Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who knows with these kids though - they keep shooting up. He could very well end up a key position. Then on the other hand you had poor young Ferres who everyone assumed would keep growing but stopped dead in the tracks - ended up a key forward in a 190cm body last year.Cheers , I thought I had read he was a ruck.
Thanks for clarifying
The younger brother of Max. Already about 184 as a 15 yo. Very different to Max apparently. Max a junkyard dog, mean defender - Jack smoother, more like their dad. I’ll have a look myself soon though as this is all 2nd hand.Is the McLeod?
What do the numbers mean?After watching Sunday's game on replay (well about 3/4 of it) ... it reminded me this is what a proper rebuild is about.
Adding talent from higher draft picks.
Bringing in talent through trades and free-agency.
Finding talent where you didn't realise it was.
And really really important - Replacing potential that has not delivered.
We have a bunch of young players that have probably shown enough that the next 10 or so weeks will start to solidify their position in or out of the team ... and a few that we can start actively moving to the "back to the SANFL" category.
Imo, after Round 1 2022, our 22 and unders:
Better options on our list.
Hately (16) - definition of unrealised potential
Jones (38) - I'm not sure if he can establish himself in the 22 long term. He is not a midfielder. He panics on the hb flank. We do not need him up forward or on the wing. Getting a bit hard to bend the team to find a spot for him imo.
McPherson (26) - Just not reliable enough.
Showed enough
Berry (17)
Butts (25)
Cook (3)
Fogarty (41)
Gollant (1)
Hamill (25)
McHenry (30)
Murray (11)
Pedlar (2)
Rachele (1)
Rowe (19)
Shoenberg (31)
Sholl (27)
Soligo (1)
Strachan (3)
Thilthorpe (15)
More time needed - watch this space
Borlase (0)
McAsey (10) - big guys need more time?
Nankervis (0)
Newchurch (0)
Parnell (0)
Taylor (0)
Worrell (1)
Of the over 22s that I'm putting / keeping in the SANFL as "break glass" options:
Himmelberg (28) - Sorry, lots to like but does not take enough marks / kick enough goals / positive influence on contests for his position.
Davis (6) - Don't know, he has some great qualities - good to have on your list, but not best 22
Frampton (18) - cheap backup
Thoughts?
games played..What do the numbers mean?
Also Max as a 17 year old is 194cm needs to fill out and going by dad's build he should - Jack has grown up with a football and has had to compete with the older brothers should be promising.The younger brother of Max. Already about 184 as a 15 yo. Very different to Max apparently. Max a junkyard dog, mean defender - Jack smoother, more like their dad. I’ll have a look myself soon though as this is all 2nd hand.
Good write up. I am a huge fan of Jones but if he can’t become a good regular player, it will be hard to keep him. He has all the tools to become good but he hasn’t.After watching Sunday's game on replay (well about 3/4 of it) ... it reminded me this is what a proper rebuild is about.
Adding talent from higher draft picks.
Bringing in talent through trades and free-agency.
Finding talent where you didn't realise it was.
And really really important - Replacing potential that has not delivered.
We have a bunch of young players that have probably shown enough that the next 10 or so weeks will start to solidify their position in or out of the team ... and a few that we can start actively moving to the "back to the SANFL" category.
Imo, after Round 1 2022, our 22 and unders:
Better options on our list.
Hately (16) - definition of unrealised potential
Jones (38) - I'm not sure if he can establish himself in the 22 long term. He is not a midfielder. He panics on the hb flank. We do not need him up forward or on the wing. Getting a bit hard to bend the team to find a spot for him imo.
McPherson (26) - Just not reliable enough.
Showed enough
Berry (17)
Butts (25)
Cook (3)
Fogarty (41)
Gollant (1)
Hamill (25)
McHenry (30)
Murray (11)
Pedlar (2)
Rachele (1)
Rowe (19)
Shoenberg (31)
Sholl (27)
Soligo (1)
Strachan (3)
Thilthorpe (15)
More time needed - watch this space
Borlase (0)
McAsey (10) - big guys need more time?
