
It’s probably fair to describe his game as ‘he played his role’I was a little underwhelmed with Peatling yesterday. He was ok, better than 90% of Berrys games to date.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Carlton v Western Bulldogs - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Dogs at 60% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Supercoach Round 3 SC Talk - Round 3 Trades ,//, AFL Fantasy Round 2 AF Talk - Round 3 AF Trades
It’s probably fair to describe his game as ‘he played his role’I was a little underwhelmed with Peatling yesterday. He was ok, better than 90% of Berrys games to date.
Curtin is more Bontempelli/Jordan Dawson than he is a key defender imo. Absolutely stoked we have him. Looks like he will spend time forward and on the bench with brief spurts in the middle (if yesterday is anything to go by). Wouldn't be surprised to see him have games where he gets 15 and a couple of goals followed by much quieter games. Hopefully in time he is forcing his way into the midfield full-time.Curtin was terrible. Ran around like a headless chook. Got his first touches very close to half time when he took two marks in defence, not up forward.
He doesn't appear to have football instinct and doesn't want to impose himself in any situations.
At the time he was drafted November 2023 will already had committed to picking up Keane. We had Butts, Murray, Worrell and Michalanney. At that time, Himmelberg was also being talked about being turned in to a defender.
At the 2023 draft, Curtin was touted as a tall defender, we just didn't need another tall defender. Also the game was changing from playing three tall forwards to two so there was less need for another tall defender, we enough.
I thought there was an old football saying " don't pick a tall defender early in the draft, you can always find one later on or turn one of your tall forwards in to a tall defender (we found Murray playing country football in NSW). This saying should have been applied also to the drafting of MacAsey at six, what a waste, don't get me started.
Also people were seduced by the odd comments and junior efforts of Curtin at being a big body mid fielder, I would rather have a smaller mid fielder like Serong or Neale that actually can give you value for the sake of being able to say "we have a big bodied mid fielder".
For me to become a Curtin fan he will have to improve a hell of a lot. Please feel free to shoot me down about Curtin and why the Crows needed to draft a tall defender at that time, now we are stuck with a player that we moved up in the draft for and now don't know where to play him. Also you can have a go at me for my thoughts on the drafting of MacAsey.
Schoey looking revitalised, the burst speed is back might be a chance too, Pedlar spent his time split between mid and forward yesterday and that's the best 4 quarter effort I've ever seen from him, if he stays fit geez he's got some real speed and brute strength....and only a couple of scrubber kicks too,I’m sure he’ll get games this year when injuries inevitably hit. Realistically he’s the next mid in line
Fingers crossed he carries over that form to the AFL, once he gets the opportunity
He does a lot of tough defensive stuff in the trenches.I was a little underwhelmed with Peatling yesterday. He was ok, better than 90% of Berrys games to date.
Pedlar’s very exciting at his best. Certainly an AFL-level talentSchoey looking revitalised, the burst speed is back might be a chance too, Pedlar spent his time split between mid and forward yesterday and that's the best 4 quarter effort I've ever seen from him, if he stays fit geez he's got some real speed and brute strength....and only a couple of scrubber kicks too,
Not sure how we got to thatThat's like saying Peatling offers more than Jordy Butts. If Peatling and Crouch can play in the side then so can Peatling and Berry, because they aren't playing the same role.
They were playing seniors, but they were just generally terrible. Zak Jones 11 touches, Jimmy Webster 10 touches, Zaine Cordy 4 touches, Steele and Wilkie were below their best too, both under 20 touches.
If he can have 20 possessions and a goal a week with ALOT of pressure acts using his speed as an ‘ok’ game then we looking very good from himIt’s probably fair to describe his game as ‘he played his role’
Clearly we are effectively injury free right now but suddenly we have a lot of depth - some which we could look to trade out:Pedlar’s very exciting at his best. Certainly an AFL-level talent
Hard to get a gig in our forward line right now, but he should be straight in if one of our smalls are injured
He played fine, I just think many of us are hoping for more than a good role player. Anyway its only one game he’s still got plenty of improvement in him.If he can have 20 possessions and a goal a week with ALOT of pressure acts using his speed as an ‘ok’ game then we looking very good from him
I reckon there’s some people expecting too much, not everyone if going to be Dawson Rankine Soligo
I WASN'T comparing McAsey and Curtin. What I was clearly saying is why pick a tall defender at 6 and 8.I haven't seen McAsey dominate any SANFL game in his 4 years like Curtin did last year in his 1st year. I suggest you watch his draft year more closely, he move and play a lot like Dawson so isn't just pigeon hole as a KPD.
