List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Remove this Banner Ad

  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Latest news and rumours

Done deals:



  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted


Ongoing discussions:



  • List Manager Matt Clarke appeared on Sept 11 Gettable - Click spoiler below for summary
    On the draft: "We predicted that the draft was strong, but it's probably gotten stronger during the year."

    On top end of draft: "You could probably make five or six different choices and get it right."

    On Pick 3: "I reckon there's five (players) around that mark."

    On splitting: "I think you want to hold an early selection if you can. The depth of this group allows you to maybe have some movement there, and see what you can do to bring in more talent in the first 20-25 picks. Easier said than done, and I think most clubs would be saying the same thing. We'll see what we can do."

    On Liam Baker: "He's still yet to make a decision. They're still weighing up a few things. We'd love to get Liam on board from what he offers from a talent and leadership point of view. We understand where we're at as a group, we're rebuilding our group, we need to add some guys in the middle tier to support our young group."

    On Jack Graham: "We've got a number of players that we're speaking to. A bit of a wait and see on that one as well. We'll talk to a number of guys."

    On Shai Bolton: "I think it will be difficult for anybody, really. He's heavily contracted and a high quality player."

    On James Peatling: "He's heavily involved in a finals series at the moment so I don't want to comment too much on it, but I think there's a number of guys that have been playing really good footy this year that could suit what we do and what other clubs do. He's taken his footy to another level this year."

    On Tom Barrass: "We've had an early discussion with Hawthorn about it, they understand where we're at. He's nominated Hawthorn as his ideal destination. We want what we think he's worth, as a genuine key back in the competition that can do what he can do. We're obviously mindful of getting an appropriate deal for West Coast."

    On Tom Clurey: "Maybe (note: sounded very non enthused). We'd probably need some key back depth, whether that's through the draft or trade and free agency."

    On Jack Darling: "We've had initial discussions with his management group about (moving). We're open to talking, as we are with all of our players, but Jack's contracted with us."

    On Liam Ryan: "I expect him to be at West Coast next year, yes." (The most definitive answer of the day by a mile, a non-starter of a talking point.)

    On out of contact players e.g. Rotham, Witherden, Jones: "We're still working through what it looks like from a list point of view, and how many selections we'll want to have, and players that may come in and potentially may go out. You might want to give a coach an opportunity to look at these guys."

    On Harley Reid: "We've had discussions most of the year with his management group. I think it sits in a really good place. We're open to doing really whatever they want to do to be honest. We're really confident in building the right system around Harley, on and off field, to make sure that he's really comfortable, that he's going to play his best footy, and his long term future."

    On Jake Waterman's new deal: "Yep, really close. We're working really closely with his management on that. I expect that we'll have something done pretty soon."

    On Oscar Allen: "We've been talking with Oscar and his manager most of the year on that one. We're going through some stuff at the moment. I think we'll be ok with that one."




Past rumoured targets:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So you’d be happy to lose Jake Waterman for under market value?
So you'd be happy for him to spud the next 2 years and be locked into keeping him?

Most players get to 30 and either have continuous injuries that sideline them for most of the year or have been overtaken by younger, better players. a 3 year contract with options would have been a better bet.
 
I doubt it's much but given how out of favour he was last year I'm surprised we didn't just pay him out and let him have a proper retirement
someone explained that it could be because sheed's foot injury bad enough wont stop him from playing footy, so he cannot medically retire so if we paid him out now that would come out of this years TPP.

somehow our TPP this year is close to the limit.

by keeping him on the list it allows him one last roll of the dice (FOR THE EAGLES), at worst he's a good contributor at WAFL level.
 
So you'd be happy for him to spud the next 2 years and be locked into keeping him?

Most players get to 30 and either have continuous injuries that sideline them for most of the year or have been overtaken by younger, better players. a 3 year contract with options would have been a better bet.
It’s not as if he’s on gigantic mega dollars - all reports indicate he’s on a good deal with big incentives.

So yes, I am.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

So you'd be happy for him to spud the next 2 years and be locked into keeping him?

Most players get to 30 and either have continuous injuries that sideline them for most of the year or have been overtaken by younger, better players. a 3 year contract with options would have been a better bet.
You didn't answer the question though.
 
Front loaded contract so no risks.

Yep people keep forget that we have to spend the TTP so it’s actually a smart piece of business front-loading a contract.
We have just dumped Darlings contract and if all is to be believed we will be doing same ( if not all but in part ) for Barrass.

You got to spend it so, front loaded contracts on players you want to keep are the tool by which to do so.
 


Both players taken from the same draft 14 picks apart, both played just shy of 300 games for their respective clubs, both incredibly durable, both (reportedly) on similar contracts p.a., both offered multi year deals to move interstate and Jack comfortably played more games this year and playing a far more crucial position.

We don’t have to be w*nkers but a little bit of backbone wouldn’t hurt.
 


6 AND 13

They want 6 and 13 for Daniel Rioli

Where am I?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Next Year he'd be a free agent. We'd be about Pick 2 or 3 so a Top 5 compensation pick. Yep, I'd be happy to wait out the year and see what happens.
Unpopular opinion but I agree I think we played this one poorly. He we waited until end of next year we either end up paying him a fair contract at market value or we likely get a top 5 pick for him.
 
Saints thinking its a salary dump .

Macrae is on 800k + for the next 3 years and not best 22 .

Bulldogs turned around and want a decent pick for him lol .

Saints waiting till the end of trade period to see if the dogs realise saints are doing them a favour by taking on his contract .

Dogs should be packing macrae bags
It seems like everyone knows next year's draft is a bust and Tassie is coming from 2026, so they're playing real hardball on trades to gain/preserve R1 and R2 selections. I think this trade period is likely to be pretty lacklustre.
 


6 AND 13

They want 6 and 13 for Daniel Rioli

Where am I?

To be fair to Richmond - they’re dealing with Gold Coast who are known for throwing away draft picks for less. May as well ask - GC might think 6 and 13 is a fine bit of trading and will pat themselves on the back before missing finals yet again.
 


Both players taken from the same draft 14 picks apart, both played just shy of 300 games for their respective clubs, both incredibly durable, both (reportedly) on similar contracts p.a., both offered multi year deals to move interstate and Jack comfortably played more games this year and playing a far more crucial position.

We don’t have to be w*nkers but a little bit of backbone wouldn’t hurt.

Difference is Parker just kicked three goals in a Grand Final and is actually part of Sydney’s plans. Jack is fourth in line, trending to be fifth, for his own position and has no prospect of a contract extension from us.

You don’t need to have a win for the sake of having a win when we’re talking 61 vs 67.
 


6 AND 13

They want 6 and 13 for Daniel Rioli

Where am I?

Problem is Gold Coast don’t play on the same field as the rest of the league.

Everyone gets a turn on the GC draft lottery, as the system has been set up for them to really never want or need high end picks. Quantity over quality and every other club gets to pick at them on a year by year basis.

We had our turn, it was fun, but really it’s a blight on the league.
 
Difference is Parker just kicked three goals in a Grand Final and is actually part of Sydney’s plans. Jack is fourth in line, trending to be fifth, for his own position and has no prospect of a contract extension from us.

You don’t need to have a win for the sake of having a win when we’re talking 61 vs 67.

3 goals in a GF? I thought you were talking smack until I checked the scores. He kicked 3 junktime goals in the 4th when the game was well and truly buried (hence why I didn't remember). I thought he played terribly when the game was on the line.

I agree that Sydney don't want him to go, which I think is a really poor way to treat a champion trying to extend his career.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top