referring to off-field....I don't know what's funnier; Carlton only getting a third round return for a #6 pick or the article describing him as a "playmaker".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
referring to off-field....I don't know what's funnier; Carlton only getting a third round return for a #6 pick or the article describing him as a "playmaker".
To be eligible for the Pre Season Supplemental Period you have to have nominated for the draft and been overlooked in both.Why do we have to pick up Tarrant as a free agent though?
He doesn’t have a contract so we can sign him after the trade/draft period.
We have done that with Mansell, Stack ect.
Plus north did offer him a contract so I’m unsure if that also becomes a factor in his eligibilityTo be eligible for the Pre Season Supplemental Period you have to have nominated for the draft and been overlooked in both.
I reckon there's a couple of clubs that would pick him up in the rookie draft before we get the chance to use the PSSP.
No current season stats available
Hypothetical: Pick 22 for picks 41, 47 and the Tigs future 2nd
Agree.I’ll be upset if we can’t trade up and get Ward.
Our biggest issue is the midfield but I reckon we’re one fun midfielder away from being all set again.
Pick 7 (9 basically) may only bet us a pretty good player, but I’d love a genuine gun which we haven’t had in ages, and one that’s ready made. If we don’t get in a ready made midfielder then we’re stuck a bit, I feel.
Maybe the club is banking on our return to fitness plus internal improvements from guys like Ross, RCD and Dow to lift us up again. I don’t mind it, but just not sure it’ll happen. Yes a draft pick is speculative but pick 3 (5) is very likely to be a gun footballer and we badly need a guy like Ward.
PSD doesn’t really get used anymore since teams can sign players all the way up to March now.Just let him walk to the PSD if we don’t get any compo better than whatNorth have offered. North lose pick 1 in PSD and I agree he’s a dud. Look on the bright side we’re gaining a list spot.
I like your thinking but we have to be careful in what we give away. Most draft pundits are saying that it's a very even draft from 6-30 meaning that we have a good chance of picking up a good player with our 2nd round picks.OK. I'm trying to take all emotion out of this and look as rationally as possible:
Gold Coast were our main competitor for Bulldog's pick 17.
I was actually hoping that they would concentrate on Collingwood and leave the Bulldogs for us, but had underestimated what ******* idiots Collingwood are.
I didn't think they would offer their whole 2022 draft hand for points.
Anyway, it's done.
We are still in the box seat to deal with the Bulldogs - picks 28, 42, 47 worth 1388 points for their 1025 points. I'm leaving the compo pick out of this as unsure whether it can be traded until all free agency is completed - particularly Tarrant.
The risks now are that the nutters at Collingwood may now look at offering a package so that they have less picks to take to the draft. It would be crazy to sell the farm for all those points, then lose points by packaging them to the Bulldogs, but, hey, Collingwood...????
Depending on what Geelong get for Jordan Clark, they may also be in contention.
If they get a pick in the 20s, then they could afford to package 30, 32, 55 for pick 17 - still leaving them with pick 17, Clarke pick, 34 - that's 1420 points on offer.
Depends on how many picks they plan on using as to whether this is a strategy they would employ.
Callum Coleman-Jones. Unfortunately we were never going to get full value for him. Pick 38 (now 40) with Tarrant thrown in as a compo-protecting sweetener (given that he won't give North any compo anyway - so costs them absolutely nothing to include him) was always about the best we were likely to get. If they make it their 2022 third rounder instead that is pretty much the same given I don't expect them to climb too far up the ladder.
Problem being is that North can decide not to deal for either of them and it makes basically no difference to them, but does to us.
I'd hold out for the deal above. They start by wanting an extra round 4 pick from us - we ask for a pick upgrade from them included - hopefully it settles.
Then means we could substitute pick 38 for 47 in our offer to the Dogs, adding 150 extra points if we need to outbid Geelong.
Picks 7, 15, 17, 26, 47. North's early third rounder( 2021 or 2022?), Tarrant, full 2022 draft hand.
Agree the points are similar (pick 22 is worth 50 or so less if I remember correctly but the Pies don't really need more points and can lose a few points although they would lose some lower draft picks) but pick 22 is worth a lot more because of the player it gets you(and I think a lot of clubs would be interested). The tigers future 3rd a pick about 50 would not quite be enough. I think a future second a pick about 30 would be a little to high. So I think it might take a future 3rd going back the way of the tigers. Maybe a pick about 45. Feel free to change it up some more what do you think?
Lol Norf
Collingwood trade pick 22 and future 3rd (pick about 45 don't have it yet) for picks 41,47 and future 2ndI am a little confused. What would you want for 22 with your adjustment?
Hypothetically FO
Macpherson wanting to stay @ GC is good. Hopefully we can pinch pick 19 off them now...
Lol Norf
We should swap Caddy for Tarrant and get North to take his contract. Then take McPherson and pick 19 off GC.I expect Hawthorn to hijack the MacPherson salary dump deal for pick #19.
They would have just as much cap space as lolNorf
We should swap Caddy for Tarrant and get North to take his contract. Then take McPherson and pick 19 off GC.