Opinion Sack Hinkley 7 - "Turn it around or watch out"

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
From the Koch thread:

View attachment 1486884

I’d like to think he’s trying to force a nice compensation deal, but we all know he’s not that clever.
You're right he's not that clever and as Chairman, he's too emotionally connected to Hinkley. We can never trust this guy to do the best thing by the Club - look at the massive sample size he's given us.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Koch licking Ken's balls on AA this morning.
"Look at the last 2 weeks how well we can play with a healthy list"
#killme

Even though the ‘We Do’Nt HaVe A RuCkMaN’ situation hasn’t changed one bit.
 
Koch is a w***er and needs to get out of the club and off sunrise. This morning reporting that Essendon are "into Ken" and Koch quickly mentions, "tell them they are dreaming" and "why would Ken want to go to a club like Essendon"

Extension imminent

On Pixel 3 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Those comments by the silly kokpaigner are just about a guarantee for kern that he won't need much incentive to pull the trigger on another extension.
As has already been suggested by others, if kern has the Power at 7 - 4 at the bye we could be stuck with him for another 3 years.

Hopefully there are stronger minds on the board who can put the clamps on any more of the kokmeister's BS, but I definitely won't be holding my breath waiting for any of them to show some comic cuts.
 
From the Koch thread:

View attachment 1486884

I’d like to think he’s trying to force a nice compensation deal, but we all know he’s not that clever.

All that aside, what sort of a club chairman blurts out shit like "who would want to go to a club like Essendon?". What a completely inappropriate and offensive comment for a chairman to make of another club.
 
This is why an extension next year is the short priced favourite of all potential outcomes
I have little doubt that Ken will be extended, which is precisely why Koch needs to **** off.
We can bang on about Ken not being up to it, but it's Koch and the board that keep extending him...they are cancers.
 
All that aside, what sort of a club chairman blurts out s**t like "who would want to go to a club like Essendon?". What a completely inappropriate and offensive comment for a chairman to make of another club.
He actually thinks he is playing 3d chess and putting doubt in Ken's mind about going so he can keep his master coach.

On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
All that aside, what sort of a club chairman blurts out s**t like "who would want to go to a club like Essendon?". What a completely inappropriate and offensive comment for a chairman to make of another club.

Just to add to this, we're talking here about the guy who said he wants Port Adelaide to be everyone's second team all those years ago. And here he is potting other clubs so gratuitously.
What a complete ******* he is.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Koch licking Ken's balls on AA this morning.
"Look at the last 2 weeks how well we can play with a healthy list"
#killme

If it needed to be proved, this kind of thing shows Koch's complete ignorance when it comes to football.

This week's was game that, despite our dominance, showed the flaws in our team.

We let the Crows' ruck dominate by not having a ruck. Fogarty showed Jonas's weaknesses as a key defender. Our forward line was way too congested for too much of the game. The tactic of having an extra player around stoppages led to rushed and ugly forward entries, particularly in the first half. We relied on individual brilliance and lacked a generally cohesive gameplan, yet again.

These are the kinds of things that get found out again and again against talented, well-coached teams.

A big part of the problem is not necessarily David's ignorance. It is his unwillingness to accept that he is ignorant. If he accepted it, he could take advice from others. Instead, he just blusters through with an attempt to put up a facade of authority. That's what dilettantes do.
 
Just to add to this, we're talking here about the guy who said he wants Port Adelaide to be everyone's second team all those years ago. And here he is potting other clubs so gratuitously.
What a complete ******* he is.
Yep 100% arse about.

All talk in the media and marshmallows on field and in the board room

On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
If it needed to be proved, this kind of thing shows Koch's complete ignorance when it comes to football.

This week's was game that, despite our dominance, showed the flaws in our team.

We let the Crows' ruck dominate by not having a ruck. Fogarty showed Jonas's weaknesses as a key defender. Our forward line was way too congested for too much of the game. The tactic of having an extra player around stoppages led to rushed and ugly forward entries, particularly in the first half. We relied on individual brilliance and lacked a generally cohesive gameplan, yet again.

These are the kinds of things that get found out again and again against talented, well-coached teams.

A big part of the problem is not necessarily David's ignorance. It is his unwillingness to accept that he is ignorant. If he accepted it, he could take advice from others. Instead, he just blusters through with an attempt to put up a facade of authority. That's what dilettantes do.
It's called the Dunning Kruger effect. Koch is too dumb to know that's he's too dumb.

Sent from my PH-1 using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Koch not talking Hinkley down keeps his value up.

Challenging Essendon may make them want to move harder!

Though I'm not holding my breath that he's playing chess.
 
Nobody wants him. Give yourself over to the idea that he's coaching again next year.
I keep resigning myself to it, but there keeps appearing a chink of hope.
 
Koch not talking Hinkley down keeps his value up.

Challenging Essendon may make them want to move harder!

Though I'm not holding my breath that he's playing chess.

The idea of David Koch being able to play Essendon the way Hinkley and Blucher have continually played him is a pipe dream we should probably let go of for our own sanity.
 
With a weak draw and trading for a player like Dunkley we will be making finals next year meaning Hinkley will get another extension.

We are still a few years away from any sort of recovery unless there is a board change which seems less likely than a Hinkley sacking.

I picked us to finish 10th this year (which somehow ended up being too optimistic lol) and think we're still likely to miss finals again next year.

I think most of the issues from this year remain.

Dunkley will be a good addition if we get him but there is downside risk with Boak. If we don't get Dunkley then there is significant downside risk in the midfield.

The entire game plan relies on Dixon. There is no reason to think this will change. He's only getting older and is as injury prone as ever.

The ruck situation is not being addressed. Lycett is getting on. They don't rate Hayes. Teakle is more a Finlayson pseudo ruckman.

And obviously we're still coached by Daddy Donuts lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top