- May 20, 2013
- 5,476
- 9,274
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Bartel saying it will be the best win in Ken's coaching tenure, did he forget Round 1, 2019 vs Melbourne?!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I'm reading this with the tune to the Stonecutters' song going through my head.Who handed out a world record thumping against the current premiership favourite ? Port Did.
Who beat an everything on the line Freo when it was a dead rubber ? Port Did.
Who was on an awesome pre finals run ? Port was.
With Butters now cleared and a fast, clearance dominating midfield, you will be hard to beat.
Who will have a massive home crowd behind them ? You guys.
Well the SCG suits our high press game which isn't an high press game at the SCG .No way ! Ultimate bogey side - much prefer the Hawks.
That may be happening, maybe he's actually not playing but we're saying he is.Butters cleared by the club to play on Friday.
Also, is there a reason why we couldn't keep him 'in doubt' to try and sike Hawthorn?
I'm reading this with the tune to the Stonecutters' song going through my head.
Imagine being named Willem.
I’d roll the dice on Marshall over Dixon.
Nah, it was right to play Dixon last week. We thought that after having a week off to freshen up, he might resemble a human being out there like he did last time after a break, instead of a lumbering concrete pillar.
But ya can't put up with 3 touches and zero score for two games in a row.
Not really sure why the consensus on here is that Charlie needs to be dropped
Then ... we don't have much to talk about, lol.
3 touches in a final is pretty bad. But he's competing with a guy in Ratugolea who had 6 touches and hasn't rucked for us at all.
I don't think we're dropping both of them. Who is more likely to make an impact?
Jack Ginnivan is a selfish, arrogant little brat, full of himself, he went to the races pre our GF, never asked the Coach, got on the sauce, late night, and played a shocking game in the GF, then rubbed our Coaches face in it, by wearing jockey silks to the flag celebrations. What he did to McStay as a sick prank was unforgiveable, our players wanted the little turd gone. and he went, good riddance,hes a walking time bomb, as Mitchell will soon find out.This makes a very good point.
This should definitely be used as very strong leverage and ammunition by a very proud and traditional club to bolster the playing group into a savage response. It equates to little more than complete disrespect and contempt for said proud, traditional and successful club of 155 years by an upstart, Johnny Come Lately mob who have been around just on a century and have been by and large gifted successful dynasties by way of being handed a very fertile recruiting zone ( 70s) and consistently questionable umpiring ( 80s & 90s) that turned them into a club of significance after 40 years of arse whippings. Their recent successes can't be derided, they have earned them through hard work and graft with a bit of luck on the way ( 2014 PF as an example) but that by no means gives them any right to carry on with this crap.
If the brains trust can't latch onto this and use this as a spur, then they all deserve to be cleaned out, lock stock and barrel. It should be motivation enough for the players anyway if they have any pride - in the guernsey and personal - to want to add a little more of Hawthorn's dominant and most recognisable colour to their faces.
I'm reminded of a mid season game in Adelaide in 2004 against the Toilet Ducks, whose cheer squad held up the run through with the message ' Remember last September - We're Baaaaaack!! ' in huge letters. The players, to a man, saw that and ripped them apart by about 15 goals. Not one player that day backed out of a contest or played ' nice ' . This deserves the same response.
Rat wasn't great either, clearly (not Robinson Crusoe there). But he was more effective up forward than Dixon. I bet you could throw him into the ruck too. Could hardly lose clearance any worse than we did anyway.
You see Rat as competition to Marshall, which blinds you to anything Rat does. It's hard to have constructive debate with someone as utterly blindly devoted to Marshall as you are. Have you asked yourself in a serious way, why you are? I'm truly interested, no sarcasm at all.
Someone's gotta stand under the incessant long-bombs into the 50, under Hinkleyball.What exactly is Rat doing? It's not kicking goals. It's not setting them up. He's not a particularly active forward in terms of movement or generating space. He's just standing still under hospital balls and not marking them.
He's a better Dixon, currently. Saying that, neither played well, clearly.I see him as a poorer Dixon
Is that an answer to my genuine question about why you're so blindly devoted to him? (for a moment I was gonna ask if you think "blindly devoted" is a fair characterization, but of course you don't think so).Marshall just gets an inordinate amount of hate on this board
Someone's gotta stand under the incessant long-bombs into the 50, under Hinkleyball.
He's a better Dixon, currently. Saying that, neither played well, clearly.
Is that an answer to my genuine question about why you're so blindly devoted to him? (for a moment I was gonna ask if you think "blindly devoted" is a fair characterization, but of course you don't think so).
But really, is the above line the only reason for your devotion?
I put the same question (in reverse) to myself, in anticipation. It took me a looong time to go from liking Marshall as a player, to never wanting to see him play for us again. It's not as if I suddenly took a stance against the guy and that was that.
I think it's more than that, but I'm not gonna ask again.it's a response to his unfair treatment on this board
Even in this season (where you've decided that Marshall has been so bad that he should never play for us again), you're advocating for Ratugolea who in his 6 games as a KPF in 2024 is behind Marshall in every important KPF metric. Marks, Goals, accuracy, Marks inside 50, Score involvements, goal assists. Apparently wanting a forward who is more productive in every metric is "blind devotion".