Rumour 2024 Rumours and Speculation Part 3

[Jeffcrowe]

I could understand if they split to draft 2 players given how deep this draft is, plus if they were able to extract more, but for Baker? Nah.

Interesting side story where the new west coast list manager is the recruiting manager who helped build Richmond’s premiership era with picks like baker bolton etc

Definitely some part to it

 

[Scorpus]

So Carlton have effectively given up Pick 12, a 2025/1, a 2025/2 and Owies for Pick 3? In an even draft?

These moves suggest the draft is not as even as is being reported.

Otherwise every club would be scrambling to trade down

 

[Danger in Texas]

I think this it the forgotten aspect of the trade, the Blues have given up their F1.

Given its Carlton too, they are very capable of f**king up their season and finishing outside the 8.

Compromised draft next year, so there’s a decent likelihood their F1 is outside the top 10 again

 

[Danger in Texas]

Interesting side story where the new west coast list manager is the recruiting manager who helped build Richmond’s premiership era with picks like baker bolton etc

Definitely some part to it

Also McQualter being the coach now would’ve heavily pushed for it

 

[Hodgy]

So Carlton have effectively given up Pick 12, a 2025/1, a 2025/2 and Owies for Pick 3? In an even draft?

That’s what I think. 2 x 1sts, 1 x 2nd and a 33 goal small forward for FOS is a very high price. He’d want to be bloody good, and if WC end up with Lindsay or Travaglia, Baker (who is criminally undervalued here) and Owies, then history might well show it as a smart trade.

 

[DJ75]

I think this it the forgotten aspect of the trade, the Blues have given up their F1.

Given its Carlton too, they are very capable of f**king up their season and finishing outside the 8.

So Carlton have effectively given up Pick 12, a 2025/1, a 2025/2 and Owies for Pick 3? In an even draft?

Wait. Where did the future picks come into it? Different trades?

 

[Scorpus]

Wait. Where did the future picks come into it? Different trades?

Carlton got pick 14 trading their future 1st and 2nd to Hawthorn

 

[Scorpus]

Interesting side story where the new west coast list manager is the recruiting manager who helped build Richmond’s premiership era with picks like baker bolton etc

Definitely some part to it

Few SOS at Carlton vibes

 

[dylan123]

Why does everyone keep talking about Pyke????? Since when did CEOs make trades? Or is he a CEO/list manager? Or just a list manager and I was wrong with thinking he was a CEO?

 

[Draft Bored]

Interesting side story where the new west coast list manager is the recruiting manager who helped build Richmond’s premiership era with picks like baker bolton etc

Definitely some part to it

So we have the ex-Richmond people at GC and WC overvaluing Richmond players and pooring draft picks into Richmond.

Strange.

 

[Lordcrud]

Rumour, Don Pyke set to be inducted into Carlton’s hall of fame.

 

[Betts are off]

Carlton essentially Playstationed this trade period.

If you told me 1 month ago that Carlton would be picking ahead of us without trading out anyone of significance... I would have laughed you out the building.

 

[Betts are off]

Rumour, Don Pyke set to be inducted into Carlton’s hall of fame.

It's really making that Gallucci over English decision smell a bit better

 

[Sizzlepack]

That’s what I think. 2 x 1sts, 1 x 2nd and a 33 goal small forward for FOS is a very high price. He’d want to be bloody good, and if WC end up with Lindsay or Travaglia, Baker (who is criminally undervalued here) and Owies, then history might well show it as a smart trade.

Yeah I agree. Funnily enough, I don't particularly like this deal for either Carlton or WCE. Imo the only clear winners are Richmond: Baker is good, but 14 in this draft is a very valuable pick.

 

[GROTTO]

Carlton essentially Playstationed this trade period.

Its often laughed at on here, but its happened.

 

[Crow till I die]

Well, from now on, anyone saying that a couple of mid 1sts would never get you a top 3 pick need only be referred back to this trade

 

[Jeffcrowe]

So we have the ex-Richmond people at GC and WC overvaluing Richmond players and pooring draft picks into Richmond.

Strange.

Hahaha pretty much

Handing them a super draft basically

 

[crow2crow]

If this is the case, I wonder if Essendon might be interested in any of our players?

Please murphy

 

[1990crow]

Well, from now on, anyone saying that a couple of mid 1sts would never get you a top 3 pick need only be referred back to this trade

Or clear evidence of how stupid of an idea it is when pick 3 goes on to be a multi AA, bets and fairest level midfielder playing 300 games, and picks 12 and 14 end up playing 150 games, no AA, average to good players.

 

[Ham]

You reckon there is a Murphy-sized hole in their list?

haha here's hoping, or Sholl at maybe close to peak value? Not sure who Bond supported as a kid but I can see him playing there.

 

[crow2crow]

Well, from now on, anyone saying that a couple of mid 1sts would never get you a top 3 pick need only be referred back to this trade

its never happened before not like this

 

[Betts are off]

Its often laughed at on here, but its happened.

Yep, the day of that term being used as an insult for farcical trade scenarios look numbered.

If 2 picks in the teens and a list clogger can get you pick 3.

Time to dust off the remotes people.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

Carlton essentially Playstationed this trade period.

If you told me 1 month ago that Carlton would be picking ahead of us without trading out anyone of significance... I would have laughed you out the building.

What are Port going to take for Houston now. Surely NM won't give up 2 or surely Houston won't go to them.

 

[Cromulant]

Please murphy

Doubt it.

I can see them wanting a guy like Schoenberg especially if Shiel goes.

 

[The Karma Bus]

Big Footy mentioned as why Port Board poo pooed the deal haha

Trade Radio just said it after Board members probably read the Big Footy feedback and scrapped the deal

Classic

Their clubs board have obviously missed the 119 versions of Sack Hinkley threads then.