Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Taranto is a non proven midfielder so in the end he might become another HFF which we have plenty of, Amon will cost os nothing except $ and he is an upgrade on our current list if we contend for the flag in next 3 years Amon fits the bill.
Who would of recruited Ed Langdon from Freo when he left probably 1 or 2 clubs at best has 1 good year they win a flag.
How is Taranto unproven as a midfielder? He's played in the middle for the vast majority of his career.
Amon would likely cost more than 600k a year for a small upgrade on what we already have while also not addressing our biggest issue which is a mid who can win the ball. We shouldn't be overpaying someone just because they are available. Surely we have moved past that desperation stage.
How is he being squeezed out , has only missed two games for the yearJames Harmes on radar he is being squeezed out at the Dees.
Yes, because saying we should target younger players to fill the age gap in our midfield means I am calling for mediocrity.Dont want DeGoey and dont want some other players.
Happy with mediocrity, got it.
Maybe if his contract was around 500-550k. But all the reports of him being close to 700-750k a year, no thanks. Would hope we had learnt from the Hill contract to not hand one of those out again.Amon would be an upgrade. We need mids too but only really high end ones. We have plenty of depth but need some sizzle on the steak.
Were a finals side now so you kind of are saying "nah just the youth and lets hope and pray they wind up being good".Yes, because saying we should target younger players to fill the age gap in our midfield means I am calling for mediocrity.
Considering I have been saying I'd rather give up draft picks for a 22-25 year old, we would probably already have a pretty good idea if they could play or not.Were a finals side now so you kind of are saying "nah just the youth and lets hope and pray they wind up being good".
We have a known quantity right now that is close to flag material in a relatively weak comp. Its one in the hand two in the bush stuff.
So just to summarise.Considering I have been saying I'd rather give up draft picks for a 22-25 year old, we would probably already have a pretty good idea if they could play or not.
Big call to say a Taranto/Dunkley/Hooper type would take 3-5 to establish themselves at a different club given the quality of player they have been.So just to summarise.
You dont want any players who will absolutely improve us now and who will cost us absolutely nothing in future development as free agents when were argurably challenging for a flag now and for the next 2ish years in lieu of giving up draft picks to hopefully have players for 3-5 years time to compliment guys we currently have who might end up being total busts?
Cool... cool.
Im talking about the guys we already have, anyway we clearly have very different philosophies on list management and id wager were both very glad the other isnt in charge of it.Big call to say a Taranto/Dunkley/Hooper type would take 3-5 to establish themselves at a different club given the quality of player they have been.
Can't sign Jackson & Brayshaw without Harmes falling out to release $ & he is the most expendable player they have in the MF.How is he being squeezed out , has only missed two games for the year
Big call to say a Taranto/Dunkley/Hooper type would take 3-5 to establish themselves at a different club given the quality of player they have been.
Agree go all out for players and strike while we can, look at Geelong they do it all the time and play consistent finals.Were a finals side now so you kind of are saying "nah just the youth and lets hope and pray they wind up being good".
We have a known quantity right now that is close to flag material in a relatively weak comp. Its one in the hand two in the bush stuff.
Brayshaw is a gun but it's been a while since he has played as an inside mid. In that scenario, I'd rather take the gamble that Taranto continues his trajectory of being a gun mid at the cost of draft picks.Taranto looks the only one really in the sights at the moment. You probably have to give up 2 x FRDPs to get him with a second rounder coming back. He’s worth chasing but he’s potentially Dylan Shiel too. Everything is a gamble. It will cost money and picks. Brayshaw looks a better bet.
It's not the behaviour I'm questioning, it's the decision to go to Bali, especially after what happened in the USA.I have heard personal stories from a woman who had a run in with a couple of our current players. Guys that you’d consider clean skins and one recently delisted player. Probably coked, definitely drunk definitely much worse than JDG in Bali.
Footy players are often poorly behaved. It’s a lifestyle where they meet women who are throwing themselves at them, guys offer drugs and drinks or want to fight them. De Goey is a FA as someone said. He does dumb things he’s off the list and we have money for another FA next year. It’s like a gamble where he could look like an A hole for a couple of weeks or we could also just fade away into obscurity waiting.
Difference of opinion on strategy aside do we actually need a ball winning mid?Brayshaw is a gun but it's been a while since he has played as an inside mid. In that scenario, I'd rather take the gamble that Taranto continues his trajectory of being a gun mid at the cost of draft picks.
Go all out for the player who best has what we are desperate for over getting the FA who doesn't completely address our needs.
After seeing how badly we have lost the midfield battle with Steele out, yes.Difference of opinion on strategy aside do we actually need a ball winning mid?
We have Crouch, Steele, Ross, Gresh and Clark, Windy, Owens coming through.
Is it really that pressing a need?
What do you consider big money? I dont think anyone is suggesting throwing cash at him (if our offer is more than 750-800 id be suprised, personally i wouldnt go over 700 and if he doesnt wanna take it then so be it)It's not the behaviour I'm questioning, it's the decision to go to Bali, especially after what happened in the USA.
It suggests he lacks professionalism and I'd be nervous paying big money to such a player.
Steele got hurt in the Geelong game (which we won).After seeing how badly we have lost the midfield battle with Steele out, yes.
Whats the risk?
He’s a free agent and if he stuffs up again - we sack him.
Steele got hurt in the Geelong game (which we won).
We then beat Adelaide who for their many issues actually have a pretty decent midfield.
Flogged North in a game that proved nothing either way
Lost to Brisbane in a pretty tight game where we ran out of legs
And lost to Essendon (who also dont have a terrible midfield) in a game where we flat out didnt show up (and still managed to halve the clearance count).
We were s**t on Friday across the park but i dont think it was just midfield, in fact our pressure coming off our own forward line was the much much bigger issue on Friday than our midfield.
Taranto is a non proven midfielder so in the end he might become another HFF which we have plenty of, Amon will cost os nothing except $ and he is an upgrade on our current list if we contend for the flag in next 3 years Amon fits the bill.
Who would of recruited Ed Langdon from Freo when he left probably 1 or 2 clubs at best has 1 good year they win a flag.