- Aug 18, 2018
- 31,845
- 54,151
- AFL Club
- Geelong
I think he'll end up 8 to 14th ishYou cannot be serious. Duncan should be nowhere near top 10
He had some good games and the other players polling votes were hardly consistent.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think he'll end up 8 to 14th ishYou cannot be serious. Duncan should be nowhere near top 10
Needs to fix that for 2025.Seems to float his man looking for the easy ball, works sometimes, not tonight tho.
Fagan all class in his presser.
“This is not Geelong's fault, but if you look at their last game of the season against West Coast, they were 100 points in front at half-time. It was a low-pressure, low-contested game. Then they have the week off, and then they play Port in a final where it was a similar sort of game, low-pressure, low-contest game. Then they have another week off," Fagan said.
"I just felt like, it's good to have the time off, but you need the games that you play to be really hard, tough games, and maybe at the end that showed. Our harder preparation enabled us to run the game out, and I would have thought that would have been a real challenge."
Neales not a full time ruck but Danger could take the Rohan role if he retires with his injury. I know people will mention OHenry but they aren't the same type of player, Dangers speed and tackling and his marking makes him like a Rohan who can occasionally pinch hit in the middle if needed.Might be an unpopular opinion but if we are giving Danger 2 years could he play out of the goal square and Neale can play ruck? I feel Dangers midfield days are coming to and end.
You’re having a laugh mate, surely.
For what reason?
It's not like we were exposed for lack of height
Congrats on winning an elim final, I suppose that's considered good at Hawthorn
Danger doesn’t get a game in our forward line TBH, he’s a mid or bustNeales not a full time ruck but Danger could take the Rohan role if he retires with his injury. I know people will mention OHenry but they aren't the same type of player, Dangers speed and tackling and his marking makes him like a Rohan who can occasionally pinch hit in the middle if needed.
We saw this year in the Dogs game you need 2 tall forwards, if Cameron gets locked down we have nothing.
Neale has to be our FF if fit, he showed a lot this year and I think early next season he will have one of those 4 goal+ break out games.
But we could easily accommodate a forwardline where we have Neale, Cameron and Henry as the talls/leading forwards, Danger/Close/Stengle as the small/pressure forwards, plus considering how often Miers and Mannagh float in and out of the f50 Danger is capable of that, and Danger is good above his head and has pace to lead.
He is as versatile as Rohan, Rohan is a far far more reliable set shot but I would back Danger in to get more of the ball especially if he is up around HFF. Danger also draws teams best players, so potentially means on a night like tonight Neale gets an easier opponent.
My issue with Neale is his marking, its actually pretty shit sometimes, besides Sav ive never seen a bloke get more falcons than him.Neales not a full time ruck but Danger could take the Rohan role if he retires with his injury. I know people will mention OHenry but they aren't the same type of player, Dangers speed and tackling and his marking makes him like a Rohan who can occasionally pinch hit in the middle if needed.
We saw this year in the Dogs game you need 2 tall forwards, if Cameron gets locked down we have nothing.
Neale has to be our FF if fit, he showed a lot this year and I think early next season he will have one of those 4 goal+ break out games.
But we could easily accommodate a forwardline where we have Neale, Cameron and Henry as the talls/leading forwards, Danger/Close/Stengle as the small/pressure forwards, plus considering how often Miers and Mannagh float in and out of the f50 Danger is capable of that, and Danger is good above his head and has pace to lead.
He is as versatile as Rohan, Rohan is a far far more reliable set shot but I would back Danger in to get more of the ball especially if he is up around HFF. Danger also draws teams best players, so potentially means on a night like tonight Neale gets an easier opponent.
Can't help but feel we squandered a golden chance
Guess its ok when you get a real home final like SydneyWhich is why the bullshit knee jerk reaction pre-finals bye is bullshit.
We did, but after hearing Holmes would’ve missed, Jack Henry went off, Bruhn was battling something and Danger potentially suspended, I think we’ve saved ourselves getting battered by Sydney.
Brisbane were primed, quality all over the ground and they executed their plan tonight, although it sucks to lose another PF, we had a lot of inexperienced players out there tonight.
However agree that when you look at it that we were up against an interstate team with a weeks rest and at home at the G, yes that’s a chance gone begging.
The magic of 2022 eases nights like this.
Considering Stengles form tonight, if we had the options on the field I probably would have subbed him and sat Danger in the forwardline if we had decent midfield depth.Danger doesn’t get a game in our forward line TBH, he’s a mid or bust
Atkins tries hard but he struggles to have any offensive impact. He's at best a defensive midfield rotation player but has been forced to play as a starting mid. Bowes is better than Bruhn at this stage but both are B graders at their best. We were beaten by a better midfield that has multiple A graders. We've done really well making up for it in other areas. Too bad it was exposed tonight.Midfield smashed. Neale, Zorko and Dunkley all with 28+.
Atkins, Bowes, Bruhn all under 15. Holmes 3rd most possessions and missed a half.
On to Get Bailey Smith.
More wording for next week, but somewhat true that we had two training runs in a month. Before that saints sped things up in the 2nd half and dominated cats. Scott couldn’t deal with it again weeks later….Ross the boss exposed us with speed on the ball and Fagan learned the lesson.Fagan all class in his presser.
“This is not Geelong's fault, but if you look at their last game of the season against West Coast, they were 100 points in front at half-time. It was a low-pressure, low-contested game. Then they have the week off, and then they play Port in a final where it was a similar sort of game, low-pressure, low-contest game. Then they have another week off," Fagan said.
"I just felt like, it's good to have the time off, but you need the games that you play to be really hard, tough games, and maybe at the end that showed. Our harder preparation enabled us to run the game out, and I would have thought that would have been a real challenge."
Exactly my thoughts on this one.Can't help but feel we squandered a golden chance