Nankervis (0)
Newchurch (0)
Parnell (0)
Taylor (0)
Worrell (1)
Of the over 22s that I'm putting / keeping in the SANFL as "break glass" options:
Himmelberg (28) - Sorry, lots to like but does not take enough marks / kick enough goals / positive influence on contests for his position.
Davis (6) - Don't know, he has some great qualities - good to have on your list, but not best 22
Frampton (18) - cheap backup
Thoughts?
Are there any realistic free agents we can get this year?
I’d like to go to the draft one more year and use our first on a classy mid who has composure.
I’d like to use our second on the best key position forward .
And I’d like a developing ruck .
Delist/Trade/Retire: Berg, Walker , Murphy, Davis
Hope Seed is ok, otherwise put him on the rookie list .
Hately on thin ice.
After watching Sunday's game on replay (well about 3/4 of it) ... it reminded me this is what a proper rebuild is about.
Adding talent from higher draft picks.
Bringing in talent through trades and free-agency.
Finding talent where you didn't realise it was.
And really really important - Replacing potential that has not delivered.
We have a bunch of young players that have probably shown enough that the next 10 or so weeks will start to solidify their position in or out of the team ... and a few that we can start actively moving to the "back to the SANFL" category.
Imo, after Round 1 2022, our 22 and unders:
Better options on our list.
Hately (16) - definition of unrealised potential
Jones (38) - I'm not sure if he can establish himself in the 22 long term. He is not a midfielder. He panics on the hb flank. We do not need him up forward or on the wing. Getting a bit hard to bend the team to find a spot for him imo.
McPherson (26) - Just not reliable enough.
Showed enough
Berry (17)
Butts (25)
Cook (3)
Fogarty (41)
Gollant (1)
Hamill (25)
McHenry (30)
Murray (11)
Pedlar (2)
Rachele (1)
Rowe (19)
Shoenberg (31)
Sholl (27)
Soligo (1)
Strachan (3)
Thilthorpe (15)
More time needed - watch this space
Borlase (0)
McAsey (10) - big guys need more time?
Nankervis (0)
Newchurch (0)
Parnell (0)
Taylor (0)
Worrell (1)
Of the over 22s that I'm putting / keeping in the SANFL as "break glass" options:
Himmelberg (28) - Sorry, lots to like but does not take enough marks / kick enough goals / positive influence on contests for his position.
Davis (6) - Don't know, he has some great qualities - good to have on your list, but not best 22
Frampton (18) - cheap backup
Thoughts?
I reckon that we can't rely on getting talented players through trades/FA (assuming talented means potentially elite players like Rachele/Tilly/...) - except in rare occasions when talented players want to come home to SA for some reason (eg. Dawson).After watching Sunday's game on replay (well about 3/4 of it) ... it reminded me this is what a proper rebuild is about.
Adding talent from higher draft picks.
Bringing in-talent-useful players through trades and free-agency.
Finding talent where you didn't realise it was.
And really really important - Replacing potential that has not delivered.
We have a bunch of young players that have probably shown enough that the next 10 or so weeks will start to solidify their position in or out of the team ... and a few that we can start actively moving to the "back to the SANFL" category.
Imo, after Round 1 2022, our 22 and unders:
Better options on our list.
I fear for Hamills health. I think he should start wearing a helmet, as it may at least offer some protection.After watching Sunday's game on replay (well about 3/4 of it) ... it reminded me this is what a proper rebuild is about.
Adding talent from higher draft picks.
Bringing in talent through trades and free-agency.
Finding talent where you didn't realise it was.
And really really important - Replacing potential that has not delivered.
We have a bunch of young players that have probably shown enough that the next 10 or so weeks will start to solidify their position in or out of the team ... and a few that we can start actively moving to the "back to the SANFL" category.
Imo, after Round 1 2022, our 22 and unders:
Better options on our list.
