Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably looking a a repeat of this effort to mark its approximate 10-year anniversary.
Yeah, but they're making a statement against a midfield stocked almost exclusively with players who didn't play in that grand final.
So, um, congratulations?
Edit: to add to this, the only player we had attend a centre bounce last week that also attended a centre bounce in the 22 GF was Tom Atkins.
Yeah but ours are either forwards who will starve or defenders who will get crucified. The weapons we need we don't have, and the weapons we have we can't use.Both sides still have about 75% of the players who were there that day so I would hope at least from our side there would still be a bit of feeling there. Obviously winning a home and away game doesn't square the ledger or even come close, but it would be good to see that it still burns a bit given what's at stake for our group this year.
Yeah but ours are either forwards who will starve or defenders who will get crucified. The weapons we need we don't have, and the weapons we have we can't use.
We'll need trump to win the election for that I think.Hopefully Biden does not give you guys permission to use those weapons inside Sydney territory.
Yeah but ours are either forwards who will starve or defenders who will get crucified. The weapons we need we don't have, and the weapons we have we can't use.
Sydney are good enough to do to us what Richmond, GWS, Port managed for 2 quarters, but for a whole game. And it's at the SCG. That would mean near enough a 100 point loss.That's pretty pessimistic
Not necessarily.That's pretty pessimistic
Call it what you want, it’s still a week off.I'm no expert but pretty sure that's not what a bye is hey
I like the over all direction of the club, we're doing well with what we have. But when you are missing the entire starting midfield and playing 22 year olds there then you're going to see things come apart on other areas.That's pretty pessimistic
Who do you think you guys will be missing this week from the mids aside from Danger & Guthrie?I like the over all direction of the club, we're doing well with what we have. But when you are missing the entire starting midfield and playing 22 year olds there then you're going to see things come apart on other areas.
Bad backlines can be protected with good defensive work midfield and forward. Bad forwards can be made to look better with defenders who rebound quick and mids who win the contest convincingly.
There's no hiding a bad midfield though. Without one that's at least competitive you're cooked.
I'm just enjoying seeing the kids have a crack tbh.
Actually blitz will be back so that's something. Stanley is cooked and it's too early to rely on Conway so I would say we don't really have a starting ruck to be missing anymore.Who do you think you guys will be missing this week from the mids aside from Danger & Guthrie?
Who do you think you guys will be missing this week from the mids aside from Danger & Guthrie?
No pressure but it would be hard to script a better opportunity for you too put a % booster on usCats fans giving us the kiss of death in this thread.
You do know that the SCG at 16,556m2 is larger than Kardinia Park 15,355m2 don't you? It's strange that other tiny ovals like Docklands (16,211m2) and Adelaide Oval (16,133m2) are never referred to as "smaller grounds".Not necessarily.
Our midfield right now is similar to where you guys where at a few years back with a developing Rowbottom, Warner, & eventually Gulden...but we don't even have our JPK & Parker at the time (Dangerfield & Guthrie) playing.
The pieces are there for us with Conway, Holmes, Bruhn, & Clark, and they'll look good in patches...but as a contingent they're not up to matching the stars of the competition as of yet.
Sydney's midfield would be the best going around at the moment, and on smaller grounds like the SCG in particular, that's generally where the game is won and lost.
We bring it in ourselves by persisting with that terrible low camera angle at the SCG. It makes it look like a suburban ground with no space.You do know that the SCG at 16,556m2 is larger than Kardinia Park 15,355m2 don't you? It's strange that other tiny ovals like Docklands (16,211m2) and Adelaide Oval (16,133m2) are never referred to as "smaller grounds".
I think it's the relative dimensions rather than the square meterage there.You do know that the SCG at 16,556m2 is larger than Kardinia Park 15,355m2 don't you? It's strange that other tiny ovals like Docklands (16,211m2) and Adelaide Oval (16,133m2) are never referred to as "smaller grounds".
Its a coping mechanismCats fans giving us the kiss of death in this thread.
You do know that the SCG at 16,556m2 is larger than Kardinia Park 15,355m2 don't you? It's strange that other tiny ovals like Docklands (16,211m2) and Adelaide Oval (16,133m2) are never referred to as "smaller grounds".