- Sep 21, 2004
- 39,877
- 30,048
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Norwood & Liverpool.
I reckon there's a bit of "fork all Youse"in his commentsWithout a shred of self awareness.
On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I reckon there's a bit of "fork all Youse"in his commentsWithout a shred of self awareness.
Kochie isn't clever enough to hatch a scheme like this.
Why would he?Id be amazed if Clarko didn't talk to Amon and maybe Bergman and Hayes while he was here.
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Might be a bit late for Pittard.
Roos' massive cull: North delists ELEVEN after horror season
North Melbourne has delisted a quarter of its list with 11 players not offered contractswww.afl.com.au
Was this from yesterday?
This seems quite plausible. Which would mean he's committed to norf. Which would mean Hinkley ain't going anywhere.Speaking to Horne Francis' parents according to the North board
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
I remember Tom Rockliffe saying over a month ago that Clarkson had been phoning players in Adelaide to get a feeling on whether they'd move. A trip to Adelaide in the final round and he could be speaking to a number of South Australian players as well as Adelaide agents. Or he's visiting a sick friendThis seems quite plausible. Which would mean he's committed to norf. Which would mean Hinkley ain't going anywhere.
Also, would not be surprised if he's been talking to our players - the gnome has always had a hard-on for Port players
This seems quite plausible. Which would mean he's committed to norf. Which would mean Hinkley ain't going anywhere.
Also, would not be surprised if he's been talking to our players - the gnome has always had a hard-on for Port players
Because honest Ken is a modern-day saint whom single-handedly save the Port Adelaide Football Club from the depths of hell. You don't go disrespecting the canonised.From the North board: "Sorry to be asking an obvious question but how the hell it’s disrespectful to Kenny who’s got 12 months on his contract but seems to be ok to do the same to Rutten???"
They've seen this s**t for 5 minutes and they're already realising how *ed up it is.
From 0:40
It's probably because Hinkley, much to the chagrin of this forum, has made three prelim finals, won two qualifying finals, won two elimination finals and won one semi final in his tenure as coach with Port whereas Rutten has made one final and lost it as coach with Essendon. I'd also say that the media is aware that Hinkley has been dealt a bad hand with injuries etc during the seasons where things have gone pear shaped.From the North board: "Sorry to be asking an obvious question but how the hell it’s disrespectful to Kenny who’s got 12 months on his contract but seems to be ok to do the same to Rutten???"
They've seen this s**t for 5 minutes and they're already realising how *ed up it is.
That may influence your opinion on whether either should coach next year, but it's not at all relevant to the contract they have. Both have another year to run and have not been sacked. So if that makes it disrespectful to speak about replacing one, its also disrespectful to speak about replacing the other.It's probably because Hinkley, much to the chagrin of this forum, has made three prelim finals, won two qualifying finals, won two elimination finals and won one semi final in his tenure as coach with Port whereas Rutten has made one final and lost it as coach with Essendon. I'd also say that the media is aware that Hinkley has been dealt a bad hand with injuries etc during the seasons where things have gone pear shaped.
Essendon doesn't have that issue. Their problem is purely mental.
It's probably because Hinkley, much to the chagrin of this forum, has made three prelim finals, won two qualifying finals, won two elimination finals and won one semi final in his tenure as coach with Port whereas Rutten has made one final and lost it as coach with Essendon. I'd also say that the media is aware that Hinkley has been dealt a bad hand with injuries etc during the seasons where things have gone pear shaped.
Essendon doesn't have that issue. Their problem is purely mental.
You’re such a poor quality troll. Keep working at it though - one day you’ll be as good as thundercloud.It's probably because Hinkley, much to the chagrin of this forum, has made three prelim finals, won two qualifying finals, won two elimination finals and won one semi final in his tenure as coach with Port whereas Rutten has made one final and lost it as coach with Essendon. I'd also say that the media is aware that Hinkley has been dealt a bad hand with injuries etc during the seasons where things have gone pear shaped.
Essendon doesn't have that issue. Their problem is purely mental.
Hinkley has been at every retirement presser I can remember, it feels a bit set in stone with him.Or maybe, just maybe, Robbie - who is ALWAYS reserved and reluctant to talk about himself - actually wanted his coach to be by his side for the presser.
Lol excuses excuses as per usual. What exactly was the excuse you were running with post prelim last season?It's probably because Hinkley, much to the chagrin of this forum, has made three prelim finals, won two qualifying finals, won two elimination finals and won one semi final in his tenure as coach with Port whereas Rutten has made one final and lost it as coach with Essendon. I'd also say that the media is aware that Hinkley has been dealt a bad hand with injuries etc during the seasons where things have gone pear shaped.
Essendon doesn't have that issue. Their problem is purely mental.
Why is it far-fetched? If he's committed to norf and sees JHF as a potential flight risk, coming and speaking to his parents in person to assure them that he's there for the long haul would just make sense.Do you really think that? seems far fetched doesn't it.
I'll take the job if your son stayz......
Do you even read the stuff back that you post? Hinkley pissed up the wall 2 home prelims. That in itself is inexcusable and you sit here and pot a coach in year 2 for having a team thats mentally weak? We are living in year 10 buddy.
In year two, Hinkley was coaching a prelim final against Hawthorn with the likes of Jake Neade, Andrew Moore and Cam O'Shea in his best 22. It's also clear that Hinkley hasn't lost the players this year like Rutten has. The only agitation for change is coming from impatient fans who, let's face it, if we had played Sam Hayes for every game would be complaining that not playing Georgiades was the reason why we didn't make finals this year.
The situations are not even remotely the same.