He’s a people
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
2nds 2024 Adelaide Crows SANFL thread
- Thread starter dogs105
- Start date
- Tagged users None
jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
Oh, so it’s YOUR fault!
Picking Panos and Donelly was a big gamble that backfired. Panos was cooked and couldn't run. Donelly apparently had a fractured wrist and McBean gave him a bath.
Taking two injured players into a GF and you run the risk of being in serious trouble if anyone else gets ijured.
Mr MysteryGuest
Norm Smith Medallist
- Apr 4, 2015
- 8,949
- 9,367
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
there was a hold 5 seconds before that
- Aug 9, 2019
- 37,027
- 64,562
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Panthers, GWV Rebels, Central Augusta
Anyone know when the SANFL is supposed to release the re-vamped SANFL rules for playing lists for the Crows and the Powa for 2025. It was reported to be a review happening where changes were mooted?
last i heard Bicks there was still discussions going on amongst SANFL committee and clubs to come up with new rules. It must be getting close though as all teams will be wanting to refresh lists after free agency week is completed.
GreyCrow
Make me an Admin!
- Mar 21, 2016
- 81,766
- 133,909
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt, White Sox
Source Josh Money
- May 8, 2022
- 582
- 1,263
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Can we trust him?
If it benefits Port yes.
- Aug 9, 2019
- 37,027
- 64,562
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Panthers, GWV Rebels, Central Augusta
So we can bring over say Flynn Penry as a development ruck if he goes undrafted and is agreeable? Surely we'd go more for lads out of the CTL than the SANFL given it's a better talent development pathway.
Only thing I can see that may hold that back would be we'd need to find employment outside of footy and somewhere to live?
I reckon we'll end up going half/half for that reason.
Might be the way to bring over a ruck if we yet again fail to draft one.
I wonder how thins is worked out. First in best dressed or for Sa clubs present alignment from where you can obtain players. Or is it split down middle. Crows you can have up to 4. Port same
More details needed
More details needed
WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #4,438
Not sure this makes a lot of sense .....surely our grievance is not about getting more U21 players on our SANFL list
1. 1-8 players U21 .....meh, do we even need this at all
2. Just the 4 over 21+ ....the adding of more senior players to support our youth, is our major need .....I can't see our goal being to raid SANFL Clubs .....it's their paranoia
It should be unlimited 21+ players, with point (2) being a restrictor .....this is the major gripe, not having open age recruiting capabilities similar to SANFL Clubs and VFL Clubs
They forget, our priority is our youth development .....that alone will restrict how many 21+ players we select
Very short sighted again
1. 1-8 players U21 .....meh, do we even need this at all
2. Just the 4 over 21+ ....the adding of more senior players to support our youth, is our major need .....I can't see our goal being to raid SANFL Clubs .....it's their paranoia
It should be unlimited 21+ players, with point (2) being a restrictor .....this is the major gripe, not having open age recruiting capabilities similar to SANFL Clubs and VFL Clubs
They forget, our priority is our youth development .....that alone will restrict how many 21+ players we select
Very short sighted again
Scorpus
Moderator
- Apr 16, 2014
- 61,759
- 165,169
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Moderator
- #4,440
In the VFL, AFL aligned teams must have 15 open age and 15 development (under 22) players on the list and VFL sides must field a minimum of seven under 22 players each week.
Most of the affiliated teams don't field more than 4 players that would qualify under the "Open Age List" in the SANFL.
I assume the existing top up list rules remain so we can fill out the rest of the squad
WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #4,441
Wasn't the issue previously, how many ex AFL / VFL players we could list ?
There won't be too many of those types to move interstate .....due to costs / wages .....increasing from 1 to 4 is more centred around protecting SANFL Clubs .....just a strage set of rules
WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #4,443
Correct ....it appears 21+ players (our greatest need) is not addressed ....other than saying you have to get those 4 players from the SANFL
No mention of 21+ YO players outside of the SANFL ..... AFL / VFL
Scorpus
Moderator
- Apr 16, 2014
- 61,759
- 165,169
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Moderator
- #4,444
My reading of that post is that we can now sign 4 open list (previously marquee players) from anywhere, SANFL or AFL or wherever. But if we take them from the SANFL, only one from each club.
Personally that sounds great and a huge win for us relative to what we had before
- Aug 9, 2019
- 37,027
- 64,562
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Panthers, GWV Rebels, Central Augusta
Magma
TheBrownDog
sanfl site has the full details. i dont mind it and i think it's a good enough balance. sanfl clubs dont get raided and it opens up more in terms of recruiting potential players from interstate.
i think while not player related, the investment into the umpiring in this state is critical. have heard before that the numbers are so low that there is a lack of 'senior' umpires in some games and it obviously has an effect on games. while no one likes umpires it is certainly a worse standard in the last 10-15 years.
My question from the SANFL new rules are that if we recruit 12 players over the 2 categories beside the community list. Where will play them. If we don't have a heap of injuries we will have to outsource them to maybe the Adelaide FL.
I suppose Gaza is out of reach. Do we make an alignment with Adelaide Uni Blacks while Port would go to Port District. There would be issues with the playing standard.
For the 12 players I would anticipate a Ruck, Key Forward, Key Back, a small forward and midfielders.
The Ruck's game time limited to Div 1 is that fair.
I suppose Gaza is out of reach. Do we make an alignment with Adelaide Uni Blacks while Port would go to Port District. There would be issues with the playing standard.
For the 12 players I would anticipate a Ruck, Key Forward, Key Back, a small forward and midfielders.
The Ruck's game time limited to Div 1 is that fair.
Where do our existing supplementary players go, when they're not required by our SANFL team?
- Aug 30, 2021
- 18,871
- 37,280
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Darren Chandler in his 5AA interview last week made the same point I have, SANFL players aren’t going to leave their clubs to play for us especially.
Why would an established player who is no hope of getting drafted leave a true SANFL club whose goal is to win the flag, not rest players during finals?
Then those players will have to compete with the development priorities of the AFL side both in selection and positional.
Finally why would we want more experienced players getting in the way of the development of our AFL players? Let’s say we bring in an experienced Mid and our side is also littered with AFL young mids needing development, what’s our priorities?
Why would an established player who is no hope of getting drafted leave a true SANFL club whose goal is to win the flag, not rest players during finals?
Then those players will have to compete with the development priorities of the AFL side both in selection and positional.
Finally why would we want more experienced players getting in the way of the development of our AFL players? Let’s say we bring in an experienced Mid and our side is also littered with AFL young mids needing development, what’s our priorities?
The point was this season we had 3 players beside the community list players. The community list players had a club to return to. The 3 players signed on were Madgen - SANFL captain and assistant coach for AFLW, Toby Murray drafted MSD in May and Tyler Welsh who could return to WWT lower grades and SANFL Under 18. Before SANFL season Sloane & Milera on LTI. I do not anticipate a dozen players on the LTI at the start of the SANFL season.
