![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/north_melbourne.png)
will get off when he throws in good bloke clause.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney Swans vs GWS Giants - 3:20PM Sat - 1st QF
Squiggle tips Swans at 63% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
LIVE: Brisbane Lions vs Carlton - 7:30PM Sat - 1st EF
Squiggle tips Lions at 73% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
AFLW 2024 - Round 2 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think it’s been said before but this has been engineered in a way to give him the wiggle room to get the charge downgraded to a fine.Didn’t Webster have a broken nose? Low impact?
Probably couldn’t argue it down to a fine if the AFL go with medium force?AFL is so rigged.
Intentional conduct?…,,,
They’ll argue it was careless, and it was. Webster lowered his body, causing strike to his face. Meaning Heeney will probably get off.
Low impact?….,, Webster had a smashed nose with blood streaming out and the trainer straight onto him. Had to be medium impact.
Contact was high. The only one they got correct
Spot onProbably couldn’t argue it down to a fine if the AFL go with medium force?
It’s an engineered charge with the sole intention of him taking it to the tribunal and getting it downgraded to a fine.
The system is a sham that grades the charges in a way to get them what they want.
They’d need to have argued both intent and force.Probably couldn’t argue it down to a fine if the AFL go with medium force?
It’s an engineered charge with the sole intention of him taking it to the tribunal and getting it downgraded to a fine.
The system is a sham that grades the charges in a way to get them what they want.
The Swans just need to come up with something, anything and the AFL will work with them to get the desired result .
In the video we can see that Webster was bent over forwards with his head down low so the MRO determines that as low impact.Probably couldn’t argue it down to a fine if the AFL go with medium force?
It’s an engineered charge with the sole intention of him taking it to the tribunal and getting it downgraded to a fine.
The system is a sham that grades the charges in a way to get them what they want.
They don’t have to come up with anything.The Swans just need to come up with something, anything and the AFL will work with them to get the desired result .
I think he deserves to get off, and that has absolutely nothing to do with the bet I put on him at $101 to win the Brownlow. Nothing at all." in light of the distress the sacking of Adam Simpson at West Coast has caused Issac, he is free to play this week "
The weasel words give them the perfect out.They don’t have to come up with anything.
The pathway handed to them is having it down graded from intentional to careless.
Which they will.
Which makes the reworded rule not worth the lawyers fees to reword it.
Agree. The wording has the "usually" clause which is a complete nonsense. The swans just have to argue that this is an unusual case as the Webster left his head at the usual waist level, so the contact, althought high, would "usually" be at the body.They don’t have to come up with anything.
The pathway handed to them is having it down graded from intentional to careless.
Which they will.
Which makes the reworded rule not worth the lawyers fees to reword it.
You can drop F bombs in press conferences but not on the ground.You can’t whack someone in the face especially off the ball and draw blood it’s that simple
Otherwise let’s start whacking swans players in the face this week and hope the kids at Auskick do the same