Hately (16) - definition of unrealised potential
Jones (38) - I'm not sure if he can establish himself in the 22 long term. He is not a midfielder. He panics on the hb flank. We do not need him up forward or on the wing. Getting a bit hard to bend the team to find a spot for him imo.
McPherson (26) - Just not reliable enough.
Showed enough
Berry (17)
Butts (25)
Cook (3)
Fogarty (41)
Gollant (1)
Hamill (25)
McHenry (30)
Murray (11)
Pedlar (2)
Rachele (1)
Rowe (19)
Shoenberg (31)
Sholl (27)
Soligo (1)
Strachan (3)
Thilthorpe (15)
More time needed - watch this space
Borlase (0)
McAsey (10) - big guys need more time?
Nankervis (0)
Newchurch (0)
Parnell (0)
Taylor (0)
Worrell (1)
Of the over 22s that I'm putting / keeping in the SANFL as "break glass" options:
Himmelberg (28) - Sorry, lots to like but does not take enough marks / kick enough goals / positive influence on contests for his position.
Davis (6) - Don't know, he has some great qualities - good to have on your list, but not best 22
Frampton (18) - cheap backup
Thoughts?
i’d class most picks after 40 as massive speculators.. odds are very high that you are gonna end up with a fail many more times than you will a win.. sure, there is diamonds in the rough from pick 40 onwards but they are rare.Geezus you post some absolutely cringeworthy posts in relation to our players.
I love how you can put it down and to a couple of bad first half disposals.I love how many people have jumped off Jones after a couple of bad first half disposals.
It shows how ridiculously knee jerk this board is.
(Cue: "I never rated him" etc etc)
Not at all but there is worry if he will make it now. This wasnt just one bad game, the last year and a bit has to be concerning. If he doesn’t make it at half back, where to then.I love how many people have jumped off Jones after a couple of bad first half disposals.
It shows how ridiculously knee jerk this board is.
(Cue: "I never rated him" etc etc)
He looked very good the last third of last year.Not at all but there is worry if he will make it now. This wasnt just one bad game, the last year and a bit has to be concerning. If he doesn’t make it at half back, where to then.
Yep, had two bad kicks in the first half. Improved in the second.I love how you can put it down and to a couple of bad first half disposals.
It shows how ridiculous the club ambassadors on this board are.
Yep, had two bad kicks in the first half. Improved in the second.
Had some good handballs in close and offered a lot of contested pressure.
But I guess the kneejerkers have gotta jerk.
Haven't seen any club ambassadors around here. Just a mix of some people who are showing patience with a group of kids, and other who whinged for a rebuild for years and now are whinging that it doesn't happen overnight.
You would think there wouldn't be too much difference between a pick 6 and a pick 9 but after just one AFL match there appears a world of difference if you look at Rachele and Jones.I love how many people have jumped off Jones after a couple of bad first half disposals.
It shows how ridiculously knee jerk this board is.
(Cue: "I never rated him" etc etc)
Not having Campo and Godden teaching in you 1st couple of seasons is also a differenceYou would think there wouldn't be too much difference between a pick 6 and a pick 9 but after just one AFL match there appears a world of difference if you look at Rachele and Jones.
Whoosh.Yep, had two bad kicks in the first half. Improved in the second.
Had some good handballs in close and offered a lot of contested pressure.
But I guess the kneejerkers have gotta jerk.
Haven't seen any club ambassadors around here. Just a mix of some people who are showing patience with a group of kids, and other who whinged for a rebuild for years and now are whinging that it doesn't happen overnight.
That game against west coast was outstanding but we need more from Jones. Has all the tools to become a star. For our sake, I hope he doesn’t waste that talent and become an average playerHe looked very good the last third of last year.
I played rugby with a helmet thinking it would stop concussions sadly they do dick all for concussions, they stop some of the scrapes and cuts but thats all. The issue is that it doesnt stop the brain bouncing around. Also for people who have had lots of concussions general body hits can exasperate concussions. So its a delicate line to walkI fear for Hamills health. I think he should start wearing a helmet, as it may at least offer some protection