FR0GGY
From a cartel villa in Tuscany
The incidents are so different, I have no idea why anyone would put it as a side x side comparison.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
The incidents are so different, I have no idea why anyone would put it as a side x side comparison.
How about the fact that everyone except the happy clappers realise it's not that "Nicks plays a kid", it's the fact that he only does when there's injuries to his senior players and not when the senior players should be dropped for continuous poor form?
The incidents are so different, I have no idea why anyone would put it as a side x side comparison.
View attachment 2044388
Wow almost as if you can't just evaluate players based on their stats. This was his opponent, he's a good lockdown who also has a habit of taking a clutch intercept mark when required.
I don't really care - I'm just annoyed our best player got rubbed out for 4 weeks.
Pedlar on Stewart, Keys on Saad and many others.The problem is Nicks hasn’t considered match up selections before and now he does.
I know when I see a bullshit artist and he has it in spades.
Pedlar on Stewart, Keys on Saad and many others.
I think he was proposing the oppositeWhat? Isn’t he suggesting trading our 2025 1st and keeping collingwoods? I can’t see any reason we finish above them?
Nah he’s saying trade our first into this year and get collingwoods 2025 1st pick for Keane and keep that.I think he was proposing the opposite
You said he hadn’t considered matchup selections before where clearly had. Whether they were successful or not is another thing.Fail, Pass (early last year tho), others ?????
Anderson/Flanders 35 disposals
Nick Daicos 41 disposals
Dylan Moore 5 goals
Neale/Dunkley 21 disposals/23 disposals first half only
Errol Guiden 35 disposals
We have our own stat padder, Laird, who just isn’t considered by the opposition because he has **** all hurt factor.
Those weren’t selections though, they were in the team already.You said he hadn’t considered matchup selections before where clearly had. Whether they were successful or not is another thing.
I actually think Laird is becoming a bigger problem than Smith.How about we realise we don’t have anywhere near enough senior players
Walker Laird Smith (recently dropped), Crouch out injured, Dawson
Second tier O’Brien(recently dropped and we saw why he generally gets picked), Keays, Murphy and probably Fog
So this dropping senior players really comes down to Smith - who was dropped - and Murphy who hasn’t been
Lots of posts complaining essentially about 1 player - and the 3 we all would like to see get in the senior side (Curtin, Edwards and Ryan) wouldn’t play the role anyway
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
We should seriously consider moving Laird on. We have Crouch & would prefer to keep Berry around, but can't play them all in the same side.I actually think Laird is becoming a bigger problem than Smith.
Nicks bangs on about values but the way Laird is playing completely goes against that. Cracking the shits at team mates, selling team mates into trouble to get a cheap stat (see the fumble and shit handball that started the rot against Sydney) and his refusal to be accountable (which when you are matched up against the opposition's best or second best player every week is a major problem). Smith meanwhile is trying to do the right thing, but is just cooked.
There's a reason Laird has never been a part of the leadership group.
Four match ban upheld for Rankine
Maybe look beyond disposal counts and you'll get your answer as to why he's getting a game.
He was always drafted as the Luke Brown replacement. And that’s not a sexy job. Not everyone gets to run around and chase the ball
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
It's a fair argument though. Given the huge step up from SANFL to AFL, defenders should be able to nullify their opponent and accumulate possessions.
I actually think Laird is becoming a bigger problem than Smith.
Nicks bangs on about values but the way Laird is playing completely goes against that. Cracking the shits at team mates, selling team mates into trouble to get a cheap stat (see the fumble and shit handball that started the rot against Sydney) and his refusal to be accountable (which when you are matched up against the opposition's best or second best player every week is a major problem). Smith meanwhile is trying to do the right thing, but is just cooked.
There's a reason Laird has never been a part of the leadership group.
The incidents are so different, I have no idea why anyone would put it as a side x side comparison.
Bond making his debut is always something I can get excited for and potentially the Bearded Monster coming back in, but otherwise it was slim pickings without Izak.Not sure what is a reason to go to the game given Izak isn’t playing?
No doubt he puts bums on seats.
I think it's a bit too late for that, we lost that years ago15 minutes. We paid $10k and flew a bunch of people over to be granted enough time for opening remarks and a few minutes of laughter, I mean deliberation. I know there's a component of sticking up for the player, but gee, you don't want to have it destroy your veneer of competence.
I am going Saturday to see the younger players play primarily. Max, Soligo, Dowling, Taylor, Bond etc. This season to me has long since been about finals but is now all about developmentNot sure what is a reason to go to the game given Izak isn’t playing?
No doubt he puts bums on seats.
We should seriously consider moving Laird on. We have Crouch & would prefer to keep Berry around, but can't play them all in the same side.
We need to be making decisions for the future... which includes not playing Smith too.