But why male models.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
But why male models.
How much you putting on Sydney?
Not confidant side 2005 and still going strong.
If Hurn is injured Rotham.
Waterman in that 3rd qtr came into Darlings fwd role and thats where he belongs but thats not going to happen. He was very good in that role. But WCE dont play him there long enough and gets up the ground and his disposal around the ground is very questionable..
Playing Swans at SCG i question the height we have. I think Waterman will be unlucky. Its hard now with Nic Nat coming back shortly to find the best Ruck and Key Fwd set up. My thoughts the whole time that Jake Waterman is just not going to get a good go at it.
Nic Nat is 29 has a few years left and will be in a tandem ruck combo, JK is signed on for 2020. JD has yrs left. Oscar Allen has gone ahead of Waterman and i believe Brander will also soon enough.
Nic only ever played 60-70% game time at his peak, so we wouldn't just need a pinchhitter - especially after two knee recos. We'd need a fully competent ruckman to cover him.
There's a reason why Lycett was chosen over Vardy when we had all our ruckman available in 2018.
No you don't understand. Rotham is two inches taller than Cole which makes them "totally different"' so if we made that switch, that would subvert "the formula" and open a vortex and our whole back six would get sucked into the space between dimensions. We can't risk it.This would be a very good opportunity to play Rotham, regardless of whether Hurn plays.
I think he has more obvious matchups than Cole, given that Sydney have Blakey, McCartin and Florent, all of whom are between 189-194cm.
I wouldn't trust Cole on Papley - too good in the air and too crafty around stoppages. Shep ought to go to him.
Are you telling me that a team that won a premiership playing three tall defenders can afford to replace a 185cm defender with a more athletic 192cm defender? Don't be ridiculous.No you don't understand. Rotham is two inches taller than Cole which makes them "totally different"' so if we made that switch, that would subvert "the formula" and open a vortex and our whole back six would get sucked into the space between dimensions. We can't risk it.
One is "small". One is "not small". They're therefore completely different players, despite playing roughly similar positions. These are the rules of the universe.Are you telling me that a team that won a premiership playing three tall defenders can afford to replace a 185cm defender with a more athletic 192cm defender? Don't be ridiculous.
Because of the ground dimensions of the SCG don't they say you don't really need a CHF which means if I'm not misreading things that we shouldn't go in too tall?The SCG has traditionally given us fits. We're going for our first victory there since 1999. 0-7 since then.
Unfortunately 2 into 1 doesn't go - when all fit JK is FF and Darling CHF which leaves only 3rd forward option left for Waterman. Once JK retires then would think Darling will be FF and Waterman can then play in his preferred position. Similar scenario re Sheed being played in his non preferred until Gaff got suspended following his brain fade.Well that's a turn around from Waterman not being AFL quality!
So now he is good enough when played in the correct position.
Well that's a turn around from Waterman not being AFL quality!
So now he is good enough when played in the correct position.
After all these years Sydney still dont have an AFL quality ground to play on. What a joke that teams have to consider going onto games without key position players to prepare for that postage sized slogfest. And it looks like it will be snowing there this week so that will make for even more of a spectacle.Because of the ground dimensions of the SCG don't they say you don't really need a CHF which means if I'm not misreading things that we shouldn't go in too tall?
Kennedy is pretty powerful. The better model for Waterman might be someone like Jack Gunston.Jake won't ever be a power forward, won't get Darlings upper body size in spite him being more or less the same height. As a forward Jake is much more like LeCras or Kennedy, lacks speed for separation but works his opponent over with lead after lead and timely body work.
The SCG has traditionally given us fits. We're going for our first victory there since 1999. 0-7 since then.
Only way Waterman doesn't play this week is if Venables comes in for him
His imaginary friend is having a field day lol
The better model for Waterman is believe is the Crows Tom LynchKennedy is pretty powerful. The better model for Waterman might be someone like Jack Gunston.