Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Taylor is a reserves player. He played 2 good games for us. That's it. You want to play him? He definitely would have been delisted this year had he not had a contract. Ronke at least has talent if not confidence. Taylor has confidence but no talent. It showed in his one outing this year. Not up to the standard. Since coming to us, Taylor averages 9 disposals in the midfield. That's real class. Ronke is not much better but 8 as a forward is far better than 9 as a mid.
Clarke is another. A pure mid. Well defensive mid. Averages 11. So was George, who averages 18 yet George gets traded out and Clarke is still taking up list space. Next year we might be able to delist Taylor, Clarke and Ronke if his 2022 is sh*te. I have seen Ronke play mids and he is better than the other two. Taylor gets lots of ball at reserves level but has 45% efficiency. Clarke is even worse but doesn't get it as much.
Taylor's only game netted 3. Clarke's 3.
Seriously you just make shit up.Harry is a 50/50 kick at best. He is a good defender though. But sometimes I cover my eyes when he kicks
They were subs!Taylor's only game netted 3. Clarke's 3. They are not up to AFL standard. VFL. Players only. Not enough talent at AFL level.
On JAT-L29 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Thanks. I hadn't got to the Cunningham response yet. 75% kicking efficiency this year, which as a small lockdown defender is pretty good. Dawson and McInerney, wingers/half backs with more time and space, had 76% for comparison. Cunningham blitzed Gulden who people froth over (67%) and Blakey who we now see as our great half back hope (62%).Seriously you just make sh*t up.
3 examples;
Taylor had 6 disposals in his game as sub (not the 3)
Clarke played 2 games as sub (not one) and over the 3 seasons he's been here he's averaged 17 disp per game (excl subs) not the 11 claimed by you.
Cunningham has averaged 80% disposal efficiency over his career (and bettered that in 2021) not exactly the '50/50 kick at his best' you suggested.
I will give you you thing.
You sound authoritative when posting nonsense.
Just like ads on TV. A waste of time listening.Seriously you just make sh*t up.
3 examples;
Clarke played 2 games as sub (not one) and over the 3 seasons he's been here he's averaged 17 disp per game (excl this year's subs) not the 11 claimed by you.
Taylor had 6 disposals in his game as sub (not the 3)
Cunningham has averaged 80% disposal efficiency over his career (and bettered that in 2021) not exactly the '50/50 kick at his best' you suggested.
I will give you you thing.
You sound authoritative when posting nonsense.
Does sound like a player....Wilmot's is good considering he's the youngest potential draftee (18 on NYE). He looks to have some dash, class skills, always looking and won't settle for mediocre options, happy to contest a mark or tackle, plus according to Draft Central, his voice can always be heard, potential leadership. Whichever position he settles into (half back, wing, small defender, hybrid mid) I reckon he'd be a value pick. Chesser's was class as well.
Just like ads on TV. A waste of time listening.
This ad begs to differ.
No disagreement from me. All in favour of drafting someone to be a KPD. Bazzo seems a popular choice, along with JVR. Trust Beatson and Dalrymple on that.Maybe he was fit, but he was lighter than Bazzo for example, considered one of the more longer term KPDs available in the 20s/30s this year (and a similar size to McCartin at draft time). I'm not saying that a Bazzo or others will definitely be ready for senior games in < 2 years, but it is possible, and it is far less likely if we don't even try.
I previously posted Goater's highlights provided by the AFL;
List Mgmt. - 2021 Draft and Trade Hypotheticals
Hi everyone, for those interested some great links plus the Big Footy Draft, Trade & Free Agency twitter as per below:www.bigfooty.com
I mentioned It's only a two minute clip and that's all I've seen of him, but I can't say Goater's kicking inspires confidence, even when in the clear.
This is a 3 minute clip of his involvement in the Vic metro v Vic country game from earlier in the season;
Fair to say it has not allayed my concerns about his kicking.
What site gives you the kicking efficiencies?Thanks. I hadn't got to the Cunningham response yet. 75% kicking efficiency this year, which as a small lockdown defender is pretty good. Dawson and McInerney, wingers/half backs with more time and space, had 76% for comparison. Cunningham blitzed Gulden who people froth over (67%) and Blakey who we now see as our great half back hope (62%).
