List Mgmt. 2024 List Mismanagement and Trading

Should the AFC offer Taylor Walker a contract for 2025?


  • Total voters
    40
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Me checking the AFC socials for this year's delistings every morning.

Confused Orlando Airport GIF by Orlando International Airport (MCO)
 
I haven't seen Bearded Clam, using his impeccable player judgement, to lambast Ben Keays recently ......could it be he was wrong about being a useless footballer, delist insistent.

We eagerly await his next kiss of death assessment .....will be a Brownlow certainty on Clams performance

View attachment 2105718
Pretty poor to have a crack at someones judgment when you are so far up a 30% winning record, coach, its not funny.
 
Pretty poor to have a crack at someones judgment when you are so far up a 30% winning record, coach, its not funny.
You are being very generous if you think WW has a 30% winning posting record...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Imagine if we lost ROB for the year then our back up ruck in sanfl can get thru about 45 mins of senior footy before he gets tired

Then our next option could be our star key forward

Then the next guy was taken in the mid season draft and is more a forward
I'd be tempted next year in that situation to put Nick into ruck and reshape our defence to cover
 
Are you talking next year ? .....how long do we want to experiment with players, because if that's the mindset, you're never going to achieve anything

GEEL have no issues keeping their rooks / trades in the VFL for long periods .....I know you're well aware of the Mannagh & Humphries stories ....patience has its rewards

You don’t even know what you’re arguing half the time do you?

Obviously moving forward Thilthorpe, Fogarty and hopefully Lukosius are our key forwards.

However, in the next 1-2 years, if those guys are injured, how would having Burgess/Borlase/Gollant replacing them benefit us? Given we’re both in agreement that we aren’t ready from a list profile perspective.

If instead, an 18-19 year old who maybe has potential gets a crack, what’s the harm? Even still, we could just run with a small forward line like the Hawks did at various stages this year, and make ourselves more versatile.

The issue with keeping so many players on as depth at this stage of our development is that it prevents us from investing list spots in finding new talent.

Take Port and Hawthorn’s ruck situations as an example, Port had Visentini, Soldo and Sweet on their list. It obviously looks like Sweet is the guy but they needed 3 list spots to be able to roll the dice and see which one worked out. Hawthorn had Reeves, Lynch and Meek, obviously Meek is the guy but they haven’t always known that. They needed to create list spots to find out, otherwise maybe they only end up with one, let’s say Lynch, and it doesn’t work out.

This off season we’re hoping to get Lukosius, Cumming, ANB and a first round pick in. That’s four players, if we then want to invest in let’s say a couple rookie listed rucks as we really need to, where do those list spots come from if we insist on keeping the likes of Hamill, McHenry and Gollant?
 
You don’t even know what you’re arguing half the time do you?

Obviously moving forward Thilthorpe, Fogarty and hopefully Lukosius are our key forwards.

However, in the next 1-2 years, if those guys are injured, how would having Burgess/Borlase/Gollant replacing them benefit us? Given we’re both in agreement that we aren’t ready from a list profile perspective.

If instead, an 18-19 year old who maybe has potential gets a crack, what’s the harm? Even still, we could just run with a small forward line like the Hawks did at various stages this year, and make ourselves more versatile.

The issue with keeping so many players on as depth at this stage of our development is that it prevents us from investing list spots in finding new talent.

Take Port and Hawthorn’s ruck situations as an example, Port had Visentini, Soldo and Sweet on their list. It obviously looks like Sweet is the guy but they needed 3 list spots to be able to roll the dice and see which one worked out. Hawthorn had Reeves, Lynch and Meek, obviously Meek is the guy but they haven’t always known that. They needed to create list spots to find out, otherwise maybe they only end up with one, let’s say Lynch, and it doesn’t work out.

This off season we’re hoping to get Lukosius, Cumming, ANB and a first round pick in. That’s four players, if we then want to invest in let’s say a couple rookie listed rucks as we really need to, where do those list spots come from if we insist on keeping the likes of Hamill, McHenry and Gollant?
just assume they're all going. they are...
 
Why do we pick players in the MSD if we arent going to play them or dont know what to do with them
Have a look at cadman. He hardly got played in his first year either
curtin had injuries and little preseason. we all wanted to see him but tbh he didn't look ready when he did come in. doesn't mean he didn't show some little things of extreme talent. next year will be different barring injury
 
It was fascinating and extremely insightful listening to Chris Scott on AFL 360 last night.

Regardless of what you think of him, he's taken Geelong to 9 Prelims in his 14 years there. Wow.

He made an excellent point that he 'has always had great assistant coaches around him since' in his time there. Went on to say that Geelong 'Don't expect early draft picks' so instead 'put lots of resources and emphasis on development coaches and structures'.

Who would have thought right??? I hope someone from the AFC was listening to this.
 
It was fascinating and extremely insightful listening to Chris Scott on AFL 360 last night.

Regardless of what you think of him, he's taken Geelong to 9 Prelims in his 14 years there. Wow.

He made an excellent point that he 'has always had great assistant coaches around him since' in his time there. Went on to say that Geelong 'Don't expect early draft picks' so instead 'put lots of resources and emphasis on development coaches and structures'.

Who would have thought right??? I hope someone from the AFC was listening to this.
What would Scott know?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Why did we pick Curtin in the main drafter, if we didn't know what to do with him? ;)
Unfortunately we don't have a very smart coaching group... which sadly is why we are going nowhere under Nicks.

Seriously how many examples do AFC need that he just isn't up to it & never will be.
 
It was fascinating and extremely insightful listening to Chris Scott on AFL 360 last night.

Regardless of what you think of him, he's taken Geelong to 9 Prelims in his 14 years there. Wow.

He made an excellent point that he 'has always had great assistant coaches around him since' in his time there. Went on to say that Geelong 'Don't expect early draft picks' so instead 'put lots of resources and emphasis on development coaches and structures'.

Who would have thought right??? I hope someone from the AFC was listening to this.
You can tell just by listening to coaches those who know what they are doing with a clear plan & those who offer no substance as they have nfi.
 
And I might add the more centre bounces the player attends the likelihood their percentage would worsen?
It's like scoring 100 in your debut test against Bangladesh and claiming to be better than Bradman
The sample size was ridiculously cherry picked
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top