- Dec 18, 2005
- 22,113
- 15,292
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Richmond
Hahahaha Astbury won't make it and who the hell is Griffiths???
Griffiths will be a machine. 200cm, 105kg and very quick. Huge kick. He'll be smashing packs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Hahahaha Astbury won't make it and who the hell is Griffiths???
As long as his arms stay attached to his body.Griffiths will be a machine. 200cm, 105kg and very quick. Huge kick. He'll be smashing packs
I'd take Deledio, Riewoldt and White.
As for matching Richmond's, it doesn't. It shits all over it!
Like I said, 3 plays across 4 years with hope that Astbury, Edwards and Nason might turn into something above serviceable.
We have Ryder, Hurley, Pears, Gumbleton, Hooker and Melksham with hopes that Colyer, Reimers, Myers and Zaharakis turn into something above serviceable.
We got you covered mate, no hiding it. No other club could produce a better spine with players in the same age group.
Mcguane
WTF???
You can have him. Take Houli back while you're at it.
Yep. And I'd rather just Cotchin, Martin and Riewoldt over all those guys.
The only thing Pears and Hooker are good for is coughing up goals.
Considering you haven't even mentioned North or Adelaide in your list, I'm going to take your opinion as meaning **** all.
West Coast and/or Essendon come out and win 9 plus games next year (which they did in 2009 - what a stretch!) and others **** all, you'll be coming out saying that WCE and Essendon have promising lists, yadda, yadda, ya.
ill never come out and say Essendon have a promising list, because they
dont and 2011 will show that, as 2010 did.
... and judging by your name, you sir are an idiot and/or troll.WTF???
You can have him. Take Houli back while you're at it.
Yep. And I'd rather just Cotchin, Martin and Riewoldt over all those guys.
The only thing Pears and Hooker are good for is coughing up goals.
The only team that has relyed on Bruce is the opposition.What about 2009?
You finished 1 game ahead of Essendon in '10 whilst relying on McDonald and Bruce who are both gone.
His 27 possesion game vs Brisbane was terrible man. I remember it clearly. You guys got of to a big league then put on a uber flood. 20 of those possessions Watts got were on a wing leaving his man as a loose defender covering the next option. My grandma would of got 27 possesions playing under those tactics. He played as a loose man on the wing
Off-topic : W=L, can you clear your inbox? I tried to message you.Back to thread:
Out of the younger teams:
Best: Melbourne, Collingwood, Essendon, Freo
Worst: Richmond, West Coast
I reckon Griffith , although injury prone, and Astbury as KPP's players have shown more in their first year than a lot of other players have ,
Back to thread:
Out of the younger teams:
Best: Melbourne, Collingwood, Essendon, Freo
Worst: Richmond, West Coast
Hurley first year - 16 possesions per game, 6 marks (matchwinning performance which put Essensdon into the finals. Also had scalps like Riewoldt and Tredrea) Plus a swift kick to a cabbies groin!
Griffiths - 3.5 disposals per game, 0.8 marks per game.
Richmond supporters are seriously deluded.
The answer is clearly Collingwood.
Anyone suggesting an alternative is having a laugh.
EFA
Yeh everyone loves a racist cabbie basher!
Yea the two best midfielders from the last 3 drafts and the best young key position player ?
West Coast's youngsters have achieved just as much as Melbourne's and more than Essendon's.
In other words you have no comeback. Thanks for agreeing with me.
Griffiths has shown **** all yet Richmond supporters are talking him up by saying "he has shown more than most first year players"
DELUDED!
Hurley showed more in his 1st quarter of AFL football than Griffiths showed for the entirety of his first year.
LOL no.West Coast's youngsters have achieved just as much as Melbourne's and more than Essendon's.