He's such a shit bloke. Biggest sook ever.Anyone watching Chris Scott presser. Guys lost all sense of reality. Juvenile to boo Ollie Henry , GAJ use to get booed. Cool comparison Chris , go wash your greasy hair
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
He's such a shit bloke. Biggest sook ever.Anyone watching Chris Scott presser. Guys lost all sense of reality. Juvenile to boo Ollie Henry , GAJ use to get booed. Cool comparison Chris , go wash your greasy hair
He's such a s**t bloke. Biggest sook ever.
No. They are 1 win from wrapping up the minor premiership, however that is not what the McClelland Trophy is awarded for anymore.I think you’ll find they are.
No he’s not.
Cats youth copping a hiding on the post show...
Sorry, I didn’t realise they changed it this year.No. They are 1 win from wrapping up the minor premiership, however that is not what the McClelland Trophy is awarded for anymore.
The moment he handballed it, it was play on. Cameron was out of bounds.Do we actually know the written rule for it though? If they call play on and your out of bounds and not off your line it’s not called out of bounds?
I am not being defensive I just genuinely don’t know.
Yeah that was putrid. Hard to label it corruption though seeing as the play on call came before anyone got their hands on it cleanly. There was another dud bounce in the last quarter that wasn't called back either
So we should just ignore his finals record?
His didn't do anything against Geelong last year. In the preliminary final against Sydney, kicked two very early goals and butchered two others in the second half which he would ordinarily kick if he knew it wasn't the be all and end all.
I think he's overrated.
Commentators have talked up as though he'd be a Toby Greene or Dustin Martin if not for injury setbacks. That's a bit of a stretch.
The ball stayed in the circle, so in my opinion it was play on. Just one of those unlucky bounces which happen all the time in our game.
Maybe it's more the fact there is no mandated requirement when celebrating a player for their exploits in specific games to also talk about every game in which they didn't do the same. A poor game against Geelong last year has absolutely nothing to do with kicking goals after the siren and in the dying minutes to win several other games. It's those games being talked about, not whatever criteria you are imagining exists to measure 'did it in these games' vs. 'didn't in those ones'. "Clutch" and however else you think he's being overrated does not have any measurable criteria. It's just footy vocab that dares to go beyond the big 3 (awesome, amazing, and unbelievable).
Whenever a sports star is given the title 'clutch' I automatically look at how they have performed in all matches.
Elliott has kicked some absurdly clutch goals to win games but never in the finals.
If I ask you this, who has been the more clutch footballer, Elliott or De Goey, what is your answer?
I wish.Saints and Dogs heavy favourites? Are you drunk Toffee Lion
Elliot has played about 16x times more H&A games than finals
I don't know what more clutch means, especially when it's coming from you. But for fun's sake, if I had to guess which player has kicked the most 'match-winning' goals I'd guess Elliott but it could easily just be recency bias. I'd never hesitate to say JDG is the better and more important player though. By a long way.
Ask chef about the Dogs in Geelong.I wish.
Dogs definitely favourites, Saints more a stretch just to annoy CC.
I think they can only review the scoring element. Otherwise they'd have overturned goals where a teammate has immediately prior dropped the ball or thrown it etc.I understand the 3 blind mice in yellow cannot see that the ball went out of play.
How come there was no score review? I thought they review every goal? Surely they check the footage and see that Cameron receives the ball out of play before taking the kick - therefore no score ball up?
That is an interesting point, not saying you are wrong but how exactly is the "scoring element" defined cause seems ambiguous? Surely whether a player is inside the field of play when he has a shot on goal is part of the scoring element? How is it different to checking to see if the ball was touched off the boot when kicked? If a player taps it back into play and then a goal is kicked ala Wayne Harmes is that not reviewable?I think they can only review the scoring element. Otherwise they'd have overturned goals where a teammate has immediately prior dropped the ball or thrown it etc.
Cameron got a couple of dubious calls. The ump didn't recall a bounce that led to a Pies goal.
Ultimately the poor umpiring didn't affect the result.