jackster83
Killing with a smile
With zero tackles inside 50, you just know at least one, if not both of McHenry and Murphy will be back.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
With zero tackles inside 50, you just know at least one, if not both of McHenry and Murphy will be back.
If we make no changes we should.If Murphy plays we should fold the club
Long time??? I've seen enough in Soligo, Rachele, Berry, Shoenberg and Pedlar to suggest otherwise we won't be in a few years and Rankine can be anything if he does become a midfielder.We have to be honest, no amount of changes to that squad would stop today. Our midfield is the worst in the comp and will be for a long time. We are not setup to beat teams like GWS in the middle and we haven't drafted to do this. It doesn't matter if we have the best forwards in the comp if we can't win a centre clearance.
No, not McHenryOut: Hinge, ROB, Brown
In: Thilthorpe, Parnell, Sholl
Edit: also McAdam out for McHenry
Murphy for McAdam… why?Realistically, only 1 change likely:
OUT: McAdam (susp)
IN: Murphy
Murphy is clearly next in line, if there's a vacancy among our small forwards. The big question is how many weeks McAdam will get - it won't be a short vacation.
McAdam suspended, probably for 3+ weeks.Murphy for McAdam… why?
McAdam isn’t a small forward. That’s not his role.McAdam suspended, probably for 3+ weeks.
Murphy is clearly next cab off the rank, when it comes to small forwards - ahead of McHenry, and Gollant (more a mid-sized forward). Don't forget that Murphy was named on the extended interchange bench on Thursday night. It's obviously not going to be popular with BF, who have a sheeple "we hate Murphy" thing going, but it's fairly obvious that's the way the selectors are thinking.
Small-medium forward. Either way, Murphy is well ahead of Gollant in the selectors' eyes.McAdam isn’t a small forward. That’s not his role.
McAdam is not a small forward, it doesn’t make sense for Murphy to come in as his replacementMcAdam suspended, probably for 3+ weeks.
Murphy is clearly next cab off the rank, when it comes to small forwards - ahead of McHenry, and Gollant (more a mid-sized forward). Don't forget that Murphy was named on the extended interchange bench on Thursday night. It's obviously not going to be popular with BF, who have a sheeple "we hate Murphy" thing going, but it's fairly obvious that's the way the selectors are thinking.
Hope you are right but i will bet you aren't..they will throw the book at him to make an example..look at tge media covering of it in gamePickett gets 2 weeks so no way Shano gets more than that if the MR are fair dinkum...
Did you actually watch the Pickett hit?Hope you are right but i will bet you aren't..they will throw the book at him to make an example..look at tge media covering of it in game
I did but i am factoring in him playing for a big vic club and mcadam playing for us...the 'cotchin effect' lets sayDid you actually watch the Pickett hit?
Franklin offered 1 week I think. His bump similar to McAdams so should be no more than that. Picketts bump was far worse.Pickett gets 2 weeks so no way Shano gets more than that if the MR are fair dinkum...
Murray had a corked thigh. Reckon he'd be alright to play.Few unknowns.
How is Murray? If injured & gather Worrell not ready, Keane could be getting an early debut for the Crows.
Will McAdam get rubbed out with no concussion caused? Very lucky he didn't cause more damage. Gollant would be the obvious replacement.
With the game played in heat & 6 day break, we should be looking at making more than the usual changes.
Don't have all the answers, but we should be considering many of our players on the fringe given they are fresh from no sanfl.
Schoenberg for Taylor.
Thilthorpe for Himmelberg or ROB.
Smith/Hamill for Parnell
Jones for Hinge
We also need to pick more of an impact sub.