- Aug 24, 2006
- 9,439
- 8,131
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Obviously we choose the HBF ones.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
List Mgmt. 2024 Trade Thread - No.3
- Thread starter SainterinSydney
- Start date
- Tagged users None
akaifu
Club Legend
- Feb 4, 2023
- 1,697
- 5,406
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
akaifu
Club Legend
- Feb 4, 2023
- 1,697
- 5,406
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Tom Morris said there were rumours of a potential backflip this morning but in the end we put it to bed
If they don't need the $800 000 elsewhere it makes no difference.
Just like if you took an $800 000 player from us, we'd need to find someone else to spend the money on.
They may be happy to use McCrustacean as a salary dump, knowing that the cap will free up in a short number of years.
Let's just get Parker then with 47.
- May 6, 2009
- 10,583
- 25,478
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
I don't think that's correct- other sources are saying swans want a second rounder for parker
(unless im mistaken- 44 is a 3rd round pick?):
Even if 44 is a 2nd rounder(?)
Rawlings saying 'a fair way apart' wouldnt be over the difference between 62 and 44- that is in noones language 'a fair way apart'.
62 vs 24- THAT'S 'a fair way apart'
Last edited:
- May 29, 2013
- 5,288
- 13,180
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- May 6, 2009
- 10,583
- 25,478
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Let's just get Parker then with 47.
Great... except the swans (currently) want a second rounder for him
13 may be there still...
There's a lot of desperation out there and prices are very high.
It was the same last year that people got ruffled at the perceived lack of action yet it was (IIRC) perhaps our best combined trade/draft season this millennium.
To be fair Pies were making out like bandits on that. Imo
IMO if they’re both available you take them both. They may be similar (I don’t know, not an expert) but you’re basically guaranteed that one won’t make it so taking both makes it more likely you end up with at least one good mid.
Yep, like that combo a lot. I want Smillie. In general we are undersized. Would love an absolute clearance bull. Kid is a unit.
I am going off highlights only, but Reid looks unreal to me. Pendles type player. These two would be incredible.
People will complain about speed, but we have outside speed with Henry and Wilson. Both could occasionally roll through the middle.
Two absolute ball pigs, we would be in great shape if we pull that off.
Actually, looking at it again, port get screwed
Last edited:
So correct me if I am wrong here, but as it stands we are actively shopping for extra picks in this draft.
With our F1 + F2 we tried:
Ess at 9 - beaten by Melbourne with a future first AND 5 round 2/3/4 picks this year
GC at 13 - beaten by either a North first rounder or a port / coll 3way that involves alot of already interested players / picks
So moving down the list of potentially available picks (and ignoring later pick swaps) our realistic options would be:
For 8+27+F1:
Carlton at 12+14
For 27, F1+ F2:
Tigers at 11
For 8 + 27
Giants at 15+16+21
For F1:
Sydney at 19+22
The one that jumps of the page for me is Richmond. They want to spread picks over 2 drafts to minimise risk, and they are already picking at at least 1 and 6. So we offer our 2025 draft hand (roughly a pick between 6-12 & 23-29) for 11 this year. Given what Ess and GC got for their pick, that offer probably isn't enough to tempt Richmond. So I added 27 (not sure we have anything else they would want).
Relies on them getting Rioli, Baker and Bolton done. And I am also sure they would try for the same deal with the later Bolton pick, not the first one.
But something like 27,F1+F2 to Rich for 11 as our next offer?
If so, I can see why we are trying to get involved in the Baker / WCE deal. Gets us into the conversation by trying to be helpful.
But for me our interest in that deal shouldn't be about upgrading to the WCE pick 3 from 7 or 8. It should be about trying to get the earlier pick that comes from the Bolton deal (ie 11) out of Richmond and over to us to add to 7/8.
Just where I would look at this stage
With our F1 + F2 we tried:
Ess at 9 - beaten by Melbourne with a future first AND 5 round 2/3/4 picks this year
GC at 13 - beaten by either a North first rounder or a port / coll 3way that involves alot of already interested players / picks
So moving down the list of potentially available picks (and ignoring later pick swaps) our realistic options would be:
For 8+27+F1:
Carlton at 12+14
For 27, F1+ F2:
Tigers at 11
For 8 + 27
Giants at 15+16+21
For F1:
Sydney at 19+22
The one that jumps of the page for me is Richmond. They want to spread picks over 2 drafts to minimise risk, and they are already picking at at least 1 and 6. So we offer our 2025 draft hand (roughly a pick between 6-12 & 23-29) for 11 this year. Given what Ess and GC got for their pick, that offer probably isn't enough to tempt Richmond. So I added 27 (not sure we have anything else they would want).
Relies on them getting Rioli, Baker and Bolton done. And I am also sure they would try for the same deal with the later Bolton pick, not the first one.
But something like 27,F1+F2 to Rich for 11 as our next offer?
If so, I can see why we are trying to get involved in the Baker / WCE deal. Gets us into the conversation by trying to be helpful.
But for me our interest in that deal shouldn't be about upgrading to the WCE pick 3 from 7 or 8. It should be about trying to get the earlier pick that comes from the Bolton deal (ie 11) out of Richmond and over to us to add to 7/8.
Just where I would look at this stage
If North F1 is an option, we have no chance
You'd be silly to knock back an offer like that!
- Oct 10, 2012
- 7,052
- 13,369
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
IMO Port are getting stitched up. Very surprised about the medya running with a fairly low price for an AA, but god knows what for every Richmond player, Noble, etc
depends how much they rate Luka
Similar threads