What site gives you the kicking efficiencies?
Not really. Nobody is getting recruited if they're not vaccinated. Anyone not will be alone with their "beliefs" LOL.Is the AFL jab policy going to effect recruitment? would a club have to ask the player what his beliefs are?
No idea if he's any good obviously but seems to be athletic as any (tick), and Murray Bushrangers says little go home factor (tick).Answering my own question but I checked and he is a medium defender which is the last thing we need right now.
Not really. Nobody is getting recruited if they're not vaccinated. Anyone not will be alone with their "beliefs" LOL.
I'm not sure what to make of the kicking efficiency stat, as you need to know the context - how much pressure the kicker was under, what degree of risk was taken, was the best option taken, etc, not just the execution.
From my armchair recruiting position in the peanut gallery, the Goater video is diabolical. Turnover city. If that's representative of the quality of first rounder this year then it's a worry. Maybe it's just a covid year thing.
For me, one the most impressive videos of potential draftee has been Zac Taylor. I love the way he holds on to the ball as he runs, and sizes up the options. It reminds me of Goodes. You don't then need to be a super precision kicker, just need you use awareness, vision and be smart. This is also why I believe Gulden is such a great kick.
Kicking is overrated anyway.
Mcveigh was a good kick - but a legendary decision maker. That is much more important imo.
Seriously you just make sh*t up.
3 examples;
Clarke played 2 games as sub (not one) and over the 3 seasons he's been here he's averaged 17 disp per game (excl this year's subs) not the 11 claimed by you.
Taylor had 6 disposals in his game as sub (not the 3)
Cunningham has averaged 80% disposal efficiency over his career (and bettered that in 2021) not exactly the '50/50 kick at his best' you suggested.
I will give you you thing.
You sound authoritative when posting nonsense.
I think if an inside mid was one of our higher needs, I'd agree, we'd just have to hope to get his kicking to an adequate level. But while we have other more pressing deficiencies and it sounds like we're interested in inside types at later picks (Dittmar, Warner as a hybrid, Anderson), probably want a more well rounded mid or one who can play on the wing as a distributor (since we lost Dawson). I had thought of Knevitt as a possible at 18/19, but have moved more to Wilmot, Chesser types, although sounds like Taylor has a lot of fans.I might be in the minority but I liked Goater's highlights for an inside mid. That burst speed from congestion is becoming very important in the modern AFL, and I think that it's something that we've targeted recently. See Warner, Rowbottom, rotating Papley through there. He has good hands, so let him step on the gas to get some separation, handball to McInerney / Campbell etc in space and we're laughing. You're not going to get his combination of speed and power together with elite kicking with pick 19 - that describes a top 5 pick.
I might be in the minority but I liked Goater's highlights for an inside mid. That burst speed from congestion is becoming very important in the modern AFL, and I think that it's something that we've targeted recently. See Warner, Rowbottom, rotating Papley through there. He has good hands, so let him step on the gas to get some separation, handball to McInerney / Campbell etc in space and we're laughing. You're not going to get his combination of speed and power together with elite kicking with pick 19 - that describes a top 5 pick.
Probably not. I don't think we'd be looking at it from the perspective of keeping Chad happy or locking two players into the club (didn't work for the Crouch's or Hills), so I imagine we just rate Corey (he is being talked about more than Chad was, and higher rated, but hard to say how much of that is the media on the brother angle). You could make some assumptions potentially around attitude, work ethic and how well the player will adjust to moving away from home, either from Chad himself or in any interactions the club has had with the family, which might lessen the perceived risk a bit. It might be the deciding factor if most things are considered equal between players, but not much else.So do we have any evidence that having two brothers on the same list is actually a good thing? Because all that comes to mind for me are the Crouch brothers and the Hill brothers, not to mention dozens of other short-lived, ill-fated brotherly reunions at clubs.
Cornes brothers, Scott brothers? Hmm not sure who else.So do we have any evidence that having two brothers on the same list is actually a good thing? Because all that comes to mind for me are the Crouch brothers and the Hill brothers, not to mention dozens of other short-lived, ill-fated brotherly reunions at clubs.