Mackay is on his way back in. Wouldn't surprise me to see him in next week for Milera.VB and Mackay on the emergency list... Would be nice if the likes of Wigg/Menzel even Greenwood could push their way past these guys with SANFL performances
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Mackay is on his way back in. Wouldn't surprise me to see him in next week for Milera.VB and Mackay on the emergency list... Would be nice if the likes of Wigg/Menzel even Greenwood could push their way past these guys with SANFL performances
Please.Match Committee is never easy. I would suggest to those getting personal in this thread to ask themselves how many match committee meetings they have sat in AT ANY LEVEL of footy. If the answer is none, then keep things light and fluffy comensurate with the level of your experience.
Hendo is not best 22. But he is in a winning team. We have played the lowest amount of players in the whole league so far this year. Milera played average last week but he stays too. VB is out now. Hendo will be soon if a young player takes the chance he will be given.
I do see the point that youth is the way. Crows play a consistantly conservative game with selection. Not to everyones taste, but as I said match committee is no bed of roses, which I have had the pleasure of experiencing over the years.
I think we are more than qualified to pass judgement on selection given we watch the bloody games.Please.
We're not splitting the atom. There's no university degree in this, nor is there any exclusive professional body that requires membership.
I've been part of selecting sports teams before, am I more or less qualified to comment because of that fact?
It's really not rocket science and I think the tone of your condescending advice demeans the purpose of this forum, that being a place for opinions from those with more than a passing interest in their football team.
If M Crouch wasn't dropped then after his rest he'd be straight back in.
Hard to take seriously when facts are wrong. missing quite a few finals wins and ignore the fact that we are playing kids and many have held their spot since round 1.
So because people have a (valid) different opinion to you, it's 'bullshit'?
4 weeks ago at the Geelong game, Matt Crouch looked like he was running on the spot he was that slow. He was rested, and the guy(s) ahead of him haven't dropped the ball enough to lose their spot.
It's really not rocket science.
Sarcasm should be reserved for the person who didn't get their facts wrong.
I think the selectors have got the balance spot on this week. I think it would have been a bit to risky to take out another experienced big body in either Thommo or Douglas for this game. I think a lot of people just think we are going to walk this game in which may be the case, By my view is if the Saints bring the A game we might have been to inexperienced to weather it.
I don't buy the call that the coaches were giving Vb one last chance to put a line through his name. Blind freddy could tell he was cooked last year, let alone after rnd one and now after another stinker. Grow some pills afc, tell him enough is enough. Treating our matches like a pension is doing nobody any favours. Also, if Nathan you are a clubman and share a team first attitude, please do a cassisi or even a bloody kornes and put you hand up and retire. You stealing games from youngsters sullies your name and puts our growth in reverse. You are past it, accept it and deal with it. Retire with your head held high like you would expect from a former skipper. Disappointing if in 6 weeks you happen to slide into the a's again and then speak again about how you're best 22, you're not and haven't been for 2 years.
Ok say Thommo goes out ( as predicted) and we lose. Whats your comeback?That's another horrible assertion to make.
If we need Thompson and Douglas yo beat this young st Kilda side at Adelaide oval, we are miles away from where we want and need to be. This st Kilda side is only going to get better over the next 18 months, where we risk stagnating based on player selection.
Ok say Thommo goes out ( as predicted) and we lose. Whats your comeback?
Oh Cmon Sammy .......it's these extremist pessimist views that people post that annoys me ....not based in realityThat's another horrible assertion to make.
If we need Thompson and Douglas yo beat this young st Kilda side at Adelaide oval, we are miles away from where we want and need to be. This st Kilda side is only going to get better over the next 18 months, where we risk stagnating based on player selection.
Maybe but like I said, on this occasion you are inaccurate on all of your facts. Your argument is just not true.With all due respect, some posters on this board would disagree even if the facts were 100% correct.
They find any reason to disagree with the club and what they say.
Oh Cmon Sammy .......it's these extremist pessimist views that people post that annoys me ....not based in reality
Don't know how many times over the last couple of years posters have insisted we have to do another 5 year rebuild, as we're going no-where ......emotive with no base in reality
We select sides to win and at the same time develop players ......this year another two first year players have been developed .....this despite the constant barbs that we don't develop kids
We had one and he was straight back in.....
This board is too slow to recognise poor form .....and too slow to recognise improved form .....Douglas to name 1It was bullshit because your post was bullshit.
He's been dropped and he is in better form than some in the side.
Douglas to name 1.
That's why it was bullshit
Cmon ...not that old clicheAnd over the past 5 years, 2 finals victories and an average finish spot of about 7 or 8. Very middle of the road.
Maybe but like I said, on this occasion you are inaccurate on all of your facts. Your argument is just not true.
Cmon ...not that old cliche
You know all the reasons, but choose to ignore to make a point ......not biting Sam
To be fair I think TSR said any match committee and not specifically AFL.I don't buy the whole "you can't have an opinion on team selection because you've never sat on an AFL match committee before" argument. That would discount this whole forum from making a comment. We all have our ideal "Best 22 to win a premiership" and I reckon if we all posted them they'd look pretty similar.
I like thisWhat does annoy me though is when people pass judgement without all of the facts week to week. There are reasons beyond "they just don't like him" for the selection and non-selection of players. A lot goes on at footy clubs.
The coaching staff and recruiters have a vision of what our "Ultimate 22" looks like, that you can be sure of. What none of us know is what that looks like and I reckon we'd find that a few of the players we have in that 22 haven't even played a game at the club yet.
The AFC started an internal rebuild only 30 games ago and I believe there has been a marked improvement in many areas, and slower in others. See what happens.