- Sep 29, 2014
- 3,578
- 7,443
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
What would you pay for Lever?
If you're asking Snoop he said Broomy and Pick 6
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
What would you pay for Lever?
I guess... TBH I thought that Crocker was an overager too, but I'd still have Phillips listed as one of the kids.Phillips is a year older and games wise he's allot more mature as well.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
I doHe's a ball butcher, Crows fans were quite happy to see the back of him. I don't think a scrubber getting useless possessions is what Carlton needed.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
That's a throw away line. Perhaps I should have explained my logic in more detail.
Trading Sidebottom is a hypothetical which doesn't suggest that I want that to necessarily happen, or that I don't love the club any less than anybody else here. Sure some may find it contentious, however it stimulates debate and discussion.
Sure, I agree there is a fine line that a club must maintain with loyalty to players and supporters etc.. to manage equilibrium, but winning premierships is business and sometimes very difficult decisions need to be made for the greater good.
We have a pretty healthy bunch of mids now (and upcoming) and there is a strong consensus that we're short of a couple of KPPs across the board and keeping our 1st Rd pick for this year's draft could land a Brander type KPP?
Although some people would be very disappointed with losing Sidey, an audacious coach/line manager may realise that "you need to give something to get something".
Would this hypothetical trade/draft scenario (with a mature/young variable) be a win or a loss for the club 2018?
In: Lever, Reid, Brander
Out: Sidey, 1st Rd (2017)
I wouldn't have thought this to be bannable?
Some good players invited to the state combine this year. Will be interesting to see how he goes. The knock on him will be his pace from all reports.Marty Hore invited to the AFL draft combine.
What a tartMarty Hore invited to the AFL draft combine.
Marty Hore invited to the AFL draft combine.
Serious question?
Is Tom Rockliff looming as leaving QLD?
Are we interested? Is he of interest to us?
Is he worth it?
Assuming deal doesn't cost the farm
Just the state combine, not national iirc?Marty Hore invited to the AFL draft combine.
There was an article somewhere the other day saying Port were the front runners.Serious question?
Is Tom Rockliff looming as leaving QLD?
Are we interested? Is he of interest to us?
Is he worth it?
Assuming deal doesn't cost the farm
I think I heard that.There was an article somewhere the other day saying Port were the front runners.
Great analysis Snoop! Did you leave Brown out on purpose or did you accidently overlook him?
Serious question?
Is Tom Rockliff looming as leaving QLD?
Are we interested? Is he of interest to us?
Is he worth it?
Assuming deal doesn't cost the farm
Steele + for Lynch. Sign Rockliff to replace Steele. Food for thought.
accidentally overlooked
Clubs are sniffing around!
Watch this space, IMO. Bringing him in allows us to trade out quality to give extra currency to land a tall.
Steele + for Lynch. Sign Rockliff to replace Steele. Food for thought.
Ah, so this was what the overall deal was in relation to Steele in the other thread.
Much more palatable with Lynch coming in as well. Would make our midfield brigade a bit too Grunty but if that gets Lynch over line this year then...
Not quite the discussion, but very similar. I would look to move Pendles into Steele's role on the outside.
For mine I think we will be delisting
White
Blair
Oxley
Sier
Schade
Sinclair - at best I think he will go to rookie list.
Crocker - I suspect they will persist but chance to go rookie list
and I would listen to any offers for;
Keefe
Langdon
Aish
Broomhead
Ramsay
I think we have a lot of depth on the list but not enough high end talent and from a list point of view I would delist / trade and aim up at getting more high end talent via trade / draft and Free agency and clear some space on the list.
Lever or McGovern would be a priority. I would prefer Lever because I think paired with Goldsack and Ben Reid they would control the back. For mine pick 6 and Broomhead would likely get that done. If Scharenberg then think you would get something back through an improved pick.
I would take Sam Reid as a Free Agent. he comes with risks but he is better than White bc he can actually read the ball in flight and move around multiple positions much better.
If there was somehow enough space to take Pittard as a running back that would be icing on the cake but Varcoe can play that role for a while yet.
None of that impinges on making a massive offer for Tom Lynch if he leaves but whilst there is a bit of talk about it you can't bank on it for mine and if they do appoint Buckley it would be madness.
That would give a side like;
B Pittard, Lever, Goldsack
HB Howe, B.Reid, Maynard
C Crisp, Pendlebury, Sidebottom
HF De Goey, Moore, Wells
F Fasolo, S.Reid, Elliott
Foll Grundy, Adams, Treloar
Int Scharenberg, Varcoe, Hoskin-Elliott, Greenwood
Depth
Mature - Dunn, Phillips, Thomas, Sinclair, Smith, Wills, Mayne
Kids - Kirby, Daicos, McCarthy, Crocker, McClarty
That would give you 30-32 senior / mature bodies and leave 10-12 spots for some kids. Reality is wouldn't make that many changes but the first priority should be to improve that best 22 and then aim for 10 more senior / mature types that can play at any stage with the balance as kids. This year not a bad year to have 5-6 picks between 20-50.
Something I just do not understand, if I may ask?
Clubs would love to have a gun ten year ruckman of A grade potential.
So why when we have such a potential being would we even consider swapping him to use at best a C grade to B grade ruck option?
Just makes no sense to give away your prime beef in the hope you get a different slab of beef who might en be mutton dressed up as lamb.
I have a very uneasy feeling that we will see Blair be offered another year.
Hopefully I'm wrong.
Sinclair I think they will persists with was in some good form prior to injury, gives us run and pace off HB and is still only 25. If he does another major injury then it will be bye bye next year imo.