List Mgmt. 2024 List Mismanagement and Trading Part 2

[FR0GGY]

George Kramer did you write that article?

 

[George Kramer]

George Kramer did you write that article?

Which article?

 

[FR0GGY]

Which article?

The one before my post, where the gave us a B+

 

[George Kramer]

The one before my post

You’re not trying to get me to look at ignored content are you or is it the one Kane posted?

 

[George Kramer]

The one before my post, where the gave us a B+

The journo needs to get out of the basement and smash more drinks

 

[FR0GGY]

You’re not trying to get me to look at ignored content are you or is it the one Kane posted?

One from the age apparently

 

[Shifty Crow]

If Nicks approaches the season with a finals or bust style attitude like he had midway through 2023 he will keep Curtin, Dowling, Bond and Taylor out of the team as much as possible in favour of senior players. I do suspect that this is how it will play out pending injuries of course. Nicks is at risk of being moved on at the end of the year if his results dont improve. So i do certainly expect an all out assault on finals.

With out inclusions Dowling and Taylor are probably just outside of of best 23

Taylor the more likely for round 1 IMO


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Shifty Crow]

Very generous to Port there. I'd say D.
Atkins........ really????

Fox Footy gave Port a C-


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Caputo]

Happy with the price we paid for Peatling. Thought we would have to pay a F2 and get nothing back. Hately deal probably helped if we threatened to take Peating in PSD, we have form with GWS.

 

[DJ75]

I'm not a fan of Reid, but you have to say that this years trade period has been a big win.

We brought in 3 players who will all be first 18 and will all make us stronger. We did so without giving away much, and maintained our top draft pick. If we get that pick right, this off season could be the pivotal point that propels us into contention.

So I would give the incoming players an A grade.

On the negative side, we didn't address a clear need in having a developing ruck, we also limited what other moves we could make by filling our list with unnecessary contracts.

So I think overall I would give it an A-. Good, but not perfect.