- Jan 7, 2010
- 12,823
- 37,646
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Strikers
When it was wearing an opposition guernsey!When did Conca ever hit a target?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
When it was wearing an opposition guernsey!When did Conca ever hit a target?
It's just an example.how does this actuall work,,,,if we give bulldogs pick 26 and 30 they give us pick 17 is that correct ??
Think its a perfect storm mate.
Injuries have been a huge factor, now that is not an excuse but a fact. Till the bye rounds we had consistently 10 of our top 22 players out. We still managed however to still win more games then we lost so that was a positive. What's also hurt us is that the past fortnight after getting players back who in my opinion are still under done, we also have hand players injured during games, 4 against the saints and 3 against GCS.
Let me be clear, that is not the only reason why we lost but IMO it has an effect and you asked my opinion.
So we have a playing list who has played a taxing game plan the past 4 years, great success which means an extra 16 weeks of high intensity footy. Add the fact this off season was dramatically shorter then normal and its a longer season, our older boys bodies broke. It's not because dimma has lost the players and other rubbish in my opinion it is the fact our older types have been really exposed with the way the game's changed due to the rule changes, stack on shorter preseason which in turn increases our injury toll and boom we are where we are. Also lets not forget we are an assistant coach short due to the 100k fine. We have not been able to replace Leppa due to it and have had to change our coaches across all lines to compensate.
Is it disaster time ? Yes if you think footy stops this year and never is played again. IMO its not a disaster and may be a blessing in disguise. If we make the 8 great but if we dont we have a fantastic draft hand, we have a few fantastic targets we have identified to bring into the club. We wont have a dramatically shorten pre season like this year, so we can have full conditioning that our list needs and we still, make no mistake have very good players at the club.
I am happy to wager against anyone that we will play at minimum a PF next year. So those writing us off are more hoping so without looking at the big picture.
How can you joke in these horrendous times we are going through? Don't you know we are in a crisis ? We have a lot of funerals to go to and lots of births to attend. People are on edge and you are joking How Dare Youfu** man i was taking the piss only ******* joking
Good thinking 99 , they’d be the first list I’d be looking over . Ed Richards for a r2 gets done I’d say , straight onto a wing for usIt's just an example.
Western Bulldogs need points to secure their F/S selection. So a club in our position could theoretically bundle up a bunch of later picks which are worth more "points" than the WB 1st pick.
But there's so much that can happen until trade period that it's all guess work.
Definitely need 1-2 given where our lists atI’d be curious whether we target another KPD in the 23-26 age bracket or do we go draft a kid.
Captain Blood would not have approved!Good thinking 99 , they’d be the first list I’d be looking over . Ed Richards for a r2 gets done I’d say , straight onto a wing for us
Couldn’t imagine Daniel Rioli wanting to hang around while Ugle-Hagen takes his missus and then his spot in the team aswell.Not sure if it’s been mentioned or not, but With Ugle-Hagan potentially attainable… what would we have to give up to throw our hat in the ring?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This!Fair point.View attachment 1169394
I'd rather keep 26 and 30. We got Bolton with 26 didn't we? I'd back our recruiters to pick two good players with the picks we have, rather then 1 good player with 17It's just an example.
Western Bulldogs need points to secure their F/S selection. So a club in our position could theoretically bundle up a bunch of later picks which are worth more "points" than the WB 1st pick.
But there's so much that can happen until trade period that it's all guess work.
The issue with just sticking to the draft is that for the most part whoever we draft will be realistically 2 - 3 years away from being able to solidly contribute and make a difference on field plus we are restricted by who is actually available at those picksI'd rather keep 26 and 30. We got Bolton with 26 didn't we? I'd back our recruiters to pick two good players with the picks we have, rather then 1 good player with 17
Think I'd rather we set up.for the next ten years than the next two years. It's right in the palm of our hand...The issue with just sticking to the draft is that for the most part whoever we draft will be realistically 2 - 3 years away from being able to solidly contribute and make a difference on field plus we are restricted by who is actually available at those picks
Trading for established players let’s us target specifically what we need and players who can slot straight in to make a difference now
We have enough picks and depth to do both if we play our cards rightThink I'd rather we set up.for the next ten years than the next two years. It's right in the palm of our hand...
Cheers ,thanks for the explanationIt's just an example.
Western Bulldogs need points to secure their F/S selection. So a club in our position could theoretically bundle up a bunch of later picks which are worth more "points" than the WB 1st pick.
But there's so much that can happen until trade period that it's all guess work.
The suggestion was trade picks 26 and 30 for pick 17. I would rather 2 picks in the second round then just one pick being end of first round.The issue with just sticking to the draft is that for the most part whoever we draft will be realistically 2 - 3 years away from being able to solidly contribute and make a difference on field plus we are restricted by who is actually available at those picks
Trading for established players let’s us target specifically what we need and players who can slot straight in to make a difference now
Did the same with us losing every game just for the sake of it.Just did the projected ladder for the remaining games for the year and had Geelong 4th, Richmond 11th, Stkilda 13th and Gold Coast 16th.
Would give us picks 8, 15, 24, 26, 38 and 44