unitedhawk
Team Captain
I'm amazed at the number of people on this thread who've veered away from the original point of the original post.
The OP was a criticism of the media's double standards between their respective treatment of Hawthorn's and Richmond's rebuilding strategy. It wasn't a criticism of the Tigers' strategy, which I think almost all of us agree with.
That said, it's fair to say that most of the proper journalists acknowledged their initial error and quickly accepted that the Hawks' strategy was working. We know the one exception to that - the bloke whose name isn't worth polluting this forum with.
Btw, all the best to the Tigers! I really like what they're doing and reckon it'll succeed in the long run, as long as they're prepared for the growing pains of the next few years.
Edit: The key to success for the Tigers will, as ever, be proper development and coaching, not just the innate talent of their rich draft crop.
The OP was a criticism of the media's double standards between their respective treatment of Hawthorn's and Richmond's rebuilding strategy. It wasn't a criticism of the Tigers' strategy, which I think almost all of us agree with.
That said, it's fair to say that most of the proper journalists acknowledged their initial error and quickly accepted that the Hawks' strategy was working. We know the one exception to that - the bloke whose name isn't worth polluting this forum with.
Btw, all the best to the Tigers! I really like what they're doing and reckon it'll succeed in the long run, as long as they're prepared for the growing pains of the next few years.
Edit: The key to success for the Tigers will, as ever, be proper development and coaching, not just the innate talent of their rich draft crop.
Last edited: