-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
List Mgmt. 2024 List Mismanagement and Trading Part 2
- Thread starter 1990crow
- Start date
- Tagged users None
So, our confirmed (papers lodged) list changes are:
IN: Cumming, T Murray (R)
OUT: Sloane, Himmelberg, McHenry, Gollant, Parnell (R), Hamill (R)
Interesting that they chose to make these announcements now, just before the start of the trading period. They've obviously given up any hope of finding trades for these players.
This leaves Burgess as the only player still in limbo, pending the outcome of the trading period.
IN: Cumming, T Murray (R)
OUT: Sloane, Himmelberg, McHenry, Gollant, Parnell (R), Hamill (R)
Interesting that they chose to make these announcements now, just before the start of the trading period. They've obviously given up any hope of finding trades for these players.
This leaves Burgess as the only player still in limbo, pending the outcome of the trading period.
Burgess not necessarily staying - they just haven't made a final decision about him, pending the outcome of the trading period. They want to see what picks they end up with before making a final decision. Burgess remains in limbo for the next 2 weeks.
- Moderator
- #1,859
I would have kept Gollant over Burgess, but clearly we must have stupidly signed Burgess to a long term deal when we traded him in.
- Mar 3, 2022
- 6,008
- 8,309
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Ned and Patrick just too small and never did enough damage. Thing to remember about Ned is it wasnt his fault he was drafted where he was, dummy recruiters with a hard on for small mids.
Hamill you just can't carry in the modern day with concussion front of mind. Can't pay a bloke all year to sit out again, its only a matter of time.
Gollant had more than enough chances and just never seized them or looked likely.
Hamill you just can't carry in the modern day with concussion front of mind. Can't pay a bloke all year to sit out again, its only a matter of time.
Gollant had more than enough chances and just never seized them or looked likely.
I was thinking if all we have is Pick 4. Welsh would come in before our third round pick? I can’t see us taking a pick on the 4th round
Unless we get a future second back somehow we can't use our F1 to get additional picks this year?
You are much more across it than me so happy to be corrected
Nah... Burgess is still in limbo. We could still delist him, or keep him, depending on what picks we end up with after trade week.
There are still many permutations - both in terms of what picks are involved in the Peatling/ANB trades, and any pick swaps we can engineer.
... we also don't really know how early any Welsh bid is likely to come. Probably not in the top-30, but it's hard to make predictions beyond that. It's not outside the realms of possibility that nobody bids on him at all.
- Aug 28, 2006
- 2,177
- 3,276
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Burgess 100% has another year to run on his contract, with Berg going no way we delist him
TubbsFarquhar
TheBrownDog
No surprises here. Ned seems like a great guy, but unfortunately, not AFL quality.
Hamill had some nice weapons, but injuries and being behind the pecking order hurt him. Six years is plenty anyway.
Gollant will have a great state league career, but is in the Hosie mold of just not being tall enough to play KPP.
This also pretty much confirms that Burgess had another year added on when we signed him, but he's not safe yet (although I'm starting to think we keep him after Berg's departure).
Wonder if Gollant gets a spot somewhere else?
I agree with all of that. I don't think any of them could say they didn't have chances. Some like Hamill probably got a year or two longer that they normally would.
Really stupid list decision in true to trade pick 25 for ANB, surely a third would suffice. He’s 29 next year I think. Surely we could trade pick 25 and future third for an early pick and get Dodson considering we need a ruckman
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Shifty Crow
All Australian
- Jul 30, 2024
- 636
- 1,251
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Why?
Is been largely ineffective at AFL level
Just doesn’t have the strength
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Very doubtful. They wouldn't have announced his departure today (before trade week) if there was any hope of finding a new home for these players.
Shifty Crow
All Australian
- Jul 30, 2024
- 636
- 1,251
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Ned, joins McAsey and Gallucci and 1st round picks no longer playing AFL
Maybe Ned gets picked up?
Not to mention - zero draft picks as AA
People point the gun at Nicks but when does Hamish get the bullet ?
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Maybe Ned gets picked up?
Not to mention - zero draft picks as AA
People point the gun at Nicks but when does Hamish get the bullet ?
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
I reckon he will as a rookie.
Okay, with these delistings, we now officially have 4 list spots on the senior list and 1 rookie spot.
We now either need 2 players demoted to the rookie list (and Keane upgraded), Burgess is the final delisting, or a contracted player is being traded.
We now either need 2 players demoted to the rookie list (and Keane upgraded), Burgess is the final delisting, or a contracted player is being traded.
Or more delistings
- Thread starter
- #1,875
There has to be players getting demoted to the rookie list or a player getting traded.
Smith, Strachan and Schoenberg obvious options. There'd be no interest across the comp for any of them so could delist comfortably.
It does seem Burgess is OOC too.
Pick 4, Welsh, rookie upgrade (Keane), Peatling, ANB, Cumming is 6 changes minimum.
So at this stage Burgess and one rookie list demotion must happen as it stands.
If we get pick 12/16 Keane just doesn't get upgraded.
If we get another player (seems unlikely), it becomes minimum 7 changes and 2 rookie demotions.
Similar threads
- Poll
