Grav
Norm Smith Medallist
- May 10, 2013
- 8,837
- 31,946
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Melbourne Storm, Baghdadian Babes
Actually surprisingly good.“Built to be an inside mid but with lightning pace”
Sounds incredible. How’s his kicking
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually surprisingly good.“Built to be an inside mid but with lightning pace”
Sounds incredible. How’s his kicking
We had pick one in the PSDDidn't try to keep him, was basically pushed out otherwise he would still be a swan.
Well hardly, but players don’t leave big, well run clubs if they’re not getting lowballed. ( Well, unless you are Hanners). He’s played all his footy there and wouldn’t really want to leave. He’s not being low-balled by them - they initially withdrew their offer but the way he’s played recently there’s no way they’re losing him - it’s all welcome home, Jordy, all is forgiven.What Collingwood benefits?
You think JDG is going to get a job at JB Weir as a market analyst when he retires?
Once his footy is finished so is his ability to earn.
“Built to be an inside mid but with lightning pace”
Sounds incredible. How’s his kicking
Nah, Membrey chose to leave when he knew Goodes was re-signing for another yr. Didn’t want to waste another season just dominating in the Swans reserves. Was easily AFL standard but for structure, was never going to be bumping Goodes out of the seniorsDidn't try to keep him, was basically pushed out otherwise he would still be a swan.
Not seeing the big picture.How about no. I want at least a top 10 pick for Clark, a top 20 for Hill and all his salary off the books, a 2nd for Long.
That is the definition of being pushed.We had pick one in the PSD
Sydney delisted him so that he could start training with us right away
He left for opportunity as he was behind Buddy, Reid and Tippet, but he wasn't pushed.
He was offered a contract but asked to be tradedThat is the definition of being pushed.
So what does the D stand for in DFA?Nah, Membrey chose to leave when he knew Goodes was re-signing for another yr. Didn’t want to waste another season just dominating in the Swans reserves. Was easily AFL standard but for structure, was never going to be bumping Goodes out of the seniors
It's really not. They wanted him to stay but knew he was gone and they didn't have a say.That is the definition of being pushed.
Like Acres? Two year contract at minimum, but hey not pushed out.He was offered a contract but asked to be traded
No, that not how it works.So what does the D stand for in DFA?
He was delisted, simple as that. I know the reasons, but if Swans wanted to keep him, one of the others would have been delisted.
If they didn't want him, they would have delisted him to begin with instead.Like Acres? Two year contract at minimum, but hey not pushed out.
At the risk of going all Gringo let me tell you about Paddy the Irish businessman:We are talking about selling off a guy to "clear space" that we paid a fortune for in dollars and trade capital and the club wants us to trust that the people who would make these decisions are on the ball. You are trying to sell this as some kind of positive. It's a diabolical * up, like cashing in your super to buy Crypto at the peak and telling everyone how clever you are getting 5 cents in the dollar back.
Clark is the guy we have invested 5 years of hope in and as our highest pick that year and one of the few first rounders, we hope he's one that might come good and carry us forward. Again, we picked him and now we're hoping we can cash him in, likely for less than we paid.
It looks a lot like stalling for time because they've fallen short again, They can sell missing finals next year on all the kids and not have to face any consequences for their failures. This footy department is racking up more * ups than wins at the moment and really needs a torch shined on them.
If you can't see how people would be upset by the club n this situation you don't really understand psychology.
Quinton Narkle?Anyway, I'm not against us taking a DFA or two, as long as they aren't 30 years old.
There have been some handy ones over the years, but it needs to be a young player with some upside.
Same with BillingsThe St.Kilda problem is that we get young guys with promise, over pay them early and they get lazy thinking they’ve made it.
Yeah Hunts has had some bad injuries but he’s put on next to no muscle, has an awful tank and runs like he’s in quicksand.
If he puts in the work and builds his tank and can go through the middle it won’t matter that he can’t run, he’ll be Pendles like.
But he’s come in and been spoon fed as an early draft pick and hasn’t had to work for it
So we’re now discussing Jones to half back?!
That’ll ******* do me. You don’t put the worst field kick in the team as your rebounding half back
Yeah, true, Wood and Membrey, both spuds
Delist.
Seriously though, we don't go for delisted, that happens for a reason.
If we go down the path stav suggested, it is a direct admission the trading hasn't worked.
If we got two top dps it doesn't necessarily mean two to three years waiting. They seemed much more developed these days.
Not one of Windy, Naz or Owens looked out of place in the seniors first year, with Windy looking a long way developed.
At the risk of going all Gringo let me tell you about Paddy the Irish businessman:
-bought watermelons at the farm for 10 cents a Kg, parked on the side of the road and sold them for 9 cents a kg.
Said that the only thing stopping him making money was the unimaginative bank manager who wouldn't loan him money for a bigger truck!
Pretty sure that Paddy is now in charge of our player trading!
Owens and Windy were fast tracked through the academy. I heard it discussed on SEN last year, that academy kids come in about 1 to 2 years ahead of kids who only have their school and TAC footy. They get access to all the staff and equipment that seniors get and train along side them which mentally makes it easier. That seems to check out to me. Nas was good but to me looked tired a lot earlier and dropped off a bit after a good start.
Actually surprisingly good.
Does that mean that what we see with McKenzie, is essentially a year ahead of the other guys we are looking at?
I just don't see the logic in what you're saying might happen.And both opinions aren’t unreasonable.
It makes sense to trade him if we got a Cerra offer as it’s not a loss based on the last 18 months. Takes the pressure off him and us.
Resets the list demographic if we say added 5, 18 year olds in the top 30 in place of Geary Hanners Kent Ryder Joyce