Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some posters call him soft with his effort, he jump across not knowing what was behind him. Walker should have called him it was his mark.If I was tex walker I would be telling the young Josh who got in his way in the last 4 minutes you do it again I will run through you.
Absolutely killed your momentum there
Because they’re cooked trashWhy do Laird and Smith keep running INTO contests when they have the ball instead of AWAY from the contest?
Which is his fault either way.Nicks said our system was right (for the first time this season), but our execution was bad
Blamed player form again
Couldn’t agree more…defence would love the help and gives us a chance to try and score from a turnover instead of Laird, Crouch and O’brien fumbling it around at the stoppageAny danger we could also play a lose man instead of an extra one up at the stoppage
Hell-funny, because so true. Champagne comedy!McHenry - The human handbrake
We've been through this a thousand times. No one ever said he was.Does anyone still actually think Laird is an elite midfielder?
I have no issue with crouch leading the 2nd midfield group of we can surround him with pacey skillful players.In defence of Crouch, I think we need a player like that in the midfield, gets his hands on the ball first and usually uses it well. Keep.
His mark attempt was weak , didn’t want itWas absolutely trying to get the spark going - might have tried too hard, but I won't criticise him for that.
Really?We've been through this a thousand times. No one ever said he was.
Isn’t player development part of the head coach’s role?That was actually 75% better than our first 3 games in terms of skill and ball movement. We might actually beat someone playing like that. Still lacked composure going forward and in front of goal.
Melbourne are probably the best side we've come up against so far imo. Polished and strong defensively.
Much better, but our season is shot so let's * off some dead wood and try some newer players!
Good:
Soligo. He's looking really good.
Keane. Gonna be a general. Can't wait to have Murray back with Keane.
Nankervis was composed under serious pressure. Crazy we didn't go with him round 1.
Liked Berry when he came on. Actually made some play.
Average :
Dawson. Better, but still not at his best.
Crouch okay
Laird good and bad moments. Out of form. That handball to O'Brien was terrible. Thought he was better than most are making out.
Worrell and Butts held up fairly well.
Bad :
Not liking Rachele's start to the year. Lacking class and not getting involved enough. Can blame development, but he's not showing his skills either.
O'Brien not having any impact. Needs to clunk a few marks
Michalaney finally has an average game when the rest of the team picks it up. Would have been nice if he continued his great form. Has been our best up until this week.
Jones just doesn't do enough and isn't getting any better.
Think our player development is really below par compared to other teams. That's going to hold us back from every challenging regardless of who our head coach is.
ABABDoes anyone still actually think Laird is an elite midfielder?
It's a shame, because I quite liked him when he was actually given a chance on the ground. Made a couple of mistakes, but was mostly tidy and composed, more so than most of our players.Cook 56% time on ground
We're experts at giving kids a go without giving them a go
Looked really good in the first qtr. Would love to know the time on ground by qtr.Cook 56% time on ground
We're experts at giving kids a go without giving them a go
Played him in two distinct roles too, wing and forward.Cook 56% time on ground
We're experts at giving kids a go without giving them a go
He peaked as a B grade midfielder. Was never in any serious contention for any non club award in the midfield.Really?
Let's go "A" grader then, does anyone actually think he's an "A" grade midfielder.