List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Remove this Banner Ad

  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links:
Player contract status
Draft prospect video highlights (thanks to noobermensch)
AFL retirements and delistings



Latest news and rumours:


  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

  • List Manager Matt Clarke appeared on Gettable - Click spoiler below for summary
    On the draft: "We predicted that the draft was strong, but it's probably gotten stronger during the year."

    On top end of draft: "You could probably make five or six different choices and get it right."

    On Pick 3: "I reckon there's five (players) around that mark."

    On splitting: "I think you want to hold an early selection if you can. The depth of this group allows you to maybe have some movement there, and see what you can do to bring in more talent in the first 20-25 picks. Easier said than done, and I think most clubs would be saying the same thing. We'll see what we can do."

    On Liam Baker: "He's still yet to make a decision. They're still weighing up a few things. We'd love to get Liam on board from what he offers from a talent and leadership point of view. We understand where we're at as a group, we're rebuilding our group, we need to add some guys in the middle tier to support our young group."

    On Jack Graham: "We've got a number of players that we're speaking to. A bit of a wait and see on that one as well. We'll talk to a number of guys."

    On Shai Bolton: "I think it will be difficult for anybody, really. He's heavily contracted and a high quality player."

    On James Peatling: "He's heavily involved in a finals series at the moment so I don't want to comment too much on it, but I think there's a number of guys that have been playing really good footy this year that could suit what we do and what other clubs do. He's taken his footy to another level this year."

    On Tom Barrass: "We've had an early discussion with Hawthorn about it, they understand where we're at. He's nominated Hawthorn as his ideal destination. We want what we think he's worth, as a genuine key back in the competition that can do what he can do. We're obviously mindful of getting an appropriate deal for West Coast."

    On Tom Clurey: "Maybe (note: sounded very non enthused). We'd probably need some key back depth, whether that's through the draft or trade and free agency."

    On Jack Darling: "We've had initial discussions with his management group about (moving). We're open to talking, as we are with all of our players, but Jack's contracted with us."

    On Liam Ryan: "I expect him to be at West Coast next year, yes." (The most definitive answer of the day by a mile, a non-starter of a talking point.)

    On out of contact players e.g. Rotham, Witherden, Jones: "We're still working through what it looks like from a list point of view, and how many selections we'll want to have, and players that may come in and potentially may go out. You might want to give a coach an opportunity to look at these guys."

    On Harley Reid: "We've had discussions most of the year with his management group. I think it sits in a really good place. We're open to doing really whatever they want to do to be honest. We're really confident in building the right system around Harley, on and off field, to make sure that he's really comfortable, that he's going to play his best footy, and his long term future."

    On Jake Waterman's new deal: "Yep, really close. We're working really closely with his management on that. I expect that we'll have something done pretty soon."

    On Oscar Allen: "We've been talking with Oscar and his manager most of the year on that one. We're going through some stuff at the moment. I think we'll be ok with that one."






 
Last edited by a moderator:

Log in to remove this ad.

Trade Radio
Dogs will want more then pick 20* from the Cats but they won’t want to give up more and you just need to get a deal done because the PSD won’t happen because no one wins.

None of this narrative for Baker for 23 who is lesser player than Smith.
Where do I find trade radio?
 
Trade Radio
Dogs will want more then pick 20* from the Cats but they won’t want to give up more and you just need to get a deal done because the PSD won’t happen because no one wins.

None of this narrative for Baker for 23 who is lesser player than Smith.
pick 20 for Smith puts Baker at our F4
 
Where do I find trade radio?
AFL website atm. Was just a 20 minute preview. Stuff we pretty much know already.

Not much Brissy stuff. Where they predict Ashcroft and Marshall to go (Pick 20). Didn’t mention the Lions but everyone is trying to use their Future 1st to buy into this years draft so good market to be a seller.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Barrass Out - with a 6 month supply of tissue's and anusol, plus a helmet for Karl Amon.

In - Hawks 1st this year and a 2nd rounder.
 
No doubt we'd be more competitive taking on a bunch of delisted spuds, it's dire. But we're looking to build the next premiership list, we can't take every spud that'd make our list of spuds slightly less spudier right?

Here's my wishlist preference; all of these players would offer something more in the midfield than what we're delisting, but we'll be damned if we take more than one:

Clear AFL level improvement:
  • Peatling
  • Baker (obvs without overpaying)
Borderline 22 / WAFL-level support:
  • Graham/Parfitt (as free agent)
  • Garcia
  • Dev
  • Kennedy
  • Seb Ross
If you don’t rate Kennedy, that’s fine but we need to find a way of improving our floor without giving away any or as little capital as possible.

Peatling many doubt with come to us and Baker will cost us our R2 at a minimum which might not even be enough.
 
Our number one priority should be the draft, then Free agency and then trading in players in that order.

Baker should be set as a round two pick maximum and if it’s more then just walk away. He’s out of contract and wants to come to WA. If Freo swoop in then so be it.

We need to continue to go to the draft strongly in the next two years which will then set us up with a base that we can build from.

Building from the draft will take time but will be the best result in the long run. The worst thing we could do is start trading our picks out 3 years into the process.
 
This was a definite step up for Finn compared to his disappointing outing last week, much more influential and involved with the play, but unfortunately his Chargers went down to the Rebels, ending his season. The Chargers only have themselves to blame for this loss, squandering countless opportunities, both from relatively easy goal scoring opportunities and some awful final balls into F50 with Finn himself responsible for a couple. With the game on the line he took a brilliant mark deep in the forward pocket, but hit the wrong side of the footy on his attempted banana which proved to be the Chargers final chance to retake the lead.

 
Riley and Cal mentioning again today clubs rate picks between 5-10 pretty much equal to picks 1-4. It's a shame about Murphy Reid otherwise i honestly think we would slide back from 3 to 6 for Baker assuming that's what GCS pay for Rioli. There's still a chance it could happen if we're really keen on Lalor but it seems unlikely. To slide back from 3 to 6 one of FOS, Draper, Langford or Lalor would have to be available.

Is that good or not good?

If a team puts a player as their #1 ranking and hold pick 6 will they look to upgrade to land their preferred #1 ranked player or not?

It really depends how much they want their #1 ranked player compared to their 2nd choice.
 
Is that good or not good?

If a team puts a player as their #1 ranking and hold pick 6 will they look to upgrade to land their preferred #1 ranked player or not?

It really depends how much they want their #1 ranked player compared to their 2nd choice.

Team's will be reluctant to trade out of the 5-10 range. Richmond may be the exception if they land the GCS pick so they can get 2 of Jagga, FOS or Langford.
 
Team's will be reluctant to trade out of the 5-10 range. Richmond may be the exception if they land the GCS pick so they can get 2 of Jagga, FOS or Langford.

I can see the Tigers doing that. But with North.

It all depends on where a club ranks a player and how much of a need it is to land that player.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top