Rumour 2023 Rumours and Speculation (Rumours total 33!, 1 BIG FISH ALERT last October 4th) (7 confirmed! 11 Busted!)

Will Clayton Oliver join the Adelaide Crows?


  • Total voters
    168

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Big "she deserved it for dressing like that" energy in this thread from some.

Obviously if you don't send in the first place, the leak can't happen. That doesn't mean it's their fault it's been leaked publicly, that they "deserved it".

Its kind of like getting changed in a dressing room or the gym. You expect some level of privacy. Unless of course they were unsolicited.
 
Big "she deserved it for dressing like that" energy in this thread from some.

Obviously if you don't send in the first place, the leak can't happen. That doesn't mean it's their fault it's been leaked publicly, that they "deserved it".

If that’s their opinion, okay, but what’s amazing is some of the posters in here whose opinion is not consistent across those two spectrums.

Won’t name any names.

Actually I might. Depends how much they piss me off.
 
Big "she deserved it for dressing like that" energy in this thread from some.

Obviously if you don't send in the first place, the leak can't happen. That doesn't mean it's their fault it's been leaked publicly, that they "deserved it".

Really poor analogy, comparing justification for rape the same as someone sending out an intimate pic and it being leaked
 
If that’s their opinion, okay, but what’s amazing is some of the posters in here whose opinion is not consistent across those two spectrums.

Won’t name any names.

Actually I might. Depends how much they piss me off.
 

5298dc0a-4ac2-4631-b00a-1f6d21436a03_text.gif
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Big "she deserved it for dressing like that" energy in this thread from some.

Obviously if you don't send in the first place, the leak can't happen. That doesn't mean it's their fault it's been leaked publicly, that they "deserved it".
It's possible to be both an idiot and a victim at the same time.
 
So I guess my post got deleted talking about names of our players? I just mentioned names of those involved as it's a rumour thread. I didn't post any pictures or defame them, just mentioned something out in the public.

Oh well.

On CPH2333 using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
So I guess my post got deleted talking about names of our players? I just mentioned names of those involved as it's a rumour thread. I didn't post any pictures or defame them, just mentioned something out in the public.

Oh well.

On CPH2333 using BigFooty.com mobile app

Direction would come from Chief and any advice he's been given I'd guess. Yes it is only a rumour, in a rumour thread and I'm no law speaking guy but how that stacks up legally...probably why it is gone
 
Still is a tidy user 72.8% KE isn't too shabby by AFL standards.

actually, it is shabby. He's 75th of 125 for kicking efficiency among medium defenders. Would be 55th of 71 if he was a key defender. You're ignoring the fact that defenders have higher efficiencies than mids and forwards. Tom's kicking efficiency if a forward would rank him 5th. Ned is 3rd medium forward at 75.4%. You need to understand the game a little better.
 
Dangerfield's deal would've been matched, so Geelong/Adelaide didn't bother with it and went straight to trade.

Geelong don't overpay their players (within the salary - they're probably getting paid outside of it).

call bull$hit on that. If they were paying him as they said, then what's to lose by lodging the RFA contract and hope we don't match? Worst case is they pay what they paid but best case is he's a freebie. The problem is that the RFA offers always leak and they wouldn't have wanted their 'nobody earns more than Joel' lie exposed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top