- Jul 8, 2017
- 24,134
- 70,302
- AFL Club
- Richmond
He probably knocked back a 7 year contract from Norf.Exactly, it's the only way they were gonna keep him. Sloane and his manager played it perfectly.
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
He probably knocked back a 7 year contract from Norf.Exactly, it's the only way they were gonna keep him. Sloane and his manager played it perfectly.
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
Exactly, it's the only way they were gonna keep him. Sloane and his manager played it perfectly.
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
And traumatised on their preseason camp by the Tigers theme song.Been a shockin 10mnths for the crows.
Lose the GF
Low ball and Lose Lever
Recruit Gibbs
Spooky minds camp
Betts pissed off
McGovern wants out
Sign Sloane who won't last 12mnths on a 5yr deal.
Geez 5 years for a player thats body is banged up is a riskAnd Sloane has just signed a new 5 year deal at Adelaide
http://www.afc.com.au/news/2018-07-11/sloane-a-crow-for-life
But on a positive note they still have the best captain in the league to lead them back to the topBeen a shockin 10mnths for the crows.
Lose the GF
Low ball and Lose Lever
Recruit Gibbs
Spooky minds camp
Betts pissed off
McGovern wants out
Sign Sloane who won't last 12mnths on a 5yr deal.
Dreaditation Club.But on a positive note they still have the best captain in the league to lead them back to the top
Desparation by a club in panic.Geez 5 years for a player thats body is banged up is a risk
No this is a load of crap !
Where he was picked up does matter and if you dont think a Rookie selection is chance given by the club to a player that nobody els wants then you are delusional its not like he was piced at #6 , #18 or #40 where there could have been another club that would have taken him - He effectively took the last seat on the bus that richmond gave him so yeah he should be grateful thats why you always hear of players like Lambert,Foley,Grimes,Castagna being so grateful for the club giving them the 'Chance'
You talk about how he worked his ass off etc etc etc , How about the recognition to the club its coaches and fitness staff and the development that has 'Made' Him the player he is now. Prior to being given a 'Chance' He was a short midfgielder that didnt get enough posessions and lacked awareness and was snubbed my most clubs BUT Richmond took the chance and developed him and gave him a role and a role thats probably the easiest for him to succeed in.
He is not Docherty or Simpson or Laird yet to be setting his price and playing in a weak team with a weak defence , He is playing in a premiership team with the best defence in the league and allowed the time to play so freely.
From the 2014 Rookie draft there would be at most 6-7 players that have made it and playing regular games from 70 selection
Richmond have 3 players getting regular games and Ivan soldo on the verge doing well
Lambert
Castagna
Short
Is this just a coincidence ??? I would say bloody good development when you add in the following year that Callum Moore & Mabior Chol also looking the goods so far.
Think you are under selling what the club has done short
He is not the captain anymore, he gave that up a few months ago.Maybe and the fact he has a young family now and is the captain of the Lions...might make it difficult for him to leave Qld...
https://www.couriermail.com.au/spor...r/news-story/62bb622a0cd2c4076bc6188e32945ac3
Its not the point. if dusty want to keep the team together, get better players also, then IMO only i think he got a little more from than he should have.Danger took 800k 2 years before Dusty, the salary cap rose between 20-25% in those 2 years. Which would make 800k about 960-1mill. You can be assured that Danger had the automatic pay rise from the cap in his contract.
And Dusty is a better player hence he gets 1.1 mill
I liedThat just doesn't add up.I'm over 50 and I'm pretty sure the flea won a flag while i was in my teens.
Malcom Shorton.I lied
**** me you amaze me. Three years ago when Ben Lennon was at odds with signing a new contract, you abused him and said he hadn't done anything to deserve that type of contract and he was just potential based on a pick. But fast forward to now where a rookie pick with runs on the board and one of the better rebounding defenders in the competition and here you're still demanding he re-signs for less than his worth and that how dare he ask for more money than the club would like to give him. Which one is it? Do we only pay our players good money if they're high picks or do we pay them on their output?
Well done to our coaching and fitness staff on doing their jobs. Im sure their bank accounts reflect that.
Doesn't matter who the **** he is and how much others earn, all that matters is how much other clubs and our club value him at. If Sydney value him at 450k, Carlton at 500k and Richmond at 300k. Then it is up to Richmond and Short to meet somewhere it the middle and if that can't be done then explore a trade. Shorts value is determined on what offers clubs are prepared to pay him based on his performances for Richmond and he is within his right to ask for more from Richmond if clubs are offering him more than what Richmond is. Also just because he is allowed play a free role doesn't devalue him, it the same role 17 other clubs in the league would have him playing and he do a better job of it for most those teams then the guys that they currently have playing the role.
Do you know what Lambert, Castagna and Short all have in common? They are three of the hardest workers at the club. During preseason they are regularly top of the testing and always come back in better shape then they finished the season. That allows them to push themselves even further and aren't playing catch up. A big reason for the why club has turned the corner is we started drafting these types who are naturally fit and strong but also very hard working instead of relying on more naturally talented kids who may or may not be prepared to work hard. Far easier to develop players who want to be developed rather than players who are simply happy to make it on to an AFL list.
Was I wrong ???
And not wrong Now , Only read the first paragraph as the rest is Rubbish