Rumour 2023 Rumours and Speculation (Rumours total 33!, 1 BIG FISH ALERT last October 4th) (7 confirmed! 11 Busted!)

Will Clayton Oliver join the Adelaide Crows?


  • Total voters
    168

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wanna bet...this is the VFL you are talking about
I'm sure the new AFL 2IC won't favour her old club by adding the VFL herbs & spices to the FA compo... ;)
 

Log in to remove this ad.


The bombers also want a 1st rounder for BZT..hahaha..make port squirm
Bahahahahahahaha… that fxxkn spud isnt worth anywhere near a 1st rounder!..

suck shit powah.. gonna get pineappled by geelong and the dons by the look of it!..

The dodo is in his last year at the dons.. he’ll want to leave on a high so he can make himself look good to any future potential employers..

plus.. this idea that picks after 30 this year are somehow gonna satisfy clubs in trades.. its dumb. Why would clubs want picks that arent worth anything?.. might as well send the player to the PSD if you’re getting nothing of value for them anyway..
 
Bahahahahahahaha… that fxxkn spud isnt worth anywhere near a 1st rounder!..

suck s**t powah.. gonna get pineappled by geelong and the dons by the look of it!..

The dodo is in his last year at the dons.. he’ll want to leave on a high so he can make himself look good to any future potential employers..

plus.. this idea that picks after 30 this year are somehow gonna satisfy clubs in trades.. its dumb. Why would clubs want picks that arent worth anything?.. might as well send the player to the PSD if you’re getting nothing of value for them anyway..
"Clarkson has said we will (match), we haven’t got any defenders, it’d be pick 19 not 20 which would get pushed back to around 26.

“So if I was Essendon I’d be smart, just drag it up another $20,000 or $30,000 (or) $40,000, get Pick 3 for the Roos.”

Clarkson is a dead set piece of shit and a hack. Thinks he has the right telling other clubs what to pay a player. An absolute campaigner.
 
"Clarkson has said we will (match), we haven’t got any defenders, it’d be pick 19 not 20 which would get pushed back to around 26.

“So if I was Essendon I’d be smart, just drag it up another $20,000 or $30,000 (or) $40,000, get Pick 3 for the Roos.”

Clarkson is a dead set piece of s**t and a hack. Thinks he has yge right telling other clubs what to pay a player. An absolute campaigner.
Wish we took that approach with b crouch
 
"Clarkson has said we will (match), we haven’t got any defenders, it’d be pick 19 not 20 which would get pushed back to around 26.

“So if I was Essendon I’d be smart, just drag it up another $20,000 or $30,000 (or) $40,000, get Pick 3 for the Roos.”

Clarkson is a dead set piece of s**t and a hack. Thinks he has the right telling other clubs what to pay a player. An absolute campaigner.
That first line says it all when it comes to the complete and utter selfishness of Clarko..

seriously.. the bloke is a fraud. He has completely destroyed his stature in the game for me.. reduced to scrounging for and demanding handouts

if you are, as you say Clarko, “struggling for defenders” then why the fxxk are you pushing one out of your side/or letting one walk just in the hope you can get another high draft pick?..

shouldnt you be trying to instead keep him at the club..

this whole competition is a complete farce..

North should be told to pack the fuxxk up and go back to the VFL.. not given endless handouts to the detriment of the integrity of the draft.
 
That first line says it all when it comes to the complete and utter selfishness of Clarko..

seriously.. the bloke is a fraud. He has completely destroyed his stature in the game for me.. reduced to scrounging for and demanding handouts

if you are, as you say Clarko, “struggling for defenders” then why the fxxk are you pushing one out of your side/or letting one walk just in the hope you can get another high draft pick?..

shouldnt you be trying to instead keep him at the club..

this whole competition is a complete farce..

North should be told to pack the fuxxk up and go back to the VFL.. not given endless handouts to the detriment of the integrity of the draft.

The problem is the AFL are using North Melbourne for TV rights money. The AFL is entirely corrupt because it chases financial windfalls at the expense of the competition and its clubs. Its all smoke and mirrors. The AFL dont care about North Melbourne or the actual competition. They care about money and the pay increases they can give each other as a slap on the back for a good job.

