raman
Kind of a Jagger-Tarzan
Why is Wines being selected ahead of Rockliff
lolwut
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why is Wines being selected ahead of Rockliff
Lycett might be missing again next game.I’m giving the Lad another game ,wether it means bringing Lycett back as well . Ebert for Motlop, Watts for Burton , if Rozee needs a rest Bergman
lolwut
Why is Wines being selected ahead of Rockliff
We’ve picked one and we need to stick with it but it’s not an outrageous topic of conversation. It up to Ollie to start dominating some games and prove he is clearly better than Rockliff.lolwut
Well probably find out as soon as this weekend what happens when you let the likes of Ryder get a free run at itI too doubt that Lycett will be fit to play this week, but I'm a bit surprised that some appear to be writing him off, as his bash and crash style will be very much needed against the likes of Grundy and Nicnat etc, when the whips are cracking come finals time.
His absolute domination and intimidation of Max Gawn only last season appears to have been forgotten as well.
i was pro rockliff after round 2, but after seeing them both in the side again, despite his flaws wines is far more valuable to us.Wines sucked for three quarters last week but he was huge in the last. We don't complete that turnaround without him.
Re Wines v Rockliff, we're pretty much locked into Wines, because if we drop him to the SANFL again he definitely leaves at the end of the year and we'll be lucky to get a half eaten sandwich for him at the trade table. Sucks for Rockliff but it's the best thing for the club as a whole right now.
Add to that the strong pack mark Ollie took basically uncontested, if he could take 4-6 more intercept marks around the ground each week, or get back to the goal a game mid he was this wouldn’t be a Wines vs Rockliff discussion, this would be a Houston vs Rockliff chat. Ollie needs that additional string to his bow, he is a coal face brute. Adding in as an intercept threat or Goal Kicking mid would force teams to pay more attention around the ground and everything would improve ten fold.It’s worth noting that last week cogs and hopper had probably their worst game for the year and then this week Cripps had his worst game for the year
I don’t think that is chance
wines / Houston combo has been very good at stopping opposition from winning the ball in the coal face.
I think sometimes we underrate inside mids because they aren’t hitting up targets all the time and take it for granted that the opposition aren’t dominant around contests and that our outside game is firing as if they aren’t linked.
It worries me that we are still to short in the back line. Why can't Ladhams play off half back, offering us that extra tall in defence, with Lycett rucking? I view Ladhams as a real plus for the group, surely he stays in.
Motlop is crucial as a connector between the midfield and forward line. He receives handballs and finds open men on the break forward of the halfway line. Without him, we rely on our less composed midfielders to hoof the ball 50 metres up field with no plan of attack. He may not get a lot of the ball but he uses it wisely.out: Burton (inj), Westhoff (omit), Motlop (omit)
in: Bergman, Georgiades, Ebert
F. Butters Dixon Gray
HF Rozzee Marshall Georgiades
C Duursma Boak Amon
HB Mayes McKenzie Hartlett
FB Jonas Clurey Byrne-Jones
1R Ladhams, Wines, Houston
int. Powell-Pepper, Bergman, Farell, Ebert
Well probably find out as soon as this weekend what happens when you let the likes of Ryder get a free run at it
On SM-G960F using
BigFooty.com mobile app