Sam Elliot is medium fast but he's the leading wicket taker in both Shield and One Dayerssiddle lol...its embarassing that he is still playing shield level..dont Victoria have any young fast bowlers ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sam Elliot is medium fast but he's the leading wicket taker in both Shield and One Dayerssiddle lol...its embarassing that he is still playing shield level..dont Victoria have any young fast bowlers ?
I mean, Indias bats also struggled on day 1I'll take occupying the crease and not having bowlers to be back bowling in 50 overs because they can't be bothered getting through a tough period
O’Neill going well tooSam Elliot is medium fast but he's the leading wicket taker in both Shield and One Dayers
I mean, Indias bats also struggled on day 1
I feel like you are oversimplifying the situation a bit.Sure, but half of our dismissals were from balls flat out could have left. It's poor batting technique. Yes they bowled well but worldwide it's abysmal batting everywhere. Batsmen have to get it through their rather thick head, a leave is the best shot in cricket if it's not on the stumps leave it when you only have to get through the night before it gets easier. Instead we have every bloke wanting to play at every ball. How many of those wickets were actually from unplayable balls, Head yes, who else?
Sam Elliot is medium fast but he's the leading wicket taker in both Shield and One Dayers
I suppose, if he’s good enough, would it not be good for our up and coming bats to be facing a quality fast bowler like Siddle?I probably worded it poorly.. I Have nothing against Siddle, but I'm not sure its great for Australian cricket to have a 40 year old open the bowling for one of our 6 state sides
i'm inclined to agree with you as it's depriving a youngster coming through the ranks. However I assume once our captain Will Sutherland returns from injury Siddle will be the one who makes wayI probably worded it poorly.. I Have nothing against Siddle, but I'm not sure its great for Australian cricket to have a 40 year old open the bowling for one of our 6 state sides
I suppose, if he’s good enough, would it not be good for our up and coming bats to be facing a quality fast bowler like Siddle?
I’d say it should be a mix, with the best available having a fair say in it.maybe but really not the point..id rather see his spot taken by someone who may have a test future..The youth focus in Aust cricket should be at shield level
Sure, but half of our dismissals were from balls flat out could have left. It's poor batting technique. Yes they bowled well but worldwide it's abysmal batting everywhere. Batsmen have to get it through their rather thick head, a leave is the best shot in cricket if it's not on the stumps leave it when you only have to get through the night before it gets easier. Instead we have every bloke wanting to play at every ball. How many of those wickets were actually from unplayable balls, Head yes, who else?
I agree mostly Phat, but having someone with Siddles experience playing when Boland is unavailable is fine with me, if it means he can mentor some younger bowlers, which is what Victoria have done for the most part.You can’t tell a guy who loves cricket and still has the capability to play at a decent level ‘you can’t play.’
However, there are countless franchise leagues across the globe that cater to that.
There is a first class competition that pays good money in England featuring nearly 20 teams that does that.
Hell, some of the Asian domestic competitions would probably pay to have someone of his experience play a stint with some of their young players for a while.
In a 6 team domestic first class comp of 10 games each, it seems like an incredible waste of a spot for a guy who is not even going to be a chance of pinch hitting for a series and borderline selfish as much as I know he just loves playing the game.
Like for a 35-36 year old I see the value in that, the mentor side plus if they’re actually having a genuine career renaissance there is always the chance they could fill a gap in a test side for 18 months.
siddle is in neither category...and imo there is a big difference between having over 35's in your test team and having mass over 35's in your shield teamsWould Australia’s best u25 XI beat the o30 XI?
I would suggest not.
Dropping good performers over 30 (or wherever you want to draw the line) for younger players only lowers the quality.
I truly can't believe we are actually going to consider going in to Adelaide with Marnus being our legit 4th seam option if it is true Marsh can't bowl...
We’ll know more in a few hours, they’re in the nets tonighthave they learned nothing from the 1st test
Hang on what?I truly can't believe we are actually going to consider going in to Adelaide with Marnus being our legit 4th seam option if it is true Marsh can't bowl...
McSweeney?What happened by the way to Steve's Smith's selfless decision to open?
Drop labs play webster ?I truly can't believe we are actually going to consider going in to Adelaide with Marnus being our legit 4th seam option if it is true Marsh can't bowl...
Don’t hate that ideaDrop labs play webster ?