Why did it have to be in Geelong?
If you can ... bah bah ... make it there, you'll make it ... bah bah ... anywhere, it's up to you ... Geelong sheethole, geeeeeeelong sheethooooooole.
Sent using Tapatalk App on Android.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Why did it have to be in Geelong?
Would not be averse to this.Bryce Gibbs to do the job he did on Oliver?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Any reason you didn't mention Douglas?Would not be averse to this.
However, Lynch in JJ out is a no-brainer, but who goes out for Gibbs? Galootch/Murphy/? The moustache was prominent in some quality forward 50 delivery against Richmond, something we've sorely lacked. Don't want to sacrifice that. I know Murphy has his knockers but he's difficult to match up on and is tenacious at the ball and the oppo and snags a goal or two...or three. Greenwood?-he keeps taking timely big grabs for timely important goals. I'm thinking Gibbs doesn't get a guernsey.
Yes. Mainly the pecking order, but I think he'll be given more chances to get his best game going, which is, regardless of the BF hate, a very good asset for us. He should be in the discussion for being dropped, but he won't be in that discussion at the selection table.Any reason you didn't mention Douglas?
I don't know about 'getting pumped', but for sure Geelong will be breathing fire and won't put in another performance that bad for the rest of the season.Lol we are gonna get pumped. There is no way in hell Geelong dish up last nights trash again.
One option I would like to see is for Gibbs in for Douglas and play forward more. He's a great mark and kick.
The JJ replacement is a real challenge. Berg doesn't impact enough as yet, Sauce is just a mark and kick, then there is FOG who isn't ding enough and Davis who is nearly there
For me it would be Douglas.Would not be averse to this.
However, Lynch in JJ out is a no-brainer, but who goes out for Gibbs? Galootch/Murphy/? The moustache was prominent in some quality forward 50 delivery against Richmond, something we've sorely lacked. Don't want to sacrifice that. I know Murphy has his knockers but he's difficult to match up on and is tenacious at the ball and the oppo and snags a goal or two...or three. Greenwood?-he keeps taking timely big grabs for timely important goals. I'm thinking Gibbs doesn't get a guernsey.
Himmelberg is coming in for Jenkins. It doesn’t matter if you don’t agree, it’s happening and it’s unbelievably obvious.
All this talk about Jacobs being a possibility to play alongside ROB (he’s not, and the coach has publicly stated this), or Fogarty to come in (this is laughable), or that maybe Lynch will just replace Jenkins and then we’d use Lynch or Hartigan as the backup ruck (again, laughable) is not reality. Match committee aren’t even considering any of those options so give it a rest.
Himmelberg and Lynch are in (pending a Lynch fitness test). Jenkins and someone else are out. The “someone else” is probably Douglas (has been poor) or Greenwood (only stayed in due to Lynch’s calf), unless we cop an injury or illness. I’d be dropping Dougie in a heartbeat.
If a 3rd change occurs, it’ll almost definitely be one of Gibbs, Mackay or Jones coming in. The likes of Stengle, Davis, Fogarty, Jacobs, McHenry, Wilson, Poholke, Knight and Butts aren’t in the frame at all unless there is carnage at training or a viral outbreak.
If Talia doesn’t get up, Otten will come in.
If Murphy is dropped as the 3rd change to the side, Jones will come in.
If Kelly doesn’t get up, Gibbs or Mackay will come in.
If a mid goes down at training, Gibbs or Jones will come in.
On a side note, last night proved how vital it is to put a hard tag on Tim Kelly. De Boer and Houston have done absolute numbers on him and won the respective games for their sides. It clearly works if done correctly.
The question is, do we even have a player capable of doing this job on our list?
It might sound weird, but the two players I see as most suited to this job are actually both outside the current 22: Jones and Gibbs.
Greenwood and CEY are too slow, while M Crouch and B Crouch are too offensively minded.
Sloane is the other option, but he’ll be getting bashed up by the other Cats mids. I don’t love the idea of him as a tagger.
I liked the tagging job Jones did on Neale after half time in the Lions game. He is someone who can just dedicate his entire game to stopping his opponent at this stage of his career. Plus he certainly has the speed and endurance to do the job. I would go with him over Gibbs, because Gibbs to me still looks like a player who isn’t running out games too well and isn’t able to concentrate on a gig like this for 4 quarters.
A very unlucky Greenwood makes way, purely for team balance for this specific game. I’d much prefer to drop Murphy on overall output, but we need forward 50 speed and pressure too much so it upsets the balance. I’d also love to ditch Atkins, but he was genuinely really good against Richmond so it seems wrong to do so. If we are to kick a winning score, we’ll need overlap run.
Greenwood travels and stays in if Lynch doesn’t get up and plays forward.
Gibbs gets one more in the SANFL, and if he dominates again, he’s back in for the Showdown.
My changes...
In: Himmelberg, Lynch, Jones
Out: Jenkins (inj), Douglas, Greenwood
Emg: Jacobs, Greenwood, Gibbs, Otten
Douglas out is a no-brainer. Worst performed and easiest to replace. Gibbs would give us so much more in an attacking, distributing or defensive role depending on the needs on the dayYes. Mainly the pecking order, but I think he'll be given more chances to get his best game going, which is, regardless of the BF hate, a very good asset for us. He should be in the discussion for being dropped, but he won't be in that discussion at the selection table.
It’s it
Sorry. I thought this was the Faith No More sing a long thread
You might be right, but I doubt he'll be dropped is all.Douglas out is a no-brainer. Worst performed and easiest to replace. Gibbs would give us so much more in an attacking, distributing or defensive role depending on the needs on the day
you never know. I'm still in shock that Mackay, Sauce and Otten haven't played every game this year.You might be right, but I doubt he'll be dropped is all.
I note you are dropping pretty much three forwards
who would be the best performing forward in the B's
This!Pressure, pressure, pressure.
Yeah, as in *sings*Ding enough?
Seriously doubt it.If Murphy is dropped as the 3rd change to the side, Jones will come in.
It doesn’t matter if you don’t agree, it’s [not] happening and it’s unbelievably obvious.
This is where im confused clearly said lynch for greenwood and if lynch doesnt get up greenwood stats inTwo forwards and a mid go out. Greenwood played predominantly in the midfield against Richmond but can float forward.
Two forwards and a mid come in. Jones would play predominantly as a mid against Geelong if selected for the tagging role I have proposed, but can float forward.
Himmelberg is the only Jenkins replacement. He came in earlier in the season in more questionable form than he’s in now.
Lynch is a no-brainer. Best 18. Half forward.
There are no other forwards in the SANFL who are going to get AFL games any time soon. Stengle is simply Eddie’s backup, but he’s not likely to dislodge Murphy because Tyson doesn’t have that defensive capability that is required in our current setup. Fogarty is horribly out of form. Davis would only get in if neither of Lynch or Greenwood were available.
Geelong Forecast
Provides access to Australian weather forecasts, weather observations, flood warnings and high sea forecasts from each state and territory provided by the Bureau of Meteorologywww.bom.gov.au
Going to be a fast track.
Worst scenario for us unfortunately