A stronger North Melbourne attracts a stronger viewership. The AFL can then use increased ratings for North games instead of the 5 people they attract now to push up the value of the tv rights deal. An increased rights deal means not only more money in the bank, it means more money for the administrators pockets, plus the additional crowd figures North will probably pull means a potential crowd bonus for the execs. Its a game. Its 10000% what i'd do if I was a greedy selfish asshat of a human who gave little to no shit about the actual competition. Its why the game seems like we are perpetually run by amateurs, its because we are while at the same time run by professional crooks.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

It's smoke and mirrors to suggest the AFL need North for viewing figures

If they did they would be getting Friday and Saturday prime time games

They need North for one thing and one thing only.

Voting bloc
 
It's smoke and mirrors to suggest the AFL need North for viewing figures

If they did they would be getting Friday and Saturday prime time games

They need North for one thing and one thing only.

Voting bloc

Its a combination. You wont put North prime time but a stronger North adds value to the out of market games because of the stronger ratings. Off course though you are probably just as right as I am. The AFL is as corrupt as the day is long.
 
Ok ..i'd like to know who is posting under the alias Snuffaluphagus....whoever it is has a freo fetish😁
Homer Simpson Hello GIF by FOX TV
 
He's probably on 350-400. Over a three year contract (a player target) that could be 50-70k per year on top of our actual offer to Will Day, Mason Redman etc we could have included in 2024 cap front loaded assuming Sloanes replacement was a draftee on 200k.

Would that have made them change their minds? Who knows.
Given that day and redman had rejected coming to the crows before we offered Sloane anything i would say us keeping Sloane had zero impact on us getting those players.
If anything it was the reverse, them rejecting us made us keep Sloane
Was still stupid to keep him.
 
Should have official bigfooty badges with usernames for public use.

*Some people might be wearing 6 at a time.
Lol, they come back from the toilet with a different name...
 
Last edited:
Most believe he's taken a serious pay cut. Most believe the statement made to him (and Boak) that they'll be guaranteed nothing and they'll have to fight for their spot.

Calling posters happy clappers is a bullshit thing to say. As is calling the negative posters "bed wetters".

No need to be an arseh*le about people who disagree with you.

The difference between Sloane and Boak is as soon as we were out of the race for Redman, we had the money for Sloanes desired contract and he was signed up and let's remember he was in the media whinging about not being signed all of June. Boak was told at an exit meeting to decide whether he wanted to retire or take his chances, they are not the same thing. At no point did we ask Sloane to go away and think about it.

Your argument about Stephen Rowes WA doppelganger knowing that Sloane has been told he'll be playing SANFL, doesn't line up with Sloanes own post contract interview where he stated that not only does he think he'll be better for the year further from surgery, he expects to make more impact for us next year and...thinks there could be another contract. So apparently everyone but Sloane knows the deal about this contract or maybe he knows.

I can't wait for your narrative to change next season when Sloane plays the first 2 months in the seniors from "he's been told he will play SANFL a lot in the year" to "the players in the twos aren't putting pressure on the selectors not to select Rory"
 
Bahahahahahahaha… that fxxkn spud isnt worth anywhere near a 1st rounder!..
suck s**t powah.. gonna get pineappled by geelong and the dons by the look of it!..

The dodo is in his last year at the dons.. he’ll want to leave on a high so he can make himself look good to any future potential employers..

plus.. this idea that picks after 30 this year are somehow gonna satisfy clubs in trades.. its dumb. Why would clubs want picks that arent worth anything?.. might as well send the player to the PSD if you’re getting nothing of value for them anyway..
No clubs are ever hiring Dodoro

He’s institutionalised
 
The difference between Sloane and Boak is as soon as we were out of the race for Redman, we had the money for Sloanes desired contract and he was signed up and let's remember he was in the media whinging about not being signed all of June. Boak was told at an exit meeting to decide whether he wanted to retire or take his chances, they are not the same thing. At no point did we ask Sloane to go away and think about it.
Nobody was after Sloane or Boak

1 club told one to wait till after the season ended , 1 club blinked
 
Think the opposite could be true

He’s not making a decision because he can’t get an offer he likes
My guess on it is he's holding out that we'll buckle at the last minute to give him the big deal he wants. The longer he doesn't make a decision, the more pressure the club potentially feels from members to keep him, especially when the free agency period opens up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top