List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Remove this Banner Ad

  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links:
Draft prospect video highlights (thanks to noobermensch)
AFL retirements and delistings



Latest news and rumours:







  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

  • List Manager Matt Clarke appeared on Sept 11 Gettable - Click spoiler below for summary
    On the draft: "We predicted that the draft was strong, but it's probably gotten stronger during the year."

    On top end of draft: "You could probably make five or six different choices and get it right."

    On Pick 3: "I reckon there's five (players) around that mark."

    On splitting: "I think you want to hold an early selection if you can. The depth of this group allows you to maybe have some movement there, and see what you can do to bring in more talent in the first 20-25 picks. Easier said than done, and I think most clubs would be saying the same thing. We'll see what we can do."

    On Liam Baker: "He's still yet to make a decision. They're still weighing up a few things. We'd love to get Liam on board from what he offers from a talent and leadership point of view. We understand where we're at as a group, we're rebuilding our group, we need to add some guys in the middle tier to support our young group."

    On Jack Graham: "We've got a number of players that we're speaking to. A bit of a wait and see on that one as well. We'll talk to a number of guys."

    On Shai Bolton: "I think it will be difficult for anybody, really. He's heavily contracted and a high quality player."

    On James Peatling: "He's heavily involved in a finals series at the moment so I don't want to comment too much on it, but I think there's a number of guys that have been playing really good footy this year that could suit what we do and what other clubs do. He's taken his footy to another level this year."

    On Tom Barrass: "We've had an early discussion with Hawthorn about it, they understand where we're at. He's nominated Hawthorn as his ideal destination. We want what we think he's worth, as a genuine key back in the competition that can do what he can do. We're obviously mindful of getting an appropriate deal for West Coast."

    On Tom Clurey: "Maybe (note: sounded very non enthused). We'd probably need some key back depth, whether that's through the draft or trade and free agency."

    On Jack Darling: "We've had initial discussions with his management group about (moving). We're open to talking, as we are with all of our players, but Jack's contracted with us."

    On Liam Ryan: "I expect him to be at West Coast next year, yes." (The most definitive answer of the day by a mile, a non-starter of a talking point.)

    On out of contact players e.g. Rotham, Witherden, Jones: "We're still working through what it looks like from a list point of view, and how many selections we'll want to have, and players that may come in and potentially may go out. You might want to give a coach an opportunity to look at these guys."

    On Harley Reid: "We've had discussions most of the year with his management group. I think it sits in a really good place. We're open to doing really whatever they want to do to be honest. We're really confident in building the right system around Harley, on and off field, to make sure that he's really comfortable, that he's going to play his best footy, and his long term future."

    On Jake Waterman's new deal: "Yep, really close. We're working really closely with his management on that. I expect that we'll have something done pretty soon."

    On Oscar Allen: "We've been talking with Oscar and his manager most of the year on that one. We're going through some stuff at the moment. I think we'll be ok with that one."




Past rumoured targets:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Would be utter stupidity not to take the risk on Champion.

Then again, we are supposedly willing to give 13 for Baker, and saw Nic Martin and Humphries as spuds.

Our list management is the definition of fu*k around and find out, LOL.

Well lets hope our new recruiting team with Don overseeing things gets better results.

Trade period has never been this intriguing for the Eagles since the Judd trade IMO..
 
Get rid of compensation for FA. Player has served his time at the club which drafted him and he can now choose where he plays.

Crack down hard on draft tempering. No more "I don't want to leave Vic" shenanigans.

Allow clubs access to NGA talent outside of the draft pool. Something like 1 kid per year can be taken out of a clubs NGA and directly onto an AFL list.
Unsure how I’ve never seen this suggested before but it’s surely a home run idea. The rest of the league don’t really have access to these players anyway, all the current system does is wildly distort the value of picks on a team by team basis with the points and bidding, and it’s all a bit ridiculous. How many bids don’t get matched, they’re as good as on the list already, why not take it a step further and clean up the draft market in the process.

Still incentivises teams to go and develop regionally, and if you have two+ in a year and have to pick which one you get for free, so be it. Draft the other one or if they’re not there by your pick well you chose someone you already think is better.

Genuinely good idea.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Unsure how I’ve never seen this suggested before but it’s surely a home run idea. The rest of the league don’t really have access to these players anyway, all the current system does is wildly distort the value of picks on a team by team basis with the points and bidding, and it’s all a bit ridiculous. How many bids don’t get matched, they’re as good as on the list already, why not take it a step further and clean up the draft market in the process.

Still incentivises teams to go and develop regionally, and if you have two+ in a year and have to pick which one you get for free, so be it. Draft the other one or if they’re not there by your pick well you chose someone you already think is better.

Genuinely good idea.
What happens when a team has a top 5 pick and also a top 5 talent within their academy? They get the academy kid for free and also get a top 5 kid in the open draft? At least the current system makes them pay something for their gun academy kid (even if it's a handful of 5c coins)
 
What if we are just really keen on Graham and he wouldnt move across the country for anything less than 900k per year?

Who are the AFL to say that we dont think hes worth it?
If you look at Graham and perryman stats for this season there isn't much difference. Perryman is less than 1 year younger.
 
But if I have a superstar who is a FA then my club should be able to demand what he is worth. If that’s pick 1 then so be it.
Currently the AFL are saying that superstar is not worth much. They should have no say.
As a restricted free agent you have the right to match the offer and force a trade
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The Graham compo shenanigans will never happen.

But, **** me if they did... Instant eradication of compo.
Yep I would love to be the team that rorted it so bad it broke the system .

Especially being 2 of the bottom teams working it out to come out both very much on top .

The melts from the rest of the clubs would be amazing
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top