I really couldn't tell if there was deflection. Too many of the angles we got were slowed down so much the path of the ball, and any path change, were hard to make out.
Try opening your eyes next time you watch it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I really couldn't tell if there was deflection. Too many of the angles we got were slowed down so much the path of the ball, and any path change, were hard to make out.
Which night?Common sense prevailed that night also.
Yep the front on vision was all he needed. A side on view to confirm no visible gap and its good to go.While the 3rd umpire made the right call, his reasoning for part of it was also very suspect.
When he asked for a freeze frame and then said 'I can see clearly it is touching the glove', that's not something that should inform the call. Single frames can be misleading and there was nothing conclusive about that frame at all.
It was the obvious deflection using multiple frames that was conclusive.
So even Indian fans agree on JaiswalThat decision went over really well with the Indian fans here at the ground. Now we've got 'cheater' chants.
Bats made of ice knowing those flogsThere were a couple of series where it seemed batsmen, especially the poms, had found some trick to get around it. Smashed a couple that showed nothing.
Feel like a douche sitting at home in a suit.I appreciate Taufel coming on but he needs a better mic. Is he doing it from home and he just gets a call from the commentary team every controversial call?
Why can’t they use that ball tracking tech that Fox showed immediately after the decision? That made it clear as day for anyone blind enough to not see it liveThe clear deflection outweighs snicko per Simon Taufel.
Australia's been in front the whole match. It's like a side kicking five goals to nothing in the first quarter, and although the opposition sometimes gets within ten points, they've never actually hit the front.2006 Adelaide test is termed Amazing Adelaide (yes, someone stayed up all night coming up with that).
If Australia Cricket Team (R) wins, what will Melbourne be called?
Hot spot has not been used for a few seasons now. It’s too expensive for all the test countries to use so if all can’t use it, no one uses it.Why no hot spot?
It looked to me on the replay that it caught up with his index finger when he was through the shot.Cricindia saying it was to far away from the mic
Pretty clearly that if there was nothing on snicko doesn't think he can be given out.
So waiting for a confirmation is called cheating these days is it? Numpty.What ****ing scum. Knew he was out a tried to cheat his way to staying in.
So Australia want to use it (not a part of DRS but complementary to it) so everyone else has to?Those countries allow us to use it with no issue
So, yeah, blame India
Like the 89 GF seen as the greatest everAustralia's been in front the whole match. It's like a side kicking five goals to nothing in the first quarter, and although the opposition sometimes gets within ten points, they've never actually hit the front.
Ricky Ponting on 7 claiming you know he hit it because he stepped towards the dressing room.Not his job to walk. Umpires job to give players out.
Brayshaw giving it to Wilson.
On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app
He was questioning should he stay because Snicko showed nothing.So what did he say to them exactly? You just assume he was "arguing".
Source?Grouse game.
Yeah I thought it was reliable too but I guess I’m wrong. Surely both in tandem could be good source for calls like that. I thought third ump was kinda bold and some might might not be as bold with that visual judgement especially if the deflection isn’t as strongHaven't used it all series. Too expensive and unreliable apparently. Interesting because I always found it to be a better tool than snicko