Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So if Freo and West Coast come knocking what would you do?Absolutely, but no need to sign him for a decade is all
You try and do as much as possible to keep Logan.
I dont know how much the club rates him internally probably not as high as some do on here.
So if Freo and West Coast come knocking what would you do?
Who would play forward next year?
Amartey isn't up to it, McLean is a good back up but he'll never be the main man in a successful squadIf he wants to go and they want to pay massive overs say a million for 8 years then good luck to him.
I'll try and find some other players and use my cap better .
I like Logan, he is promising but he can also easily be the next Sam Reid level player or even worse.
I'd be hoping he will sign and develop with the team , decent coin for short term and see how he goes .
If they want to risk it * it try to maximise him leaving
I already have Amartey and Mclean longer term
Amartey isn't up to it, McLean is a good back up but he'll never be the main man in a successful squad
If his manager is any good you’d think that would be preferable. When he does reach 25/26 years of age then seek the big long term offers. If he’s good enough he”ll command them by then.My guess based on nothing but gut feel is Logan signs for 2 years then looks for a massive pay day , and either farks off or stays long term . Will back himself to be a super star
Our core group of stars are all around the same age, we'd be going backwardsIm not sure Logan is either sorry
I agree Mclean isn't the number one star forward but what he is we need.
Amartey yeah not sold either, but the club has signed him already so you asked who plays forward if Logan leaves, then I guess those 2
He tracks very favourably with KPP at the same age, with plenty to improve on too.Logan averaging 1.5 a game and 2.3 marks per game in i50. Laat year averaging 0.8 contested marks
For context:
Mckay 3.6 - 26yo
Curnow 3 - 27 yo
Hogan 3 - 29yo
Dixon 2.6 - 33yo
JUH 2.6 - 21yo
M. King 2 - 23yo
Hawkins 1.6 - Geelong old
Amiss 1 - 20yo
Cadman 1 - 20yo
Treacy 1 - 21yo
At 21yo Mckay was averaging 1.6 and Curnow 1.9
I am gonna be advocating for a bit of patience for the young fella.
If his manager is any good you’d think that would be preferable. When he does reach 25/26 years of age then seek the big long term offers. If he’s good enough he”ll command them by then.
Club on the other hand would like to lock him in now to a long term deal as it may be cheaper long term.
That's the logical move. However if freo come in with a 10 year deal it makes that tactic null and voidMy guess based on nothing but gut feel is Logan signs for 2 years then looks for a massive pay day , and either farks off or stays long term . Will back himself to be a super star
Our core group of stars are all around the same age, we'd be going backwards
Who said we have to loose Gulden or Warner? We offered Naughton 10 years, not sure it's in that bad shapeIf you pay Logan massive overs you are losing other players though, the cap is not infinite .
No good having Logan Mcdonald if you lose Gulden or Warner etc
I get the feeling gulden and the club have already agreed to terms, and we are just waiting for the perfect time to announce
Who said we have to loose Gulden or Warner? We offered Naughton 10 years, not sure it's in that bad shape
Kinnear Beatson admitted itDid we? Did the club say that or the media?
Did we offer that knowing who might go soon? eg Mcdonald?
And if we think Mcdonald is that great why did we go after Naughton?
Kinnear Beatson admitted it
Did we? Did the club say that or the media?
Did we offer that knowing who might go soon? eg Mcdonald?
And if we think Mcdonald is that great why did we go after Naughton?
But look if we can sign them all and fit in the cap fine, maybe parker and rampe free up space
Because we need a FF and a CHF?
Maybe to replace Amartey?
Maybe future proofing?
No idea
Understand that but you wouldn't offer Naughton that long without it being in a good place.Hey none of us have any idea, especially in this thread
Sometimes wish you had the list of salaries like the NBA
Understand that but you wouldn't offer Naughton that long without it being in a good place.
We did lock in alot of players on long term deals.
Heeney, Mills and Papley may have got unders
Heeney was offered alot by North, he may have had a few big years.Isn't Heeney one of the highest paid in the comp apparently?
I can remember if we chased Naughton prior to getting Adams and Grundy etc
But yes that's a fair assumption otherwise or glass half empty we knew Logan was always going , so had space
Understand that but you wouldn't offer Naughton that long without it being in a good place.
We did lock in alot of players on long term deals.
Heeney, Mills and Papley may have got unders
Imagine when players aren't performing, they would get abused by bad supportersChief secretely prays that one day the AFL makes salaries public.
Can you imagine the amount of discussion it would create on here