I can’t say whether it’s Nicks call, but it’s seems like a maturity in the coaching group. There is no way that happens last year, even with the 6 day turn around.A tick for Nicks‘ coaching?
What I was clearly saying is why pick a tall defender at 6 and 8.
McAsey wasn't exactly a wasted pick, he had the football talent OK but just never settled in well in Adelaide during the Covid lockdown in Victoria/SA and then his father having a heart attack and being touch and go there for a while didn't help with that as well.I WASN'T comparing McAsey and Curtin. What I was clearly saying is why pick a tall defender at 6 and 8.
From memory Weitering at one and there may be one or two others that were at pick eight or higher it was not necessary and now we have found McAsey to be a wasted pick.
Shit windy weather too.. but yeah.. Pedlar’s best four quarter game in a very long time.Schoey looking revitalised, the burst speed is back might be a chance too, Pedlar spent his time split between mid and forward yesterday and that's the best 4 quarter effort I've ever seen from him, if he stays fit geez he's got some real speed and brute strength....and only a couple of scrubber kicks too,
Curtin was terrible. Ran around like a headless chook. Got his first touches very close to half time when he took two marks in defence, not up forward.
He doesn't appear to have football instinct and doesn't want to impose himself in any situations.
At the time he was drafted November 2023 will already had committed to picking up Keane. We had Butts, Murray, Worrell and Michalanney. At that time, Himmelberg was also being talked about being turned in to a defender.
At the 2023 draft, Curtin was touted as a tall defender, we just didn't need another tall defender. Also the game was changing from playing three tall forwards to two so there was less need for another tall defender, we enough.
I thought there was an old football saying " don't pick a tall defender early in the draft, you can always find one later on or turn one of your tall forwards in to a tall defender (we found Murray playing country football in NSW). This saying should have been applied also to the drafting of MacAsey at six, what a waste, don't get me started.
Also people were seduced by the odd comments and junior efforts of Curtin at being a big body mid fielder, I would rather have a smaller mid fielder like Serong or Neale that actually can give you value for the sake of being able to say "we have a big bodied mid fielder".
For me to become a Curtin fan he will have to improve a hell of a lot. Please feel free to shoot me down about Curtin and why the Crows needed to draft a tall defender at that time, now we are stuck with a player that we moved up in the draft for and now don't know where to play him. Also you can have a go at me for my thoughts on the drafting of MacAsey.
He’s not a tall defender (although he may be able to play that role in time if we want him to )I WASN'T comparing McAsey and Curtin. What I was clearly saying is why pick a tall defender at 6 and 8.
From memory Weitering at one and there may be one or two others that were at pick eight or higher it was not necessary and now we have found McAsey to be a wasted pick.
That's not true. Peatling was okay yesterday. Berry has ranged from okay to good.I was a little underwhelmed with Peatling yesterday. He was ok, better than 90% of Berrys games to date.
‘Played his role’ isn’t derogatory btwIf he can have 20 possessions and a goal a week with ALOT of pressure acts using his speed as an ‘ok’ game then we looking very good from him
I reckon there’s some people expecting too much, not everyone if going to be Dawson Rankine Soligo
Re: McAsey, I think both things can be true. He was definitely affected by the factors you say, but also probably didn’t have the athletic ability, nor the elite stopping ability to really have an AFL impact (despite being a really good overhead mark)McAsey wasn't exactly a wasted pick, he had the football talent OK but just never settled in well in Adelaide during the Covid lockdown in Victoria/SA and then his father having a heart attack and being touch and go there for a while didn't help with that as well.
All the signs are Curtin has 100% bought in and is happy in Adelaide, way way too early for this kind of talk re Curtin,
Those teams were regularly featuring Murph, and McHenry too though. There were... free spots.That’s interesting given Matt Crouch played all year when available last year (with Berry at times) and now with Peatling
Reason being Peatling adds such a better balance to our side as he’s got genuine AFL weapons and not just a foot soldier like Berry