilmot is one option.
Do you mean all but two of us do have a clue or the other way around?I just had a look at the 2019 draft thread, and Dylan Stephens is mentioned twice.
Greene shares with Rampe and a few others a weird thing that he plays a lot "bigger" than he is. A small defender isn't really big enough and a mid sized defender isn't really quick enough. Very difficult match up.If you're basing your opinion of a player on whether they can shut down Toby Greene you're not going to find any good players. Toby is one of the elite of the competition, and the reason he is is that he is so tough to shut down. Wouldn't be more than 2 players in the league that could shut him down, and even then I would back Greene on a big day.
If you're basing your opinion of a player on whether they can shut down Toby Greene you're not going to find any good players. Toby is one of the elite of the competition, and the reason he is is that he is so tough to shut down. Wouldn't be more than 2 players in the league that could shut him down, and even then I would back Greene on a big day.
Whilst true and I agree with you in regards to Toby, if we can improve a position we should regardless of whether it’s needed
Except needed has a higher priority over positional improvements.
So long as these are best available I’m happy enough.
At pick 18 you can probably throw a blanket over half a dozen players.