List Mgmt. 2021 Trade & List Management Thread II - IN: CCJ

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Have I missed something here?
Yes.

This is BigFooty. Perceived slights, unverified half truths and mock outrage are the way we roll in this place. Get with the programme.

Us standing firm on CCJ because we have leverage = good negotiating.
MacPherson standing firm because he has leverage = he's a sh*t bloke. Do. Not. Want.
 
Tarrant won't give a sh*t. He's agreed to a deal with Richmond and he'll just want to get there.
Same with CCJ.

Apparently a few tuggers want to bring kebabs to North games next year. lol
 
The McPherson thing is potentially a genuine snag. Even though we all know the deal is primarily around pick #19.

The team would endure a salary dump scenario without dissent if it's 1-2 years but seeing a player who'd currently project in our 10-22 range racking up 3 years on the list might test their patience.

Particularly when length of list tenure has been a hot topic for us the last 2 seasons (Ziebell, Brown, Tarrant).

Unfortunately we may need to walk away if we can't find a GC player willing to take our terms and let someone else wear any potential collateral damage to their group.

The playing group don't have to rubber stamp every deal but they're human and we need their buy-in. They know how hard some of them had to fight for an extended deal and saw their teammates move on that too.

Polec for McPherson and 19.
 
A bit on CCJ from Adam Kingsley - 12 min in

 
Unable to listen, highlights?
 
Yes.

This is BigFooty. Perceived slights, unverified half truths and mock outrage are the way we roll in this place. Get with the programme.

Us standing firm on CCJ because we have leverage = good negotiating.
MacPherson standing firm because he has leverage = he's a sh*t bloke. Do. Not. Want.

Understood.

I'll do better.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

A bit on CCJ from Adam Kingsley - 12 min in


Sooky Sooky
 
Yes.

This is BigFooty. Perceived slights, unverified half-truths and mock outrage are the way we roll in this place. Get with the programme.

Us standing firm on CCJ because we have leverage = good negotiating.
MacPherson standing firm because he has leverage = he's a sh*t bloke. Do. Not. Want.

At least someone gets it.

The sentence in bold should be pinned to every page in this thread.
 
Haven't listened but that would sum it up.

Did Sydney sulk around the media and ghostwrite copy when Nankervis wanted to be traded?

Their posters have gone next level.

Day 2 of trade period has seen certain individuals on their board now claiming that I've been "PM'ing" them (can assure you I only ever PM GR & TFW).

By Day 6, they will be claiming that I've been leaving burning paper bags of dog s*** on their door step.
 
To lose one young KPP, Mr Kingsley, may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose two looks like carelessness.




Apologies to Oscar Wilde.
Here we go
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top