Two years as a depth player ready to go is probably fine as long as we're only paying him peanuts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think this is a good signing as long as the wage is low
Remembering he’s not best 22 …why would you get someone better unless they were to replace Thilthorpe ( which won’t be happening ) or ROB
Could have chased Weideman , paid him more and for longer term , given up something to get him and he isn’t really any better …. I’d say he’s not as good
Himmelberg has actually had some reasonable AFL performances this year and he’s rucking v well in the sanfl and getting loads of football
We can now trade or or more of Frampton / Mcasey easier if we get decent offers as well
Maybe but i think Tex will be around for at least 2 years... Maybe grab the number 5 next yearWhat do you reckon, grab #13 when Tex retires ?
Cumbersome isn't a word I'd associate with Himmelberg he's really quite athletic and moves pretty well for a big bloke.I know he's inconsistent and can be cumbersome but he's shown enough signs here and there, plus he's still only 24. At the very least, gives some of our young SANFL boys somewhere to kick too. Still a decent option if Thilthorpe, Fog go down.
Pretty obvious the talk there was interest elsewhere was on the money, likely had a 2 year offer on the table elsewhere.Two years is very, very strange. Reid ain’t very good at the old contract thing, is he
Fine to keep as depth, though. You’d think Fish is gone
Obvs other clubs offering 2 year deals2 year deal for a depth player is lunacy. 1 year at the absolute most would have sufficed if we wanted to keep him as a backup. Or a delist re-rookie on 1 year
He might be the one we want to keep out of Frampton and him ( and maybe Mcasey )We're a developing side that should be looking to upgrade every player on our list that isn't best 22. Depth players are okay in the very short term but we're not a finalist so having to blood a raw player isn't too much of a concern. We don't need depth to go deep into finals because we're not even making finals yet.
I agree grabbing someone expensive like Weideman wouldn't be the go, but it could be we end up with a promising key position player in the draft. If we didn't have so many players contracted for so long - already an issue right now, we have very few list spots - we would have the flexibility to assess the list and make calls every year.
With Himmelberg signed up for 2 years we don't have as much flexibility to improve our list at the end of next year. We're doing once again what many people have criticized us for doing which is keeping players we know aren't good enough on the list for too long, rather than looking to shift and upgrade the list.
I don't honestly think the risk of him being poached is very high, it was probably non existent and even if he did get a good 2 year offer somewhere else it's hardly a big deal if he leaves
We're a developing side that should be looking to upgrade every player on our list that isn't best 22. Depth players are okay in the very short term but we're not a finalist so having to blood a raw player isn't too much of a concern. We don't need depth to go deep into finals because we're not even making finals yet.
I agree grabbing someone expensive like Weideman wouldn't be the go, but it could be we end up with a promising key position player in the draft. If we didn't have so many players contracted for so long - already an issue right now, we have very few list spots - we would have the flexibility to assess the list and make calls every year.
With Himmelberg signed up for 2 years we don't have as much flexibility to improve our list at the end of next year. We're doing once again what many people have criticized us for doing which is keeping players we know aren't good enough on the list for too long, rather than looking to shift and upgrade the list.
I don't honestly think the risk of him being poached is very high, it was probably non existent and even if he did get a good 2 year offer somewhere else it's hardly a big deal if he leaves
How does he compare to similar depth types of same role at other clubs ?Has an uncanny knack of playing 10 good minutes of football, generally in the last qtr, out of an entire game..
Has actually helped get us over the line in a couple of our wins this season with a couple of these 10 minute spells..
After being completely invisible for the rest of the game.
But apart from that he’s achieved little else.
What is it 6 years on the list?. Now to be 8..
List clogger. But we have bugger all KPF or KPD depth.
ITK poster on the freo board said freo had absolutely no interest in himm at all.. was all just media BS, who probably got a “leak” from his manager who was trying to give negotiations with the crows a but of a nudge along..
I am sure that we would like all of our fringe players (Strachan, Himmelberg and Frampton) on rolling one year contracts.It depends, but with a 1 year deal you could assess the options after every season. With 2 years we are locked into him even if a better player becomes available next year
I like Charlie Comben at kangas but he’s been too injured to build a case to play 1sWho is the best KPF in the league not getting regular game time?
I still think two years on the senior list could really come back to bite us from a list management perspective, but if he was getting interest from other clubs, we mightn't have had much of a choice. Any replacement backup KPP we could've gotten through a trade would've been given two years anywayHow does he compare to similar depth types of same role at other clubs ?
I’d say pretty well and also pretty cheap
Is getting some 20 possession games at sanfl level and playing more a dual role
Has kicked 4 twice in 2 good wins this year , even the WC game he lifted and nailed his chances
We have far more other problems than Himmelberg being depth in next 2 years and maybe more if he improves a bit